Menu
Paynal © 2008
The Failure of Impeachment Regime Change by Jacob G. Hornberger !
(2019-07-25 at 16:57:05 )
The Failure of Impeachment Regime Change by Jacob G. Hornberger
With what most everyone is calling a stunningly disjointed and extremely disappointing presentation before Congress by Special Counsel and former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller, it is becoming increasingly clear that the effort to achieve regime change through impeachment is going to fail.
Democrats are going to have to rely on the traditional electoral means to remove President Trump from office in 2020.
This is the way it should be. Achieving regime change through impeachment would have converted the United States into a standard banana republic.
Ever since Donald Trump became the GOP nominee for president, Democrats, the national-security establishment, and the liberal elements of the mainstream press did everything they could to ensure that his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, was elected president.
Once Donald Trump became president, however, his opponents refused to accept the electoral outcome and began trying to remove him from office through impeachment.
That is where the anti-Russia brouhaha came into play.
During the campaign, it was increasingly clear that Trump and Clinton were on opposite sides of the Russia controversy. Trump desired to establish friendly relations with Russia, which was exactly what Russia wanted.
But that is not what the national-security establishment wanted.
Ever since the sudden and unexpected end of the Cold War, the Pentagon,the Central Intelligence Agency, and National Security Agency - the three principal components of the national-security state - did everything they could to make Russia, once again, an official enemy of the United States. Ms Clinton was squarely on the side of the national-security establishment.
That is why the Pentagon, CIA, and NSA kept the Cold War dinosaur NATO in existence instead of dismantling it.
It is also why they had NATO begin absorbing former members of the Warsaw Pact, enabling United States forces and missiles to be stationed ever closer to the Russian border, violating assurances that United States officials had given Russia not to expand toward Russia.
That is what the effort to absorb Ukraine into NATO was all about, knowing full well that Russia would respond by protecting its longtime military base in Crimea.
Everything was oriented toward making certain that the United States and Russia would never be on friendly terms.
Everything was instead oriented toward making Russia, once again, another Cold War official enemy of the United States.
Why is that the goal of the national-security establishment?
Because it needs a justification for its own existence and its own ever-growing power and influence.
That justification comes in the form of official enemies, ones that can keep Americans fearful.
In that way, the Pentagon, CIA, and NSA can say, "Keep flooding us with United States taxpayer money because we are the ones who are keeping you safe from Americas official enemies.
Keep giving us totalitarian-like powers over you so that we can keep you safe."
Of course, Russia is not the only official enemy.
There is also China, which increasingly is being presented as a Cold War-like "hegemon" that is supposedly threatening United States "national security."
And then there are the smaller official enemies, like Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, the Taliban, the Muslims, the terrorists, ISIS, the drug dealers, and the illegal immigrants, all of which, we are told, are threats to "national security."
As a candidate, Donald Trump was threatening to upend this racket, at least with respect to Russia and perhaps also by threatening to bring an end to Americas forever wars and its policy of regime-change wars.
That posed a grave threat to the national-security establishment, which had been grafted onto Americas federal governmental system after World War II to fight the Cold War against the Soviet Union, Americas World War II partner and ally whose principal member was Russia.
Donald Trumps friendly attitude toward Russia could not be permitted to stand, not as a presidential candidate and especially not as a United States president.
That is when the anti-Russia brouhaha was launched, which accused Donald Trump of being an agent of the Russians, just as some people accused President Eisenhower of being a communist agent of the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
It was a ridiculous accusation from the get-go but its primary purpose was to enable President Trumps opponents to remove him from office long before the next election in 2020.
It was designed to be regime change through impeachment.
Once Mr. Muellers investigative team, despite years of intense investigation, was unable to come up with convincing evidence of a Trump-Russia conspiracy, however, Trumps detractors fell back on a secondary plan for regime change though impeachment - "obstruction of justice," a federal crime that is so nebulous and subjective that it is the federal version of "disorderly conduct," a "crime" that local officials use to target people they do not like.
The sham nature of this alternative theory for regime change was exposed through its supporters refusal to seek President Trumps impeachment for real crimes, such as killing people overseas through illegal undeclared wars and illegal assassinations.
With Mr. Muellers dismal performance before Congress, this alternative attempt at regime change appears to be dead in the water as well.
While President Trumps enemies have been unsuccessful in removing him from office through impeachment, they have, unfortunately, been successful in having him become an opponent of Russia, China, and all of the other official enemies of the United States national-security state.
Not only has President Trump continued the forever wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East, he has kept up hostile relations with Russia, initiated a destructive trade war with China, and ratcheted up the United States wars on Muslims, the terrorists, the illegal immigrants, the drug dealers, ISIS, and the Taliban.
He has also ensured that ever-increasing taxpayer-funded largess continues flooding into the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA, no matter how much more debt this adds onto the backs of United States of American taxpayers.
In other words, President Trump, like George W. Bush and Barack Obama, has been absorbed into the national-security state blob.
They have won.
President Trump has become one of them.
That is the real success of the unsuccessful effort to remove Trump from office through impeachment regime change.
Reprinted here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Great Website!!