Three Stupid, Annoying Things People Often Say When Defending Trump By Caitlin Johnstone!!!!
(2019-04-27 at 12:18:04 )

Three Stupid, Annoying Things People Often Say When Defending Trump by Caitlin Johnstone

As things get even uglier in Syria I am seeing some President Trump supporters struggling to justify or dismiss the completely indefensible acts of human butchery that this administration has been inflicting upon that country.

They are arguments I have seen recycled in the MAGA crowd every time news breaks about the president once again continuing the reprehensible neoconservative policies of his predecessors and doing the exact opposite of what he pledged to do on the campaign trail, and I thought I would like to address a few of them here.

For those unfamiliar with my work, I have written extensively about the many legitimate grievances that can be leveled at this administration here, here, here, here, and elsewhere.

I have also written extensively about the completely illegitimate accusations that have been leveled against this administration here, here, here, here, and elsewhere.

I do not see President Trump as good or helpful, let alone as the populist savior his supporters hold him to be, but I also do not see him as the psychotic Nazi Putin puppet his detractors try to paint him as either, or even significantly different from his predecessors in any way that meaningfully impacts the United States of Americas policy and behavior.

I would now like to write a bit about some of the bad arguments that are made in support of this administration.

I am going to address a few arguments I see a lot which are just plain stupid, from a nonpartisan, non-ideological perspective.

Depending on your personal opinions about immigration, fiscal policy and so on you will certainly have plenty of reasons to argue for or against the current administration; I am not interested in addressing those here.

I just want to focus on the few stupid, annoying arguments I keep seeing made in defense of the sitting president that are based entirely on bad logic and poor understanding, which stagnate real debate about real concerns.

Here are three of them:
1. " Hillary would have been worse."

I happen to agree that Ms Hillary Clinton would have been worse in some very important ways. Her campaign pledge to install a no-fly zone in an area where Russian military planes are conducting operations was horrifying and disqualifying, and she would have put less inertia on the war machine in a few key areas. Nevertheless, pointing this out is never, ever a legitimate defense of the things that President Trump is doing.

Okay, sure, Hillary would have been worse. So what? How is that a legitimate response to someone condemning this administrations nuclear escalations with Russia, keeping thousands of troops in Syria with the goal of effecting regime change, approving arms sales to Ukraine, working to shut down WikiLeaks and arrest Julian Assange, perpetuation of the Orwellian surveillance state, keeping troops in Afghanistan, escalating tensions with Iran and North Korea, etc?

All you are doing is disingenuously trying to take the target of criticism off the sitting presidents head and drag the conversation kicking and screaming into a moronic partisan debate about who would have been worse. You are killing legitimate debate with an irrelevant red herring.

Responding to criticisms of this administrations depravity with "yeah but Hillary" is like a lawyer trying to defend an accused murderer by pointing out that Jeffrey Dahmer did way worse.

It is stupid. It is annoying. Stop doing it.

2. "Trump is playing 57-D chess!"

We have talked about this before. The above video depicts Cenk Uyger on MSNBC alongside Glenn Greenwald in 2010 ranting about the way Obama supporters were defending their president in exactly the same way the MAGA crowd defends Trump today.

"Because you remember what they told us: Obama is a genius! I could not possibly understand his genius - he is playing three-dimensional chess!" Uyger exclaims in the eight year-old clip. "Well what part of three-dimensional chess do you give away your queen, your knight, your bishop, and the House of Representatives? No! They were wrong, we were right. It is time to fight."

Yes, it is time to fight. It is time to stop defending your presidents nonstop capitulations to the swamp as some great feat of strategic wizardry.

While we are on the subject, I often see Bernie people making the same "chess" argument about Sanders promotion of the new cold war and other dangerous establishment kowtowing. It is not a legitimate defense of Sanders any more than it is a legitimate defense of Trump now or Obama eight years ago.

There is a powerful unelected second government that is controlling the behavior of your elected officials, and by dismissing it as brilliant strategic maneuvering you are actively shoving that urgent problem out of the spotlight.

It is stupid. It is annoying. Stop it.

3. "Trump is fighting the Deep State!"

No, he is not. President Trump is not fighting the deep state, he is collaborating with it. He has continued and expanded the same warmongering Orwellian policies as Bush and Obama, and he is playing right along with the deep states new cold war escalations as well.

President Trump is not fighting the deep state, and the deep state is not fighting him.

There is no "coup".

Everything has completely changed since certain factions within the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency had agendas against him prior to his taking office.

The leaks from inside the intelligence community during his transition and the early days of his administration have completely stopped.

For many many months now whenever you hear about a new leak it is coming from congress, from inside the administration, or from people who interacted with his campaign.

The only people fighting President Trump at this point are Democrats and Never-Trumpers, and that is not what the deep state is.

The deep state is the unelected power establishment consisting of a loose and often conflicting collaboration between plutocrats (including war profiteers), intelligence and defense agencies, and the corporate media which serves as their propaganda wing.

It is completely nonpartisan and uses the United States of Americas elected government in whatever way will best advance its many agendas.

The Democrats and John McCain types working to weaken President Trump is not a deep state agenda, it is normal politics.

This is a crucial distinction.

Russiagate was constructed by the United States intelligence community and pointed at Donald Trump in 2016, but now that he has demonstrated he will be a good little boy and play along with pretty much every one of their agendas they have not been targeting him.

They do not need to. They never cared about impeaching President Trump, they cared about getting their new cold war and crippling the Russia-China tandem.

Since they do not have to get the sitting president impeached to accomplish that (a very risky move anyway), they are content to work with him until the next presidential puppet rolls into office.

It is the Democrats and their allies who are fueling the Trump-Russia collusion narrative at this point, not the deep state.

If you want to support President Trump, that is fine, but do not piss on my leg and tell me it is raining.

Do not tell me you support this president because he is working to overthrow the unelected power establishment which uses the United States government as a weapon to advance its agendas.

That argument is contradicted by the raw facts of everything that has happened in the last year.

It is stupid. It is annoying. Stop it.

Thanks for reading!! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

I recognize no copyright of any kind on this work. You have my unconditional permission to republish it or use any part of it in any way you like, or any of my other writings.