The Bill of Rights Turns 230, and What Do We Have to Show for It? Nothing Good By John W. Whitehead!
(2019-09-10 at 11:35:16 )

The Bill of Rights Turns 230, and What Do We Have to Show for It? Nothing Good By John W. Whitehead

"That was when they suspended the Constitution. They said it would be temporary. There was not even any rioting in the streets. People stayed home at night, watching television, looking for some direction. There was not even an enemy you could put your finger on."-Margaret Atwood, The Handmaids Tale

It has been 230 years since James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights-the first ten amendments to the Constitution-as a means of protecting the people against government tyranny, and what do we have to show for it?

Nothing good.

In the United States America today, the government does whatever it wants, freedom be damned.

We can pretend that the United States Constitution, which was written to hold the government accountable, is still our governing document, but the reality of life in the United States of American police state tells a different story.

"We The People" have been terrorized, traumatized, and tricked into a semi-permanent state of compliance by a government that cares nothing for our lives or our liberties.

The bogeymans names and faces have changed over time (terrorism, the war on drugs, illegal immigration, etc.), but the end result remains the same: in the so-called named of national security, the United States Constitution has been steadily chipped away at, undermined, eroded, whittled down, and generally discarded to such an extent that what we are left with today is but a shadow of the robust document adopted more than two centuries ago.

Most of the damage has been inflicted upon the Bill of Rights.

A recitation of the Bill of Rights-set against a backdrop of government surveillance, militarized police, SWAT team raids, asset forfeiture, eminent domain, overcriminalization, armed surveillance drones, whole body scanners, stop and frisk searches (all sanctioned by the United States Congress, the White House, the courts and the like)-would understandably sound more like a eulogy to freedoms lost than an affirmation of rights we truly possess.

Here is what it means to live under the Constitution today.

The First Amendment is supposed to protect the freedom to speak your mind, assemble and protest nonviolently without being bridled by the government. It also protects the freedom of the media, as well as the right to worship and pray without interference. In other words, United States of Americans should not be silenced by the government. To the founders, all of America was a free speech zone.

Despite the clear protections found in the First Amendment, the freedoms described therein are under constant assault.

Increasingly, United States of Americans are being arrested and charged with bogus "contempt of cop" charges such as "disrupting the peace" or "resisting arrest" for daring to film police officers engaged in harassment or abusive practices.

Journalists are being prosecuted for reporting on whistleblowers.

States are passing legislation to muzzle reporting on cruel and abusive corporate practices.

Religious ministries are being fined for attempting to feed and house the homeless.

Protesters are being tear-gassed, beaten, arrested and forced into "free speech zones." And under the guise of "government speech," the courts have reasoned that the government can discriminate freely against any First Amendment activity that takes place within a government forum.

The Second Amendment was intended to guarantee "the right of the people to keep and bear arms." Essentially, this amendment was intended to give the citizenry the means to resist tyrannical government.

Yet while gun ownership has been recognized by the United States Supreme Court as an individual citizen right, United States of Americans remain powerless to defend themselves against SWAT team raids and government agents armed to the teeth with military weapons better suited for the battlefield. As such, this amendment has been rendered null and void.

The Third Amendment reinforces the principle that civilian-elected officials are superior to the military by prohibiting the military from entering any citizens home without "the consent of the owner."

With the police increasingly training like the military, acting like the military, and posing as military forces-complete with heavily armed SWAT teams, military weapons, assault vehicles, etc.-it is clear that we now have what the founders feared most-a standing army on United States of American soil.

The Fourth Amendment prohibits government agents from conducting surveillance on you or touching you or invading you, unless they have some evidence that you are up to something criminal.

In other words, the Fourth Amendment ensures privacy and bodily integrity.

Unfortunately, the Fourth Amendment has suffered the greatest damage in recent years and has been all but eviscerated by an unwarranted expansion of police powers that include strip searches and even anal and vaginal searches of citizens, surveillance (corporate and otherwise) and intrusions justified in the name of fighting terrorism, as well as the outsourcing of otherwise illegal activities to private contractors.

The Fifth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment work in tandem. These amendments supposedly ensure that you are innocent until proven guilty, and government authorities cannot deprive you of your life, your liberty or your property without the right to an attorney and a fair trial before a civilian judge.

However, in the new suspect society in which we live, where surveillance is the norm, these fundamental principles have been upended.

Certainly, if the government can arbitrarily freeze, seize or lay claim to your property (money, land or possessions) under government asset forfeiture schemes, you have no true rights.

The Seventh Amendment guarantees citizens the right to a jury trial.

Yet when the populace has no idea of what is in the Constitution-civic education has virtually disappeared from most school curriculums-that inevitably translates to an ignorant jury incapable of distinguishing justice and the law from their own preconceived notions and fears.

However, as a growing number of citizens are coming to realize, the power of the jury to nullify the governments actions-and thereby help balance the scales of justice-is not to be underestimated.

Jury nullification reminds the government that "We The People" retain the power to ultimately determine what laws are just.

The Eighth Amendment is similar to the Sixth in that it is supposed to protect the rights of the accused and forbid the use of cruel and unusual punishment.

However, the Supreme Courts determination that what constitutes "cruel and unusual" should be dependent on the "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" leaves us with little protection in the face of a society lacking in morals altogether.

The Ninth Amendment provides that other rights not enumerated in the United States Constitution are nonetheless retained by the people.

Popular sovereignty-the belief that the power to govern flows upward from the people rather than downward from the rulers-is clearly evident in this amendment.

