Syria Between the Ottoman Hammer and the Israeli Anvil by Elias Samo!
(2019-10-06 at 10:07:42 )

Syria Between the Ottoman Hammer and the Israeli Anvil by Elias Samo

Syria, uncomfortably and vulnerably, finds itself sandwiched between the Ottoman hammer to the North and the Israeli anvil to the South.

Both power houses are, hostile, expansionist and occupy Syrian territory.

When one thinks of a "safe zone" along the Syrian-Turkish border on the Syrian side, one is reminded of the American-Mexican border. Both borders face a similar security situation: one state faces security threats emanating from the neighboring state.

The American-Mexican border has long been a source of security concerns in Washington,D.C. due to the influx of illegal Latin American immigrants, known pejoratively as the "wet backs" - as they would get wet crossing the Rio Grande River to the United States mainland.

To deal with border security, Donald Trump did not consider establishing a "safe zone" on the Mexican side of the border, for such a zone would have to be occupied and ruled by the United States of American military, in violation of international law and Mexicos sovereign and territorial integrity. Instead, President Trump decided to build a wall on the United States of American side of the border to alleviate the security threat.

Similarly, Mr. Erdogan views the concentration of anti-Turkish armed Kurds, whom he considers terrorists, on the Syrian side of the Syrian-Turkish border, a threat to Turkeys national security.

However, he does not think a wall is good enough to deal with the Kurdish threat. He opted, ironically with President Trumps blessings and partnership, to establish a 400 kilometers long - and at the moment still undecided depth - "safe zone", on the Syrian side of the border, East of the Euphrates to the Iraqi border, in violation of international law and Syrian sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Mr. Erdogans insistence on having Turkish boots in the zone, in Syria, is a military occupation. A similar process West of the Euphrates covering the remaining segment of the Syrian-Turkish border, according to Mr. Erdogan, will eventually complete 800 kilometers long "Ottoman Belt".

Mr. Erdogan is determined and impatient to have the zone established and have Turkish boots on the ground. Recently, in a speech in Istanbul, he said "We do not have much time or patience regarding the security zone which will be established along our complete border, East of the Euphrates, in a few weeks. If our soldiers do not start actual control of the area, there will not be any option except the implementation of our plans." Mr. Erdogan choosing the zone rather than the wall raises a serious question about Mr. Erdogans real and ultimate intention and plans. If it is not the wall, it is not security; if it is the zone, it is occupation, similar to the Northern Cyprus precedent.

Mr. Erdogan has three objectives regarding the establishment of a safe zone; two declared short range and a third undeclared long range. The first objective is security; the withdrawal of the armed Kurdish groups from the zone, a process which appears to have started. The second objective is resettling the Turkey-based Syrian refugees in the zone. The third and insidious objective is potentially reclaiming Syrian territory which was occupied by the Ottomans for 400 years, until the end of World War I. It should be noted that the 800 kilometers Syrian-Turkish border was based on the Sykes-Picot Agreement and drawn after WWI and the demise of the Ottoman Empire; it is not a historic nor natural border. A substantial part of the border is the Orient Express rail track, built by German Christians to be the border between two antagonistic Muslim states and not to the liking of either.

Mr. Erdogan is using a double strategy in dealing with the great powers to implement his three objectives. With Europe, it is blackmail. He either gets European support, or he will facilitate shipping hundreds of thousands of refugees to Europe. With Washington,D.C. and Moscow, it is "the other woman". I recall the Israeli-Palestinian and the Israeli-Syrian peace negotiations in the early 1990s. Whenever the Israelis did not get their way in one track, they would hint of reverting to the other track; so is the case with Mr. Erdogan vis-a-vis Washington,D.C. and Moscow.

As for southern Syria, although Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Erdogan overtly appear antagonist, they in fact share one common objective which is to squeeze and occupy Syrian territory.

In the pursuit of their objectives, both rely on questionable historical claims and power differential between Syria on the one hand and Turkey and Israel on the other.

Mr. Netanyahus annexation of the occupied Golan on the basis of questionable historical claims and President Trumps blessings is not objectionable to Mr. Erdogan despite his pretentious public protestations.

The Ottomans occupied Syria for 400 years and Mr. Netanyahu claims the Golan historically belongs to Israel.

Both Turkey and Israel have "recovered" part of what they believe was theirs; Turkey "recovered" Syrian Alexandretta district in 1939 and Israel "recovered" two thirds of the Syrian Golan in the 1967 War and one assumes that both would like to "recover" more.

There is an old Arab proverb: The camels nose is in the tent. Turkish tanks and soldiers are in northern Syria; Israeli military and settlements are in the Golan.

The ultimate irony is that Syria, the eternal, the cradle of civilization and the home of the three monotheistic religions, has become a prey to the Ottoman and Israeli empires.

What a travesty; a treachery.

However, take note, Syria is not a pushover, nor is it alone.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.