Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils Of Traffic Stops In The American Police State By John W. Whitehead!!!
(2019-05-14 at 05:07:31 )

Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils of Traffic Stops in the American Police State By John W. Whitehead

The Nation. "The framers would be appalled."-Herman Schwartz, the whim of every cop on the beat, trooper on the highway and jail official" The Fourth Amendment was designed to stand between us and arbitrary governmental authority. For all practical purposes, that shield has been shattered, leaving our liberty and personal integrity.

We have all been there before.

You are driving along and you see a pair of flashing blue lights in your rearview mirror. Whether or not you have done anything wrong, you get a sinking feeling in your stomach.

You have read enough news stories, seen enough headlines, and lived in the United States of American police state long enough to be anxious about any encounter with a cop that takes place on the side of the road.

For better or worse, from the moment you are pulled over, you are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to "serve and protect."

This is what I call "blank check policing," in which the police get to call all of the shots.

So if you are nervous about traffic stops, you have every reason to be.

Trying to predict the outcome of any encounter with the police is a bit like playing Russian roulette: most of the time you will emerge relatively unscathed, although decidedly poorer and less secure about your rights, but there is always the chance that an encounter will turn deadly.

Try to assert your right to merely ask a question during a traffic stop and see how far it gets you!!!!

Zachary Noel was tasered by police and charged with resisting arrest after he questioned why he was being ordered out of his truck during a traffic stop. "Because I am telling you to," the officer replied before repeating his order for Noel to get out of the vehicle and then, without warning, shooting him with a taser through the open window.

Unfortunately, as Gregory Tucker learned the hard way, there are no longer any fail-safe rules of engagement for interacting with the police.

It was in the early morning hours of Dec. 1, 2016, when Mr. Tucker, a young African-American man, was pulled over by Louisiana police for a broken taillight. Because he did not feel safe stopping immediately, Tucker drove calmly and slowly to a safe, well-lit area a few minutes away before stopping in front of his cousins house.

That is when what should have been a routine traffic stop became yet another example of police brutality in the United States of America and another reason why Americans are justified in their fear of cops.

According to the lawsuit that was filed in federal court by The Rutherford Institute, police ordered Mr. Tucker out of his vehicle, and after he had stepped out, immediately placed him under arrest for "resisting" (in this case, not immediately stopping) and searched his person and his vehicle. Mr. Tucker was then ordered to move to the front of the police vehicle and place his hands on its hood.

Two more police officers arrived on the scene, walked up behind Mr. Tucker, and grabbed his arms to restrain and handcuffed him.

Then the fourth police officer arrived on the scene.

According to police dash cam footage, Mr. Tucker was thrown to the ground and punched numerous times in the head and body. The police also yelled repeatedly at Mr. Tucker to "quit resisting."

Mr. Tucker, bleeding with injuries to his face, head and arm, was then placed into the back of a police vehicle and EMTs were called to treat him. He was eventually taken to the hospital for severe injuries to his face and arm.

Mind you, this young man complied with police. He just did not do it fast enough to suit their purposes.

This young man submitted to police. He did not challenge police authority when they frisked him, searched his car, handcuffed him, and beat him to a pulp.

If this young man is "guilty" of anything, he is guilty of ticking off the cops by being cautious, concerned for his safety, and all too aware of the dangers faced by young black men during encounters with the police.

Frankly, you do not even have to be young or black or a man to fear for your life during an encounter with the police.

Just consider the growing numbers of unarmed people are who being shot and killed just for standing a certain way, or moving a certain way, or holding something-anything-that police could misinterpret to be a gun, or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officers mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety.

At a time when police can do no wrong-at least in the eyes of the courts, police unions and politicians dependent on their votes-and a "fear" for officer safety is used to justify all manner of police misconduct, "we the people" are at a severe disadvantage.

Add a traffic stop to the mix, and that disadvantage increases dramatically.

According to the Justice Department, the most common reason for a citizen to come into contact with the police is being a driver in a traffic stop.

On average, one in 10 Americans gets pulled over by police.

Black drivers are 31 percent more likely to be pulled over than white drivers, or about 23 percent more likely than Hispanic drivers.

As the Washington Post concludes, "-Driving while black- is, indeed, a measurable phenomenon."

Indeed, police officers have been given free range to pull anyone over for a variety of reasons.

This free-handed approach to traffic stops has resulted in drivers being stopped for windows that are too heavily tinted, for driving too fast, driving too slow, failing to maintain speed, following too closely, improper lane changes, distracted driving, screeching a cars tires, and leaving a parked car door open for too long.

Motorists can also be stopped by police for driving near a bar or on a road that has large amounts of drunk driving, driving a certain make of car (Mercedes, Grand Prix and Hummers are among the most ticketed vehicles), having anything dangling from the rearview mirror (air fresheners, handicap parking permits, troll transponders or rosaries), and displaying pro-police bumper stickers.

Incredibly, a federal appeals court actually ruled unanimously in 2014 that acne scars and driving with a stiff upright posture are reasonable grounds for being pulled over.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that driving a vehicle that has a couple air fresheners, rosaries and pro-police bumper stickers at 2 MPH over the speed limit is suspicious, meriting a traffic stop.

Equally appalling, in Heien v. North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court-which has largely paved the way for the police and other government agents to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance-allowed police officers to stop drivers who appear nervous, provided they provide a palatable pretext for doing so.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the lone objector in the case. Dissenting in Heien, Sotomayor warned, "Giving officers license to effect seizures so long as they can attach to their reasonable view of the facts some reasonable legal interpretation (or misinterpretation) that suggests a law has been violated significantly expands this authority... One wonders how a citizen seeking to be law-abiding and to structure his or her behavior to avoid these invasive, frightening, and humiliating encounters could do so."