However, it has since been turned on its head by a centralized federal government that sees itself as supreme and which continues to pass more and more laws that restrict our freedoms under the pretext that it has an "important government interest" in doing so.

As for the Tenth Amendments reminder that the people and the states retain every authority that is not otherwise mentioned in the United States Constitution, that assurance of a system of government in which power is divided among local, state and national entities has long since been rendered moot by the centralized Washington, DC, power elite-the president, the Congress and the courts.

Indeed, the federal governmental bureaucracy has grown so large that it has made local and state legislatures relatively irrelevant.

Through its many agencies and regulations, the federal government has stripped states of the right to regulate countless issues that were originally governed at the local level.

If there is any sense to be made from this recitation of freedoms lost, it is simply this: our individual freedoms have been eviscerated so that the governments powers could be expanded.

Yet those who gave us the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights believed that the government exists at the behest of its citizens. It is there to protect, defend and even enhance our freedoms, not violate them.

It was no idle happenstance that the United States Constitution opens with these three powerful words: "We The People." As the Preamble proclaims:

-We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this CONSTITUTION for the United States of America.

In other words, we have the power to make and break the government. We are the masters and they are the servants.

We the American people-the citizenry-are the arbiters and ultimate guardians of Americas welfare, defense, liberty, laws and prosperity.

Still, it is hard to be a good citizen if you do not know anything about your rights or how the government is supposed to operate.

As the National Review rightly asks, "How can Americans possibly make intelligent and informed political choices if they do not understand the fundamental structure of their government?

United States of American citizens have the right to self-government, but it seems that we increasingly lack the capacity for it."

Americans are constitutionally illiterate.


Most citizens have little, if any, knowledge about their basic rights. And our educational system does a poor job of teaching the basic freedoms guaranteed in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

For instance, when Newsweek asked 1,000 adult United States citizens to take Americas official citizenship test, 44% were unable to define the Bill of Rights.

A survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center found that a little more than one-third of respondents (36 percent) could name all three branches of the United States government, while another one-third (35 percent) could not name a single one.

Only a quarter of Americans (27 percent) know it takes a two-thirds vote of the House and Senate to override a presidential veto.

One in five Americans (21 percent) incorrectly thinks that a 5-4 Supreme Court decision is sent back to Congress for reconsideration.

And more than half of United States of Americans do not know which party controls the House and Senate.

A survey by the McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that only one out of a thousand adults could identify the five rights protected by the First Amendment.

On the other hand, more than half (52%) of the respondents could name at least two of the characters in the animated Simpsons television family, and 20% could name all five.

And although half could name none of the freedoms in the First Amendment, a majority (54%) could name at least one of the three judges on the TV program American Idol, 41% could name two and one-fourth could name all three.

It gets worse.

Many who responded to the survey had a strange conception of what was in the First Amendment.

For example, 21% said the "right to own a pet" was listed someplace between "Congress shall make no law" and "redress of grievances."

Some 17% said that the First Amendment contained the "right to drive a car," and 38% believed that "taking the Fifth" was part of the First Amendment.

Teachers and school administrators do not fare much better.

A study conducted by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis found that one educator in five was unable to name any of the freedoms in the First Amendment.

In fact, while some educators want students to learn about freedom, they do not necessarily want them to exercise their freedoms in school.

As the researchers conclude, "Most educators think that students already have enough freedom, and that restrictions on freedom in the school are necessary.

Many support filtering the Internet, censoring T-shirts, disallowing student distribution of political or religious material, and conducting prior review of school newspapers."

Government leaders and politicians are also ill-informed.

Although they take an oath to uphold, support and defend the United States Constitution against "enemies foreign and domestic," their lack of education about our fundamental rights often causes them to be enemies of the Bill of Rights.

So what is the solution?


Thomas Jefferson recognized that a citizenry educated on "their rights, interests, and duties" is the only real assurance that freedom will survive.

As Mr. Jefferson wrote in 1820: "I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of our society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power."

From the President on down, anyone taking public office should have a working knowledge of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights and should be held accountable for upholding their precepts.

One way to ensure this would be to require government leaders to take a course on the United States Constitution and pass a thorough examination thereof before being allowed to take office.

Some critics are advocating that students pass the United States citizenship exam in order to graduate from high school.

Others recommend that it must be a prerequisite for attending college.

I would go so far as to argue that students should have to pass the citizenship exam before graduating from grade school.

Here is an idea to get educated and take a stand for freedom: anyone who signs up to become a member of The Rutherford Institute gets a wallet-sized Bill of Rights card and a Know Your Rights card. Use this card to teach your children the freedoms found in the Bill of Rights.

If this constitutional illiteracy is not remedied and soon, freedom in the United States of America will be doomed.

As I make clear in my book "Battlefield America: The War on the American People", we have managed to keep the wolf at bay so far. Barely.

Our national priorities need to be re-prioritized.

For instance, some argue that we need to make the United States of America great again.

I, for one, would prefer to make the United States of America free again.

As actor-turned-activist Richard Dreyfuss warned:

-"Unless we teach the ideas that make the United States of America a miracle of government, it will go away in your kids lifetimes, and we will be a fable. You have to find the time and creativity to teach it in schools, and if you do not, you will lose it.

You will lose it to the darkness, and what this country represents is a tiny twinkle of light in a history of oppression and darkness and cruelty.

If it lasts for more than our lifetime, for more than our kids lifetime, it is only because we put some effort into teaching what it is, the ideas of the United States of America: the idea of opportunity, mobility, freedom of thought, freedom of assembly."

Reprinted here with the gracious permission of "The Rutherford Institute" - Dedicated To The Defense Of Civil Liberties And Human Rights!!