"Good Guys" And "Bad Guys" Are A Hollywood Illusion By Caitlin Johnstone!!!
(2019-07-05 at 13:55:34 )

"Good Guys" And "Bad Guys" Are A Hollywood Illusion by Caitlin Johnstone

If you have spent literally any time arguing against western imperialism in any public forum, you have had the experience of being accused of "supporting" one of said imperialisms targets.

If you argue against regime change interventionism in Syria, you will get accused of being an "Assadist" or "Assad apologist".

If you argue against regime change interventionism in Iran, you will get people saying that you "support the Mullahs".

Enter into any debate of sufficient liveliness and it is only a matter of minutes before it happens.

There was a meme going around at the height of the most recent failed coup attempt in Venezuela depicting a white, pink-haired socialist placing their hand over the mouth of a dark-skinned Venezuelan and saying "ACKSHUALLY, MADURO IS THE GOOD GUY".

Proponents of the President Trump administrations attempts to topple the Venezuelan government would share this meme in online debates with anti-imperialists as a way of accusing them of whitesplaining to Venezuelans that they should support an evil dictator who is oppressing them.

The idea being, of course, to silence those dastardly socialists using the socially progressive value system they claim to uphold. Checkmate, leftists.

There are obviously a number of things that are wrong with this meme, including the skin pigmentation of the average Mr. Guaido supporter, the implication that all Venezuelans oppose Mr. Maduro, and the suggestion that only white western leftists oppose the Trump administrations attempts to install a puppet regime in the nation with the largest proven oil reserves on the planet.

But the dumbest thing about it is the implication that someone who opposes United States regime change interventionism could only be doing so because they believe that Nicolas Maduro is a "good guy".

The reason debates about western imperialism so frequently get bogged down by moronic arguments about “"good guys" and "bad guys" is because human storytelling devices train us from an early age to constantly frame narratives in those terms.

Everything we have been taught by TV and movies tells us that if a conflict is happening, someone in it must be the protagonist and someone must be the antagonist, and that our job is to figure out which one is which.

For as long as humans have been telling stories, this is how they have been doing it.

A hero wants something, has some kind of adventure trying to get it, but a villain tries to stop them.

It is a recipe for exciting storytelling that has been used since time immemorial, and it works because the standard human ego is structured to spin mental narratives about itself as the central character whose wants are constantly being fulfilled by friendlies and thwarted by hostiles.

Almost every story from the earliest prehistoric campfire circles to the latest Hollywood blockbuster has in essence been nothing other than a storyteller using a simple mind hack to attract the interest and attention of their audience, just by making their narrative relatable using the protagonist-antagonist framework which the ego finds so appealing.

We are always the hero in our little ego narratives about our day-to-day lives.

We like people who do things we want and we dislike people who do things we do not want.

We stand transfixed by our babbling mental ego narratives, so we find any similar external narrative mesmerising in the same way.

But it is just an illusion.

There are no "good guys" or "bad guys" in real life, either in our personal lives or in international affairs.

There are just people.

Some of those people do things we like more often than they do things we do not like, and vice versa, but that is not a matter of whether they are "good" or "bad", it is a matter of our personal preferences and how we think people ought to behave.

"Good" or "bad" is not written on anyone’s DNA or inscribed above their heads upon the fabric of reality; we made it up.

In reality, it is very possible to oppose United States regime change interventionism in Venezuela without having a single thought ever appear in your head about whether or not Nicolas Maduro is a "good guy".

United States of American-led regime change interventionism has a well-documented and historically undeniable history of increasing suffering and death in the nations in which it takes place, and consistently fails to accomplish what its proponents claim it will.

You do not need to have any opinions about who Mr. Maduro is as a person to recognize this self-evident fact and oppose yet another United States regime change campaign in yet another oil-rich nation.

To preempt the inevitable Godwins law counter-argument here, of course it is useful to discern individual behavior patterns in people and talk about what specific patterns they tend to exhibit.

Of course it is useful to recognize that Hitler did many things that we should always oppose going forward.

But notice how the only reason Godwin’s law exists is because the "good guys versus bad guys" dichotomy allows people to associate anyone who opposes their side with Hitler, thereby marking them as the "bad guy" side in a given debate.

That is all anyone who fulfils Godwins law is ever trying to do.

It is very useful to pay attention to the specific behavior patterns of specific individuals, and to make distinctions as to whether or not those behavior patterns are desirable or undesirable to you.

But it is also very useful to understand how the "good guys vs bad guys" dichotomy is leveraged by those who seek to control our thoughts and perceptions.

Think about it:: where are we trained to look for heroes in real life?

Soldiers and policemen, the violent enforcers of the status quo.

Politicians like Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, depending on which side of the fake partisan divide you are on.

And where are we trained to look for villains?

Dictators and rule-breakers, and people who are on the other side of the illusory partisan divide.

Awful convenient for those who benefit from maintaining the status quo, no?

There is one direction in which we are very seldom trained to look for a superhero to come to the rescue, and that is within.

The notion that we ourselves might be the real agents of change in this world is downplayed by the propagandists who fear a surge in populism more than they fear anything else in this world.

Much better to keep people focused on polarizing figures like Donald Trump, who most people seem incapable of viewing as anything other than either a Deep State-fighting superhero or a Hitler-like supervillain whose actions are either all pure good or all pure evil.

Divorced from the "good guys vs bad guys”" dichotomy, this administrations behavior can be described in the same way as its predecessors: mostly supportive of the violent and increasingly Orwellian pillars of empire, with a few helpful things mixed in. Yet it is rare to find anyone who is capable of discussing President Trump outside of the false dichotomy.

And the same would be more or less true of whoever President Trump winds up running against in 2020.

Even if by some miracle Bernie Sanders or Tulsi Gabbard overcome the rightward-slanted DNC nomination process and go on to beat President Trump in the general election, they will with absolute certainty advance many of the destructive agendas upon which the United States empire is built.

They are not heroes either.

This does not mean they are villains, it just means that "heroes versus villains" is an illusion we have been trained since our earliest media-consuming days to buy into.

The world makes a lot more sense when you peel away the lens from your eyes which perceives life in neat little Hollywood-shaped narratives with protagonists and antagonists and clear beginnings, middles and ends.

Because it turns out that we are all actually a bunch of confused primates doing the best we can with the wildly unique and incredibly complex sets of conditioning we have been dealt by our individual birth circumstances and life events.

The "good guys versus bad guys" dichotomy is just imaginary conceptual overlay on top of a giant biological storm which carries on in cool indifference to our puny little egocentric narratives.

Atoms swirl, cells cluster, and life lifes away as this strange new species stumbles around trying to make sense of the world with its recently evolved extra gray matter and the capacity for abstract thought which comes with it.

It has some successes and many failures in trying to figure out how to make living on this spinning rock a little more harmonious, and it will either succeed or it will fail.

It is egoically comfortable to slice this dance up into a narrative about heroes and villains, good guys and bad guys, but it is really all one twirling, churning, chaotic and beautiful dance.

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".