In other words, drivers beware!!!

Traffic stops are not just dangerous. They can be downright deadly.

Remember Walter L. Scott??

Reportedly pulled over for a broken taillight, Scott-unarmed-ran away from the police officer, who pursued and shot him from behind, first with a Taser, then with a gun. Mr. Scott was struck five times, "three times in the back, once in the upper buttocks and once in the ear - with at least one bullet entering his heart."

Samuel Dubose, also unarmed, was pulled over for a missing front license plate. He was reportedly shot in the head after a brief struggle in which his car began rolling forward.

Levar Jones was stopped for a seatbelt offense, just as he was getting out of his car to enter a convenience store. Directed to show his license, Jones leaned into his car to get his wallet, only to be shot four times by the "fearful" officer. Jones was also unarmed.

Bobby Canipe was pulled over for having an expired registration. When the 70-year-old reached into the back of his truck for his walking cane, the officer fired several shots at him, hitting him once in the abdomen.

Dontrell Stevens was stopped "for not bicycling properly." The officer pursuing him "thought the way Stephens rode his bike was suspicious. He thought the way Stephens got off his bike was suspicious." Four seconds later, sheriffs deputy Adams Lin shot Stephens four times as he pulled out a black object from his waistband. The object was his cell phone. Stephens was unarmed.

Sandra Bland, pulled over for allegedly failing to use her turn signal, was arrested after refusing to comply with the police officers order to extinguish her cigarette and exit her vehicle. The encounter escalated, with the officer threatening to "light" Ms Bland up with his taser. Three days later, Ms Bland was found dead in her jail cell. "You are doing all of this for a failure to signal?" Ms Bland asked as she got out of her car, after having been yelled at and threatened repeatedly.

Keep in mind, from the moment those lights start flashing and that siren goes off, we are all in the same boat. However, it is what happens after you have been pulled over that is critical.

Survival is key.

Technically, you have the right to remain silent (beyond the basic requirement to identify yourself and show your registration). You have the right to refuse to have your vehicle searched. You have the right to film your interaction with police. You have the right to ask to leave. You also have the right to resist an unlawful order such as a police officer directing you to extinguish your cigarette, put away your phone or stop recording them.

However, there is a price for asserting ones rights. That price grows more costly with every passing day.

If you ask cops and their enablers what United States of Americans should do to stay alive during encounters with police, they will tell you to comply, cooperate, obey, not resist, not argue, not make threatening gestures or statements, avoid sudden movements, and submit to a search of their person and belongings.

The problem, of course, is what to do when compliance is not enough.

After all, every day we hear about situations in which unarmed United States of Americans complied and still died during an encounter with police simply because they appeared to be standing in a "shooting stance" or held a cell phone or a garden hose or carried around a baseball bat or answered the front door or held a spoon in a threatening manner or ran in an aggressive manner holding a tree branch or wandered around naked or hunched over in a defensive posture or made the mistake of wearing the same clothes as a carjacking suspect (dark pants and a basketball jersey) or dared to leave an area at the same time that a police officer showed up or had a car break down by the side of the road or were deaf or homeless or old.

Now you can make all kinds of excuses to justify these shootings, and in fact that is exactly what you will hear from politicians, police unions, law enforcement officials and individuals who are more than happy to march in lockstep with the police.

However, to suggest that a good citizen is a compliant citizen and that obedience will save us from the police state is not only recklessly irresponsible, but it is also deluded and out of touch with reality!!!

To begin with, and most importantly, United States of Americans need to know their rights when it comes to interactions with the police, bearing in mind that many law enforcement officials are largely ignorant of the law themselves.

In a nutshell, the following are your basic rights when it comes to interactions with the police as outlined in the Bill of Rights:

You have the right under the First Amendment to ask questions and express yourself. You have the right under the Fourth Amendment to not have your person or your property searched by police or any government agent unless they have a search warrant authorizing them to do so. You have the right under the Fifth Amendment to remain silent, to not incriminate yourself and to request an attorney. Depending on which state you live in and whether your encounter with police is consensual as opposed to your being temporarily detained or arrested, you may have the right to refuse to identify yourself. Presently, 26 states do not require citizens to show their ID to an officer (drivers in all states must do so, however).

Knowing your rights is only part of the battle, unfortunately.

As I make clear in my book "Battlefield America: The War on the American People", the hard part comes in when you have to exercise those rights in order to hold government officials accountable to respecting those rights.

As a rule of thumb, you should always be sure to clarify in any police encounter whether or not you are being detained, i.e., whether you have the right to walk away.

That holds true whether it is a casual "show your ID" request on a boardwalk, a stop-and-frisk search on a city street, or a traffic stop for speeding or just to check your insurance.

If you feel like you can not walk away from a police encounter of your own volition-and more often than not you can not, especially when you are being confronted by someone armed to the hilt with all manner of militarized weaponry and gear-then for all intents and purposes, you are essentially under arrest from the moment a cop stops you.

Still, it does not hurt to clarify that distinction!!

While technology is always going to be a double-edged sword, with the gadgets that are the most useful to us in our daily lives-GPS devices, cell phones, the internet-being the very tools used by the government to track us, monitor our activities, and generally spy on us, cell phones are particularly useful for recording encounters with the police and have proven to be increasingly powerful reminders to police that they are not all powerful.

A good resource is The Rutherford Institutes "Constitutional Q&A: Rules of Engagement for Interacting with Police."

Clearly, in the United States of American police state, compliance is no guarantee that you will survive an encounter with the police with your life and liberties intact.

So if you are starting to feel somewhat overwhelmed, intimidated and fearful for your life and the lives of your loved ones, you should be!!!

Reprinted here with the gracious permission of "The Rutherford Institute" - Dedicated To The Defense Of Civil Liberties And Human Rights!!