Trump Declared Anti-Ukrainian Racist by Clownish Mainstream Media by Tim Kirby!
(2019-11-09 at 11:22:01 )

Trump Declared Anti-Ukrainian Racist by Clownish Mainstream Media by Tim Kirby

Donald Trump has been accused of racism since the moment he decided to run as a Republican, but The Washington Post is pushing this narrative one step farther, claiming that the President of the United States is so blinded by his own "loathing" for Ukraine, that he is blowing critical United States of American foreign policy opportunities in that nation.

CNN has also jumped on the propaganda bandwagon declaring that Donald Trump has a "disdain" for the Ukraine that is "raising alarm bells". Trump does not have an irrational hatred for Ukrainians and there is nothing in this region to be gained which has not already been achieved in recent years.

"WaPos" bizarre and utterly irrational condemnation of Trump begins with the following statement..

-"Three of President Trumps top advisers met with him in the Oval Office in May, determined to convince him that the new Ukrainian leader was an ally deserving of United States support."

Ukraines leadership has no choice but to be an ally of the United States, much in the same way that India had to be allies of Britain during Queen Victorias reign.

Ukraine is a vassal entity whose near future will be determined by Washington and-or Moscow. Ukraine is too battered and poor and infiltrated by both greater powers to actually have any real self-determination, meaning that there is no need for Donald Trump or any other President to woo Kiev.

The region is now almost completely under Washington,D.C.s control thanks to the United States meddling that was the cause for the Maidan and the war in the Donbass.

The "powers that be" in Kiev push a hardcore anti-Russian-pro-EU-pro-Western agenda because they have to serve masters who got them into power, this is only natural.

Presenting the Ukraine as a sovereign nation that needs to be won over to Americas side is a complete lie and a slap in the face to The Washington Posts readership. But this is only the beginning…

-"They had barely begun their pitch when Donald Trump unloaded on them, according to current and former United States officials familiar with the meeting.

In Donald Trumps mind, the officials said, Ukraines entire leadership had colluded with the Democrats to undermine his 2016 presidential campaign."

The words "In Trumps mind.." imply that his beliefs of Ukrainian influence against his campaign are completely made up and irrational.

Basically the big hint is that Donald Trumps fears are paranoia-delusional, which could be true if fake dirt had not actually been directly thrown onto Donald Trumps campaign manager Paul Manafort from Ukraine.

The implication that Donald Trump has just dreamt up a conspiracy against himself from around the Dnieper is factually proven to be untrue.

-"So far, a dozen witnesses have testified before House lawmakers since the closed-door impeachment inquiry began a month ago. One theme that runs through almost all of their accounts is Donald Trumps unyielding loathing of Ukraine, which dates to his earliest days in the White House."

No examples of these tweets were supplied (Trump is known to be very loose with his tweets so this very well could be fully true) but you can see in this statement that there is a heavy handed hinting that a dislike of the status quo in Kiev is now a form of hatred and racism.

This is the most cheap and basic way to try to get a politician to shut up - using the "if you do not approve of X, then you are a racist against X", which sadly very often works.

A "loathing" for some Israeli policy makes one anti-Semitic, a "disdain" for sending United States troops to die in countries with odd names means you are against the troops or at the very least unpatriotic.

But thankfully for the President of the United States, unlike Israel or "The Troops", no one actually cares about the Ukraine outside of the Beltway.

Furthermore, if Donald Trump had been projecting a blazing hatred towards everything Russian over the last few years, no one would be accusing him of Russophobia.

The Washington Posts wretched hypocrisy in this article can me smelled from over the ocean.

-"Inside the administration, Donald Trumps top advisers debated the origins of his ill-feeling. Some argued that Donald Trump saw Ukraine as an impediment to better United States relations with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, who was angry about United States sanctions imposed on Moscow for its annexation of Crimea and for the Kremlins ongoing support of pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine."

If the Russians took away the entire South of the United States, put a puppet government into power that is fanatically anti-American that then killed thousands of its own citizens (i.e. Americans) one would sure see that as an "impediment" to better United States-Russian relations.

Ukraine is a blip on the radar for the United States of America but for Russia it is basically the holy land from which it was born and an inalienable part of its civilization.

Russia can be Russia without Tajikistan, but not without the Ukraine and Belarus. The horrors in the Donbass witnessed by many Russian-speakers that reminded them of the atrocities committed by the Nazis on the Eastern Front will not be soon be forgotten and make a submissive compromise situation a non-option.

Thus, unless Washington,D.C. throws away half of its current territorial control of Ukraine to the Russians (i.e. the regions that are strongly pro-Russian) there is no chance of reaching some sort of resolution that will improve United States-Russian relations.

"Trumps entire national security Cabinet unanimously supported it. But Donald Trump hesitated. "He kept saying it.. was not worth pissing off Russia and what a bad country Ukraine was," said the former senior White House official.”

If we take the time to reformat this question we can see where Donald Trump could be coming from - "is it worth risking WWIII over a region of the world that means nothing to the United States of America (or the West) and everything to the Russians?".

Protecting United States of American territory from the Russians is important, protecting the West as a whole is also worth it, but funneling buckets of money into an endless Ukrainian hole on former Russian territory will not yield anything positive for the United States of America.

"None of those lofty arguments worked with Donald Trump.

"Many Americans feel strongly about supporting Ukraine because it is the little guy and is fighting for values we consider fundamentally the United States of America"

There are more United States of Americans who are concerned over plastic straws and the rights of men in dresses to pee in the womens room than the Ukrainian situation.

American men often voluntarily signed up for WWII and to a lesser extent Vietnam to fight a real ideological threat to the USA.

How many guys would register for the draft over the Donbass? The overwhelming majority of Americans do not care about the fate of Kiev and why should they?

Fundamentally this primitive article by The Washington Post, is one long blunt implication that if Donald Trump does not want to use American resources to push for maintaining a firm grasp on a heavily anti-Russian Ukraine then he is a racist bad person or at the very least is heavily misguided and irrational due to hurt feelings from his election campaign.

The Washington Post demonstrates in this piece the mentality of a Medieval peasant - if you do not agree with me then you must be evil or possessed by demons blinding your judgment.

This publications motto is "Democracy dies in Darkness" but their attitude towards the President having a viewpoint they do not like is straight out of the Dark Ages.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.