Israels Hands Spread Wide and Dig Deep by Brian Cloughley!
(2019-08-06 at 20:08:44 )

Israels Hands Spread Wide and Dig Deep by Brian Cloughley

In the United States House of Representatives on 23 July there was an overwhelming vote condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement which has the objective of encouraging the government of Israel to meet "its obligation to recognize the Palestinian peoples inalienable right to self-determination and fully comply with the precepts of international law by: 1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall; 2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and 3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in United Nations resolution 194."

There is nothing morally or legally questionable in any of these aims.

But the United States Congress does not concern itself with morality or legality if these are inconsistent with its policy concerning Israel, which, as enunciated by Representative Lee Zeldin of New York, is based on the conviction that "Israel is our best ally in the Mid East; a beacon of hope, freedom & liberty, surrounded by existential threats." Fox News reported that the condemnatory resolution "has been pushed by AIPAC, the influential Israel lobby in Washington," which explains a great deal, as AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is a very powerful organisation, with deep pockets and wide-spreading hands.

In February 2019 The Intercept noted that "AIPAC, on its own website, recruits members to join its -Congressional Club,- and commit to give at least $5,000 per election cycle."

In a film called The Lobby "Eric Gallagher, a top official at AIPAC from 2010 to 2015, tells an Al Jazeera reporter that AIPAC gets results." A secret recording revealed that "Getting $38 billion in security aid to Israel matters, which is what AIPAC just did. Everything AIPAC does is focused on influencing the United States Congress."

And AIPAC influences Congress and other agencies extremely efficiently, even to the extent of managing to have Al Jazeera refrain from broadcasting the United States-focused version of The Lobby.

The Director of Al Jazeeras Investigative Unit, Clayton Swisher, said that pressure included "pro-Israel lobbyists in Washington threatening to convince the United States Congress to register the network as -foreign agents,- and false accusations of anti-Semitism against the producers of the documentary."

That is all you need: the mere mention of anti-Semitism makes everyone suck their teeth, roll their eyes, and leap out of the way.

It so happened that the day before the United States Congress condemned an initiative aimed at having Israel recognise the rights of Palestinians and abide by international law, the Israelis carried out an operation of destruction that was specifically aimed against the rights of Palestinians and was contrary to international law.

As the BBC reported, it involved 200 Israeli soldiers and 700 police, weapons at the ready, deploying to the Palestinian village of Wadi Hummus at 4 in the morning of July 22, along with bulldozers and excavators that proceeded to destroy Palestinian homes.

There was not a word of objection from the United States Administration whose Tweeter-in-Chief had made his views on Israel crystal-clear on 16 July when he announced that the four non-white female Members of Congress whom he loathes to the point of psychosis are "a bunch of Communists [who] hate Israel."

Moreover, they "talk about Israel like they are a bunch of thugs, not victims of the entire region."

On the other hand, the European Union stated that "Israels settlement policy, including actions taken in that context, such as forced transfers, evictions, demolitions and confiscations of homes, is illegal under international law. In line with the EUs long-standing position, we expect the Israeli authorities to immediately halt the ongoing demolitions." Fat chance of that - just as there is no possibility that the United states or the United Kingdom will support pursuit of international law when it is violated by Israel.

Britain is on its way out of the European Union, so has no say in EU policy, but in any case it would not agree about criticism of Israel because the governing Conservative Party fosters an organisation called -Conservative Friends of Israel- (CFI) whose members constitute some eighty per cent of Conservative Members of Parliament.

Boris Johnson, Britains Trump-loving new prime minister, is a fervid supporter of CFI which supported him in his bid to be head of the Conservative party.

On 23 July, after his selection to be leader and thus prime minister, the CFIs Chairmen, Stephen Crabb MP and Lord Pickles, and Honorary President Lord Polak declared that "From his refusal to boycott Israeli goods in his time as Mayor of London through to his instrumental role as Foreign Secretary.. Boris has a long history of standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and the Jewish community. Mr Johnson continued to display his resolute support.. reiterating his deep support for Israel and pledging to be a champion for Jews in Britain and around the world."

One of Johnsons first ministerial appointments was of Ms Priti Patel to be Home Secretary.

She had resigned from the Cabinet of PM Theresa May in November 2017 because it had been discovered that she had been telling lies, which was not in itself unusual, but the circumstances were intriguing.

As the BBC headlined about the then head of International Development : "Priti Patel quits cabinet over Israel meetings row" which involved her apologising to the prime minister "after unauthorised meetings in August with Israeli politicians - including prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu - came to light.

But it later emerged she had two further meetings without government officials present in September." Not only that, but in a media interview "she gave the false impression that the foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, and the Foreign Office knew about her meetings in Israel."

It is one of these irregular verbs which were met with much laughter during the marvellous BBC series -Yes Minister- and -Yes, Prime Minister- - -I make a misstatement; she gives a false impression; he is in prison for telling lies.-

And it was decidedly strange that the egregious Lord Polak, he of the statement that Boris Johnson stands "shoulder to shoulder with Israel" accompanied Patel at 13 of her 14 meetings with Israeli officials during August and September. What on earth could have been going on?

Of course she had no reason to worry about having to resign for telling lies, because at the time of her disgrace Boris Johnson told the BBC that "Priti Patel has been a very good colleague and friend for a long time and a first class secretary of state for international development. It has been a real pleasure working with her and I am sure she has a great future ahead of her." The man has the gift of prophecy.

Then Johnson appointed Michael Gove to his Cabinet as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, which is a weird appointment that gives a lot of power and very little responsibility. Gove had been demonstrably disloyal to Johnson during the first leadership struggle, in what the Daily Telegraph called a "spectacular act of treachery" but all was forgiven because, as recorded approvingly by the Conservative Friends of Israel he believes that anti-Zionism and antisemitism are "two sides of the same coin", which means that anybody who criticises Israels nationalistic persecution of Palestinians is an anti-Semite. He believes that "the test for any civilised society is whether it stands with the Jewish people, and whether it stands with Israel. It is a pleasure to stand with the Jewish people. It is a duty to stand with Israel."

The Palestinians are not going to get one tiny bit of support from either the United States or Britain when their houses are bulldozed to rubble. They can expect no criticism from Washington or London when their children are killed in Gaza by Israeli soldiers.

The West Bank of the Jordan River, between Israel and Jordan, was captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war.

Then it annexed East Jerusalem.

Both areas are defined in international law as occupied territory.

Although this is ignored by the United States and Britain it was intriguing that in a minor but telling legal finding in Canada on 30 July, a judge ruled that wines made in Jewish settlements in the West Bank should not carry labels that say "Product of Israel" because of course the settlements are built on Palestinian land.

But there is no point in telling that to the Israeli-supporting wine connoisseur Donald Trump or the United States Congress or any member of Britains governing Conservative party, because international law means nothing when there are other priorities.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.