How To Make Sense Of Foreign Protests, Conflicts And Uprisings by Caitlin Johnstone!
(2019-08-26 at 23:24:31 )

How To Make Sense Of Foreign Protests, Conflicts And Uprisings by Caitlin Johnstone

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation, our government-funded media outlet, has published an article titled "Australian expat living in Hong Kong throws off business suit to join protest movement".

The entire story is in the headline: some random guy, who ABC keeps anonymous but for the name "Daniel", has joined the protests in Hong Kong. That is it. That is the whole entire bombshell newsworthy news story.

"In Australia we have proper democracy but in Hong Kong, democracy is being slowly eroded away and I will try to do whatever I can to try and help the cause," the anonymous guy told ABC.

This sort of enthusiastic empty non-story cheerleading is typical for western media coverage of the Hong Kong protests so far, while these same media outlets consistently ignore or downplay protests against the government of France, Israel, Honduras, India, Indonesia and any other region that happens to fall within the United States-centralized power alliance.

It is an amazingly reliable pattern: the entire western political-media class finds protests and uprisings endlessly fascinating when they are in opposition to governments which have not yet been absorbed into the imperial blob like China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, pre-collapse Libya, or then-Moscow-aligned Ukraine, but any protests or uprisings within that empire are ignored at best or demonized at worst.

If dissidents in the United States began donning yellow vests and holding aggressive demonstrations in the current media environment, you could safely bet your bottom dollar that they would be ignored for as long as possible and then smeared as fascists, antisemites and-or Russian pawns thereafter. This would happen with absolute certainty.

This very reliable trend in the western media is very interesting, because it also happens to be the known position of the United States State Department.

In 2017 a memo was leaked to Politico in which the sniveling John Bolton lackey Brian Hook explained to DC neophyte Rex Tillerson how to perform his job as Secretary of State with regard to human rights violations.

Mr. Hook explained that the United States government must downplay and ignore the human rights violations of United States allies like Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Philippines while aggressively targeting unabsorbed governments like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea for any allegations of human rights violations on their part.

"In the case of United States allies such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Philippines, the Administration is fully justified in emphasizing good relations for a variety of important reasons, including counter-terrorism, and in honestly facing up to the difficult tradeoffs with regard to human rights," Mr. Hook explained in the memo.

"One useful guideline for a realistic and successful foreign policy is that allies should be treated differently - and better - than adversaries," Mr. Hook wrote. "Otherwise, we end up with more adversaries, and fewer allies. The classic dilemma of balancing ideals and interests is with regard to Americas allies. In relation to our competitors, there is far less of a dilemma. We do not look to bolster Americas adversaries overseas; we look to pressure, compete with, and outmaneuver them. For this reason, we should consider human rights as an important issue in regard to United States relations with China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran."

This State Department memo is really all you need to understand about what is going on whenever there is any kind of uprising or conflict in a foreign nation.

Hell, it is almost all you need to understand the dynamics of empire in general.

And, combined with the consistent pattern we have seen in coverage of protests and uprisings against empire-absorbed governments versus unabsorbed ones, it certainly tells you all you need to know about the state of the western media.

In theory the United States Department of State was meant to serve as a counterpart to what was then called the Department of War (later falsely re-titled the "Department of Defense"). In theory the State Department was meant to specialize in peace and diplomacy in the same way the War Department specialized in war.

In practice the warmongers just got two war departments.

Understand this one basic concept and you can understand all the hot topic foreign policy issues of any given day: there is an alliance of nations, centralized around United States military and economic power, which effectively functions as a single empire.

This empire works tirelessly to either absorb unabsorbed governments into its blob, or at least to undermine and marginalize them so they can not impede the empires growth.

The goal of the empire is total global domination without causing a nuclear war and without the public noticing that they are living in an empire. In this sense it is essentially a silent, slow motion third world war.

I see some of my readers voicing confusion about the protests in Hong Kong, but if you understand the basic dynamic I just described you will see that this is really no different from the protests and uprisings we have seen in Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Libya and Ukraine: the western political-media class are backing an uprising which benefits the imperial blob and undermines an unabsorbed government.

This does not mean that the protesters do not have grievances or that none of those grievances are legitimate, it just means that you are being told to cheerlead for an agenda by empire narrative managers solely because your doing so benefits that empire.

So do not.

Refuse to be a pro bono Central Intelligence Agency propagandist.

This does not mean you need to oppose the protesters in Hong Kong, Venezuela or anywhere else, it just means that the only people who benefit from westerners cheerleading a Central Intelligence Agency-approved uprising against an unabsorbed government are your rulers, who work endlessly to manufacture support for pro-empire agendas.

People who do not get this sometimes tell me that we should "support" the protesters in a given unabsorbed region, but they are always very reluctant to say what they mean by "support".

Do they mean simply joining the western mass media in uncritically cheerleading for an uprising which benefits western power structures?

Do they mean send them money? Weapons? An emotional thumbs-up? Prayers?

Getting someone to say what they mean when they say we should "support" the Hong Kong protesters or whomever is like pulling teeth, because it would bring up a lot of cognitive dissonance to actually turn and examine what is behind the impulse they are following: narrative management.

They are promoting pro-empire narrative management, and nothing more. And they are doing this because the empire narrative managers trained them to.

"Centrist" empire loyalists tend to ignore the protests in places like France while amplifying and cheerleading the protests in places like Hong Kong.

Right-wing empire loyalists sometimes do it a little differently, actively conflating the Yellow Vests protests with protests in places like Hong Kong despite the very different forces that are at play in those two situations.

But in both cases they are effectively mirroring the same State Department posture that Brian Hook tried to educate into Rex Tillerson in 2017.

Do not subject yourself to such indignities. If the political-media class is going to propagandize the masses into supporting the advancement of the agendas of the empire, at least make them do it without your help.

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".