How Many Times Must Mr. Assange Be Proven Right Before People Start Listening? By Caitlin Johnstone!!!!!
(2019-05-23 at 23:27:15 )

How Many Times Must Mr. Assange Be Proven Right Before People Start Listening? by Caitlin Johnstone

And there it is.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been charged by the President Trump administrations Justice Department with 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act, carrying a maximum sentence of 175 years in prison.

Exactly as Mr. Assange and his defenders have been warning would happen for nearly a decade.

The indictment, like the one which preceded it last month with Mr. Assanges arrest, is completely fraudulent, as it charges Mr. Assange with "crimes" that are indistinguishable from conventional journalistic practices.

The charges are based on the same exact evidence which was available to the Obama administration, which as journalist Glenn Greenwald noted last year declined to prosecute Mr. Assange citing fear of destroying press freedoms.

Hanna Bloch-Wehba, an associate professor at Drexel Universitys Thomas R. Kline School of Law, has called the indictment "a worst-case, nightmare, mayday scenario for First Amendment enthusiasts."

Ms Bloch-Wehba explains that that the indictments "theories for liability rest heavily on Mr. Assanges relationship with Ms Manning and his tendency to encourage Ms Manning to continue to bring WikiLeaks material" in a way that "is not readily distinguishable from many reporter-source relationships cultivated over a period of time."

One of the versions of the New York Times report on the new Mr. Assange indictment, which has since been edited out but has been preserved here in a quote by Slate, said that "officials would not engage with questions about how the actions they said were felonies by Mr. Assange differed from ordinary investigative journalism. Notably, The New York Times, among many other news organizations, obtained precisely the same archives of documents from WikiLeaks, without authorization from the government."

Press freedom organizations have been condemning these new espionage charges in stark and unequivocal language.

"Put simply, these unprecedented charges against Mr. Julian Assange and WikiLeaks are the most significant and terrifying threat to the First Amendment in the 21st century,”" reads a statement by Freedom of the Press Foundation Executive Director Trevor Timm.

"The Trump administration is moving to explicitly criminalize national security journalism, and if this prosecution proceeds, dozens of reporters at the New York Times, Washington Post and elsewhere would also be in danger.

The ability of the press to publish facts the government would prefer remain secret is both critical to an informed public and a fundamental right.

This decision by the Justice Department is a massive and unprecedented escalation in President Trumps war on journalism, and it is no exaggeration to say the First Amendment itself is at risk.

Anyone who cares about press freedom should immediately and wholeheartedly condemn these charges."

"The indictment of Mr. Julian Assange under the Espionage Act for publishing classified information is an attack on the First Amendment and a threat to all journalists everywhere who publish information that governments would like to keep secret," reads a statement by Committee to Protect Journalists Executive Director Joel Simon.

"Press freedom in the United States and around the world is imperiled by this prosecution."

"For the first time in the history of our country, the government has brought criminal charges under the Espionage Act against a publisher for the publication of truthful information," reads a statement by the ACLU.

"This is a direct assault on the First Amendment.

These charges are an extraordinary escalation of the President Trump administrations attacks on journalism, establishing a dangerous precedent that can be used to target all news organizations that hold the government accountable by publishing its secrets.

The charges against Mr. Assange are equally dangerous for United States journalists who uncover the secrets of other nations.

If the United States can prosecute a foreign publisher for violating our secrecy laws, there is nothing preventing China, or Russia, from doing the same."

Also opposing the new indictment, far too late, have been popular pundits from mainstream liberal news outlets.

"The Espionage indictment of Mr. Assange for publishing is an extremely dangerous, frontal attack on the free press. Bad, bad, bad," tweeted MSNBCs Chris Hayes.

"Today the President Trump Department Of Justice becomes the first administration to ever charge a publisher with -espionage- - an assertive, unprecedented legal crackdown on the traditional rights and protections for publishers," tweeted MSNBCs Ari Melber.

"That is a legal fact, regardless of ones views of Mr. Julian Assange.

The new Trump DOJ indictment treats activities most top newspapers engage in - gathering and publishing classified material - as criminal plotting, claiming Mr. Assange -conspired- with and -aided and abetted- his source in the pursuit of classified material."

One need only to look at the outraged "this is a horrible take" comments underneath these tweets to see that these condemnations are coming long after the propaganda they’ have helped advance against WikiLeaks has seeped well into the bloodstream.

It is impossible to tell the same group of people day after day that Mr. Assange is an evil Nazi Putin puppet rapist who smells bad and mistreats his cat, and then persuade them to respond to a depraved President Trump administration agenda against that same person with an appropriate level of resistance.

"I find no satisfaction in saying -I told you so- to those who for 9 years have scorned us for warning this moment would come," tweeted WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson.

"I care for journalism. If you share my feeling you take a stand NOW. Either you are a worthless coward or you defend Mr. Assange, WikiLeaks and Journalism."

Indeed, WikiLeaks staff and their supporters have been warning of this for many years, only to be dismissed as paranoid conspiracy theorists and rape apologists by smearers who insisted Mr. Assange was merely avoiding rape charges by taking asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London back in 2012.

There are many tweets by the WikiLeaks Twitter account warning that the United States is trying to charge Assange under the Espionage Act all the way back in 2010, and they have been warning about it over and over again ever since, but nobody is listened.

"The only barrier to Mr. Julian Assange leaving Ecuadors embassy is pride," blared a Guardian headline last year by the odious James Ball, with the sub-header "The WikiLeaks founder is unlikely to face prosecution in the United States, charges in Sweden have been dropped - and for the embassy, he has lost his value as an icon."

Mr. Assange has been warning for years that this was coming.

He has been unequivocal about the fact that he was perfectly willing to participate in the Swedish investigation from the beginning and was only taking asylum with Ecuador due to fear of extradition and political prosecution in the United States, which Ecuador explicitly stated were its reasons for granting him asylum.

He was absolutely correct.

He has been correct the entire time. History has vindicated him. He was right and his critics were wrong.

We are also already seeing Mr. Assange vindicated in his warnings of what his prosecution would mean for the free press.

He has not even been extradited yet and we are already seeing a greatly escalated war on journalism being implemented, with new developments in just the last few days like a San Francisco journalist now being charged with conspiracy for receiving internal documents from the San Francisco Police Department, and a prominent French journalist being summoned by police for reporting on corruption in the Macron government.

All this of course begs the question: what else has he been right about????

Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty who has previously had their doubts about Mr. Assange will necessarily begin asking themselves this question now.

It is worth reviewing the things Mr. Assange has been saying about Russia not being the source of the 2016 Democratic Party emails that WikiLeaks published, about what really happened in Sweden, and about his general understanding of what is going on in the world with opaque and unaccountable power structures leading us all down a very dark and dangerous path.

If you open your mind to the possibility that Mr. Assange has been right about more than you have given him credit for previously, the implications can shatter your world.

Give it a try.

There is no longer any legitimate reason not to.

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".