It Is Too Soon To Celebrate Trumps Syria Withdrawal By Jacob G. Hornberger!!!
(2019-01-02 at 12:56:09 )

It Is Too Soon to Celebrate Trumps Syria Withdrawal by Jacob G. Hornberger

Yes, it is possible that President Trump will follow through with his announcement that he is going to pull out all United States troops from Syria.

Just do not bet the farm on it.

Already President Trump has shifted from pulling out the troops immediately to pulling them out four months from now. No one should be surprised if, four months from now, he comes up with a reason for keeping them there even longer.

After all, do not forget that last October President Trump promised to release those JFK records that the Central Intelligence Agency has been keeping secret for 55 years, on grounds of "National Security" of course.

The day before the deadline for release, President Trump declared that he was going to follow through with his promise to release the long-secret records.

The next day - the day of the deadline - President Trump announced that he was granting the Central Intelligence Agencys request to extend the time for secrecy for another three years.

It was a testament to the power of the Central Intelligence Agency and the rest of the national-security establishment.

Now, I do not mean to rain on the parade of those who are celebrating President Trumps supposed rebirth of non-interventionism.

But there are two factors at work here that need to be emphasized: One, President Trump is clearly not a non-interventionist and, two, the enormous power of the national-security establishment to bend United States presidents into complying with its will.

It is true that during his presidential campaign, Mr. Donald Trump criticized the interventions into which the United States government has embroiled our nation on a permanent basis - Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere.

But let us not forget what happened after President Trump was elected. He kept troops in Iraq. He expanded troop levels in Afghanistan. He expanded troops in Syria. He has also got troops killing and dying in Africa.

Let us also not forget the many generals with whom President Trump surrounded himself after he was elected. He appointed a general - James "Mad Dog" Mattis - as his secretary of defense. He appointed a general - John Kelly - as secretary of homeland security and later chief of staff. He appointed a general - Michael Flynn - as his national-security adviser. When Flynn departed, he appointed a general - H.R. McMaster - to replace him as national-security adviser.

And let us not forget that he appointed a Central Intelligence Agency director - Mike Pompeo - to be secretary of state. And that he brought John Bolton, one of the conservative movements fiercest pro-intervention proponents, into his administration.

Those are not the actions of a non-interventionist.

Instead, they are the actions of a person who has bought into the notion that the United States has now become a full-fledged, permanent military nation, one that has no choice but to remain embroiled in never-ending foreign wars and interventions.

Over the Christmas holidays, President Trump paid a surprise visit to troops in Iraq.

Yes, that Iraq!!

The country that the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency invaded and occupied some 15 years ago.

While there, President Trump declared that his troops in Iraq could easily be resent into Syria should the circumstances warrant it.

That is not exactly the mindset of a non-interventionist, especially since it did not even seem to occur to President Trump that United States troops have no business in Iraq either, especially 15 years after the initial invasion, which ostensibly was to find Weapons of Mass Destruction, which were never found during the many years of a subsequent brutal, deadly, and destructive military occupation of the country.

In fact, it is ironic that one of the justifications for sending troops to Syria and resending them to Iraq was to defeat ISIS, which is the group that formed as a direct consequence of the United States invasion and occupation of Iraq.

It is also worth mentioning that ISIS has never had the ability or interest to invade, conquer, and occupy the United States.

It also is worth mentioning that the real reason that United States troops were sent into Syria was in the hope of effecting a regime-change operation against the Assad regime and its Russian supporters.

President Trump also announced that he intends to withdraw half of the 14,000 or so United States troops still serving in Afghanistan, some 17 years after the initial United States invasion of the country.

At the risk of belaboring the obvious, if he withdraws half of them, that still leaves half of them to kill and die in that forever war. That is not exactly a non-interventionist position.

Moreover, let us not forget that President Trump has troops killing and dying in Africa.

Again, that is a position that is not exactly consistent with non-interventionism. And then there is the brutal war that the Trump administration is waging in Yemen in partnership with the murderous Saudi regime.

What good does it do to withdraw some troops from one interventionist campaign only to expand their presence in other interventionist campaigns??

What everyone needs to recognize is the overwhelming ability of the Pentagon, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Agency to bend the other three branches of the United States federal government to its will.

They have clearly done it with the United States federal judiciary, which established a pattern of deference to authority practically from the time the national-security state came into existence after World War II.

It is the same with the United States Congress. No congressman dares take on the deep state for fear of losing military projects in his district.

It is no different with the president. Not one president since John F. Kennedy has taken a firm stance against the national-security establishment and its racket of foreign empire and interventionism.

President Trump is the first since President Kennedy to make a few waves against the deep state, but mostly during his presidential campaign.

As soon as he was elected, he folded and was absorbed by the national-security state, immediately buying into its ever-increasing justifications for more interventions and more tax-funded largess.

Why, the military alone now spends more than the next seven countries combined, and President Trump, even while expressing an intent to bring troops out of Syria and Afghanistan, is eager to grant the militarys request for even more money.

And that despite the fact that the federal government is running close to a trillion-dollar deficit and has a debt of almost $22 trillion.

Will President Trump fulfill his promise to bring United States troops out of Syria within the next four months??

Will he pull out half of the troops in Afghanistan during that same period of time??

Possibly.

But anyone who is hoping that President Trump is restoring the United States of Americas founding foreign policy of non-interventionism is almost certainly going to feeling that hope until the day that President Trump leaves office.

Printed here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Great Website!!