Menu
Paynal © 2008
Why I Do Not Talk More About 9-11-01 by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2019-12-12 at 03:14:59 )
Why I Do Not Talk More About 9-11-01 by Ms Caitlin Johnstone
For some reason 9-11-01 keeps coming up in my online interactions with people lately, both with establishment loyalists who call me a "9-11-01 truther" and with skeptics who say I do not write enough about what really happened on that day 18 years ago.
So I figured I will bang out a few quick paragraphs on the subject in the interest of transparency, and so I do not have to keep having the same conversations over and over again.
My position on 9-11-01 itself is pretty simple: I do not know exactly what happened on the eleventh of September 2001, and I think anyone who claims to know with absolute certainty exactly what happened is fulla shit.
But it is also extremely obvious that the world was lied to about what happened by the United States government and its allies, as evidenced by the massive, glaring plot holes in the official 9-11-01 narrative.
The most concise and rock-solid compilation of these plot holes that I have ever seen was compiled by conspiracy analyst James Corbett in this five-minute video and its accompanying source notes. Mr. Corbett made this video eight years ago on the tenth anniversary of 9-11-01, and to this day I believe it is the strongest and most irrefutable case against the official narrative.
I have never once seen anyone even attempt to refute Mr. Corbetts video, because as an argument it is completely unassailable.
The brilliant thing about it is that, while it is called "9-11-01: A Conspiracy Theory", all it actually contains is the official narrative about how the alleged Al-Qaeda conspiracy to attack United States buildings with jet planes is officially theorized to have taken place, per the establishment narrative.
Mr. Corbett simply tells the story, exactly as it exists in mainstream discourse, but he tells the full story all at once while omitting the part where the storyteller tries to make it all sound perfectly reasonable and plausible. When you hear the official narrative repeated in this way, it is transparently self-evident that the public has not been told the truth.
So why do I not talk about this more?
It seems like it is right in my wheelhouse, right?
9-11-01 was used to manufacture consent for multiple wars in a highly suspicious way that just so happened to align with preexisting imperial geostrategic agendas, and if everyone could understand that they were deceived by their own government and media about something so important, the entire evil empire would come crashing down. Based on all my other writings you would assume this would be something I would be focused on facilitating.
But I do not. I very rarely mention 9-11-01 except in passing. There are two reasons for this:
Firstly, the narrative control battle has already been decisively won by the other side. The mainstream understanding is that anyone who talks about what really happened on 9-11-01 is a crazy crackpot who must not be listened to, because the establishment narrative control campaign to discredit and demonize critical thinking on the subject succeeded many years ago.
If todays ubiquitous internet access had happened to coincide with 9-11-01 and the grassroots push to find out the truth behind it, that narrative control would have been far more difficult if not impossible for the establishment to shore up. But the timing did not work out that way, and now the narrative is fully locked down except in the margins of discourse which have no effect on the mainstream.
Secondly, even if there were some way to show everyone in the western world the truth of what happened on 9-11-01, the establishment propaganda machine would immediately narrative manage the problem away.
The operation would be blamed on rogue actors, maybe a few powerful establishment loyalists would face consequences (though probably not) and be replaced with other establishment loyalists, and then the imperial propaganda machine would pace everyone into an understanding of why it is still right and necessary to support the United States-centralized empire and its globe-sprawling war machine.
The status quo would march on essentially undisturbed. This is one hundred percent guaranteed as long as the empire still has a functioning propaganda engine.
This is why I focus on attacking the establishment propaganda machine using clear, undeniable arguments against which people have not been preemptively prejudiced by narrative management campaigns, in a way that people can verify independently for themselves.
As I explain in my article "How To Defeat The Empire", people can only hope to oust the oppression machine by using the power of their numbers to do so, and they will not use the power of their numbers to do so as long as they are successfully propagandized.
The way to kill the empires ability to propagandize people is not to run up to them saying things they have already been conditioned to view as bat shit insane, it is to help them see in their own experience that those outlets are behaving in an untrustworthy way here and now.
Distrust in the mass media is already at an all-time high, so all it takes is a little nudge in the right direction.
That is where I choose to pour my energy.
Not into attacking a heavily-armored narrative about something that happened 18 years ago, but into independently verifiable deceptions happening here and now like the mass medias conspiracy of silence on the OPCW scandal, Bellingcats easily debunked lies, and the various deceitful narratives used to manufacture consent for the imprisonment of Julian Assange.
I can point to these things in a way that people will actually get curious about and look into for themselves, rather than slamming the cognitive door with a conditioned reflexive "LOL shut up truther."
It is good and right to ask questions about 9-11-01, but that is a rabbit hole that only opens up for people when it opens up for them.
You can not force people to jump down it.
Believing I should keep pushing 9-11-01 truth on principle because they lied to us about something evil is like believing I should keep bashing my face into a brick wall on principle because it should not be there rather than simply walking around and going through the open door.
Anyway, that is the conclusion my experience and study of this puzzle has brought me to. I am open to changing my mind at a later date, but that is what seems the most effective way to fight the machine for the time being.
Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.
My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".