Pence Goes To War: America Will Be Fighting Forever bBy Philip Giraldi!!!
(2019-06-15 at 08:38:12 )

Pence Goes to War: America Will Be Fighting Forever by Philip Giraldi

On May 25th Vice President Mike Pence was the featured speaker at the United States Military Academy commencement.

His speech was predictably an encomium celebrating both the diversity and the success of the newly commissioned officers as well as of the system at West Point that had produced them, but it also included interesting insights into how he and the other non-veterans who dominate the policy making in the White House see the military.

Most media commentary on the speech was either shocked or pleasantly surprised by Mr. Pences prediction that the graduating officers would soon be at war.

He said "It is a virtual certainty that you will fight on a battlefield for the United States of America at some point in your life.

You will lead soldiers in combat.

It will happen.

Some of you will join the fight against radical Islamic terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Some of you will join the fight on the Korean Peninsula and in the Indo-Pacific, where North Korea continues to threaten the peace, and an increasingly militarized China challenges our presence in the region.

Some of you will join the fight in Europe, where an aggressive Russia seeks to redraw international boundaries by force.

And some of you may even be called upon to serve in this hemisphere.

And when that day comes, I know you will move to the sound of the guns and do your duty, and you will fight, and you will win.

The United States of American people expect nothing less.

So, wherever you are called, I urge you to take what you learned here and put it into practice.

Put your armor on, so that when - not if - that day comes, you will be able to stand your ground."

Mr. Pence may or may not have known that military academy graduates have only a five-year active duty commitment after graduation.

Many do not stay in the service after that point, instead using their security clearances and resumes to obtain well paying positions with defense and national security contractors.

If Mr. Pence was aware of that five-year window, he was implying that he expects multiple wars will involve the United States during his own remaining time in office, assuming that he and President Donald Trump are reelected in 2020.

He might even be assuming that war is inevitable no matter who is in the drivers seat in the White House because the United States of Americas numerous enemies, which he identified, cannot otherwise be dissuaded from their "nefarious behavior."

Mr. Pences choice of words is revealing.

There is a "virtual certainty" of "fight[ing] on a battlefield for the United States of America" and that battlefield is global, including both transnational Islamic terrorism and the western hemisphere.

The language implies that United States of American security requires "full spectrum dominance" everywhere.

It encompasses traditional national enemies, with a Pyongyang that "threatens peace," a China that is "militarized," and a Russia that is both "aggressive" and expansionistic.

The soldiers must be prepared to fight "when - not if - that day comes."

First of all, it is discouraging to note that Mr. Pence believes that a war or wars must take place, and further, one must have to wonder exactly what scenarios are envisioned by Mr. Pence, and also presumably by his boss and colleagues, regarding precisely how war against other nuclear powers will play out.

Nor does he entertain what would happen when the rest of the world begins to perceive the United States at its enemy due to its willingness to interfere in everyones politics.

And the United States of American soldiers would die not knowing what they were fighting for, since they would understand from the onset that it had nothing to do with the defense of the United States.

The speech is, in short, a recognition that the President Trump Administration sees perpetual war on the horizon, a viewpoint that is particularly alarming as one can quite easily make the case that the United States is not seriously threatened at all by anyone on Mr. Pences enemies list and is therefore the aggressor.

China is a regional power, Russia does not have the resources or will to reestablish the Soviet Union, and North Korea has only limited capability to attack anyone, even if it should choose to do so.

Islamic terrorism is largely a creation of the United States in the first place and maintains its potency by the adverse impact of the continued United States presence in Muslim lands.

And the suggestion that Venezuela and-or Cuba might be a threat to the United States of America is, quite frankly, laughable.

If Mr. Mike Pence is seriously interested in looking around to see who has been most interested in starting new wars, he should look to gentlemen named Bush and Obama, not to mention his own colleagues John Bolton and Mike Pompeo.

And then there are Washingtons feckless allies Israel and Saudi Arabia, who are keen to advance their own interests by means of piles of dead United States of American soldiers.

Is there no one around to question why exactly United States of American soldiers are sent to die in so many places that can hardly be found on a map?

Or to ask what the compelling national interests might be to require sending soldiers to such God-forsaken death pits?

One can be sure that the newly minted Army officers that Mr. Pence addressed have no desire to be killed in Mali, but it would take a brave young man or woman to speak the truth if asked by a senior officer.

And Mr. Pence unfortunately has many friends who believe in force majeure as he does on Capitol Hill.

Senator Lindsey Graham appeared on Fox News Sunday the day after the Vice President spoke and said "I would give Cuba an ultimatum to get out of Venezuela. If they do not, I would let the Venezuelan military know, you got to choose between democracy and Maduro, and if you choose Maduro and Cuba, we are coming after you. This is in our backyard."

It should be clearly understood Mr. Pence, Mr. Graham and Mr. Pompeo are all calling for wars of choice, where the military is being used as an option rather than diplomacy in a situation where there is no imminent threat.

Iraq, Syria and Libya are examples of such wars and all three have turned out very badly.

And then there is the moral dimension.

By the standard set by the Nuremberg Trials after World War 2, initiating an armed conflict in that fashion is a war crime.

Indeed, it is the ultimate war crime as it brings so many evils with it. Mr. Mike Pences vision of United States of America the perpetual war criminal is not something to be proud of!!

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.