How the Deep State "Justifies" Itself in the United States of America by Eric Zuesse!
(2019-11-06 at 16:40:59 )

How the Deep State "Justifies" Itself in the United States of America by Eric Zuesse

On October 30th, there was a panel discussion broadcast live on C-Span from the National Press Club and the Michael V. Hayden Center.

The discussants were John Brennan, Michael McCabe, John McGlaughlin, and Michael Morrell. They all agreed with the statement by Mr. McLaughlin (former Deputy Central Intelligence Agency Director) "Thank God for the -Deep State-", and the large audience there also applauded it - nobody booed it.

John Brennan amplified upon the thought, and there was yet more applause. However, that thought had not been invented by Mr. McLaughlin; it instead had evolved recently in the pages of the New York Times. Perhaps the discussants had read it there.

Instead of the United States of Americas "news"-media uncritically trumpeting what government officials assert to be facts (as they traditionally do), we now have former spooks uncritically trumpeting what a mainstream "news"-medium has recently concocted to be the case - about themselves.

They have come out of the closet, about being the Deep State. However, even in that, they are lying, because they are not it; they are only agents for it.

In the United States of America, the Deep State "justifies" itself in the "news"-media that it owns, and does so by falsely -defining- what the "Deep State" is (which is actually the nations 607 billionaires, whose hired agents number in the millions).

They mis-"define" it, as being, instead, the taxpayer-salaried career Government employees, known professionally as "the Civil Service." (Although some Civil Servants - especially at the upper levels - are agents for the United States of Americas billionaires and retire to cushy board seats, most of them actually are not and do not.

And the "revolving door" between "the public sector" and "the private sector" is where the Deep State operations become concentrated.

That is the core of the networking, by which the billionaires get served. And, of course, those former spooks at the National Press Club said nothing about it.

Are they authentically so stupid that they do not know about it, or is that just pretense from them?)

How the Deep States operatives perpetrate this deception about the meaning of "Deep State" was well exemplified in the nine links that were supplied on October 28th by the extraordinarily honest anonymous German intelligence analyst who blogs as "Moon of Alabama" and who condemned there (and linked to) 9 recent articles in the New York Times, as posing a threat against democracy in the United States of America.

As I intend to argue here, the 9 articles are, indeed, aimed at deceiving the United States of American public, about what the true meaning of the phrase "the Deep State" is.

He headlined "Endorsing The Deep State Endangers Democracy". (And that is what the October 30th panel discussion was actually doing - endorsing the Deep State.)

However, he did not explain the tactic the NYTs editors (and those former spooks) use to deceive the public about the Deep State, and this is what I aim to do here, by showing the transformation, over time, in the way that that propaganda-organization, the New York Times, has been employing the phrase "Deep State" - a remarkable transformation, which started, on 16 February 2017, by the newspapers denying that any Deep State exists in the United States of America but that it exists only in corrupt nations; and which gradually transitioned into an upside-down, by asserting that a Deep State does exist in the United States, and that it fights against corruption in this country.

As always, only fools (such as that applauding audience on October 30th) would believe it, but propagandists depend upon fools and cannot thrive without them.

In this case, the Times, in those 9 articles, was evolving quickly from a blanket denial, to an United States of American-exceptionalist proud affirmation, that a Deep State rules this country and ought to rule it.

I agree with the statement that "Endorsing The Deep State Endangers Democracy", but I am more concerned here to explain how that endorsement - that deceit - is being done.

The first of these NYT articles was published on 16 February 2017, and it denied that the United States has any "Deep State" whatsoever.

The second, published on 6 March 2017, blamed President Trump (since the NYT represents mainly Democratic Party billionaires) for mainstreaming the phrase "the Deep State" into United States of American political discourse, and it alleged that that phrase actually refers only to "countries like Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan, where authoritarian elements band together to undercut democratically elected leaders."

The third, published on 10 March 2017, repeated this allegation, that this phrase applies only to "the powerful deep states of countries like Egypt or Pakistan, experts say."

The fourth, published on 5 September 2018, was an anonymous op-ed from a Government employee who condemned Donald Trump and "vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations." "This is not the work of the so-called deep state. It is the work of the steady state." So: still the NYTs editors were hewing to their propaganda-line, that no "Deep State" exists in the United States of America - there are just whistleblowers, here.

The fifth, on 18 December 2018, said, for example, that "Adam Lovinger, a Pentagon analyst, was one of the first to wrap himself in the deep state defense" - namely, that they consist of "people who have been targeted for political reasons." So, the NYTs editors were now reinforcing their new false "definition" of "Deep State," as consisting just of Government whistleblowers.

The sixth, on 6 October 2019, said, "President Trump and some of his allies have asserted without evidence that a cabal of United States of American officials - the so-called deep state - embarked on a broad operation to thwart Mr. Trumps campaign. The conspiracy theory remains unsubstantiated." So: the NYTs editors were back, again, to denying that there is any "Deep State" in the United States of America. This was a signal, from them, that they were starting to recognize that they would need to jiggle their "definition" of "Deep State," at least a bit.

The seventh, on 20 October 2019, was by a member of the Editorial Board, and it boldly proclaimed, about "the deep state," "Let us now praise these not-silent heroes." The propagandists now had settled firmly upon their new (and previously merely exploratory) "definition" of "Deep State," as consisting of whistleblowers in the United States Governments Civil Services, "individuals willing to step up and protest the administrations war on science, expertise and facts."

The eighth, on 23 October 2019, equated "the deep state" even more boldly with the impeachment of President Trump: "Over the last three weeks, the deep state has emerged from the shadows in the form of real live government officials, past and present, who have defied a White House attempt to block cooperation with House impeachment investigators and provided evidence that largely backs up the still-anonymous whistle-blower."

The ninth, on 26 October 2019, which came from "a contributing opinion writer and professor of history," alleged that the origins of "the deep state" are to be found with Teddy Roosevelt in the 1880s, when "A healthy dose of elitism drove Roosevelts crusade, as the spoils system had been the path to power for immigrant-driven political machines in big cities like New York. Yet the Civil Service laws he and others created marked the beginning of a shift toward a fairer, less corrupt public realm."

In other words: the Deep State, in the United States of America, are not perpetrators of corrupt government (such as in "countries like Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan, where authoritarian elements band together to undercut democratically elected leaders"), but are instead courageous enemies of corrupt government; and they are instituted by the aristocracy here (todays United States ofAmerican billionaires), in order to reduce, if not eliminate, corruption in government (which, the Times now alleges, originates amongst, or serves, the lower classes).

The lessons about Big Brother, which were taught by George Orwell in his merely metaphorical masterpiece 1984, were apparently never learned, because even now - as his "Newspeak" is being further refined so that black is white, and good is bad, and truth is falsehood - there still are people who subscribe to the propagandists and cannot get enough of their ridiculous con-games.

Though in some poor countries, a corrupt Deep State rules; a Deep State rules in the United States of America so as to reduce if not prevent corruption, the New York Times now concludes.

You can see how it is done, in those nine NYT articles.

Is it not simply amazing there?!

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.