The Fake Impeachment: Ms Pelosis Botched Ploy Helps Mr. Trump Towards Victory by Joaquin Flores!!
(2019-12-22 at 09:23:18 )

The Fake Impeachment: Ms Pelosis Botched Ploy Helps Mr. Trump Towards Victory by Joaquin Flores

And so it came to pass, that in the deep states frenzy of electoral desperation, the "impeachment" card was played.

The hammer has fallen.

Nearly the entirety of the legacy media news cycle has been dedicated to the details, and not really pertinent details, but the sorts of details which presume the validity of the charges against Donald Trump in the first place.

Yes, they all beg the question.

What is forgotten here is that the use of this process along clearly partisan lines, and more - towards clearly partisan aims - is a very serious symptom of the larger undoing of any semblance of stability in the United States government.

The fact that the impeachment is dead in the water, by Ms Pelosis own admission, is evident in Donald Trumps being adamant that indeed it must be sent to the Senate - where he knows he will be exonerated.

But even if it does not go to the Senate, what we are left with still appears as a loss for Democrats. Both places are his briar patch.

This makes all of this a win-win for team Trump.

Only in a country that produces so much fake news at the official level, could there be a fake impeachment procedure made purely for media consumption, with no real or tangible possible victory in sight.

For in a constitutional republic like the United States, what makes an impeachment possible is when the representatives and the voters are in communion over the matter.

This would normally be reflected in a mid-term election, like say for example the mid-term Senatorial race in 2018 where Democrats failed to take control.

Control of the Senate would reflect a change of sentiment in the republic, which in turn and not coincidentally, would be what makes for a successful impeachment.

Do not forget, this impeachment is fake

Nancy Pelosi is evidently extraordinarily cynical.

Her politics appears to be "they deserve whatever they believe".

And her aim appears to be the one who makes them believe things so that they deserve what she gives them. For little else can explain the reasoning behind her claim that she will "send the impeachment to the Senate" as soon as she "has assurances and knows how the Senate will conduct the impeachment", except that it came from the same person who told the public regarding Obamacare that we have to "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.".

In both cases, reality is turned on its head - for rather we will know how the Senate intends to conduct its procedure as soon as it has the details, which substantively includes the impeachment documents themselves, in front of them, and likewise, legislators ought to know what is in a major piece of legislation before they vote either way on it. Ms Pelosis assault on reason, however, is not without an ever growing tide of resentment from within the progressive base of the party itself.

We have quickly entered into a new era which increasingly resembles the broken political processes which have struck many a country, but none in living memory a country like the United States.

Now elected officials push judges to prosecute their political opponents, constitutional crises are manufactured to pursue personal or political vendettas, death threats and rumors of coups coming from media and celebrities being fed talking points by big and important players from powerful institutions.

This "impeachment" show really takes the cake, does it not?

We will recall shortly after Donald Trump was elected, narrator for hire Morgan Freeman made a shocking public service announcement.

It was for all intents and purposes, a PSA notifying the public that a military coup to remove Donald Trump would be legitimate and in order.

Speaking about this PSA, and recounting what was said, would in any event read as an exaggeration, or some allegorical paraphrasing made to prove a point. Jogging our memories then, Mr. Freeman spoke to tens of millions of viewers on television and YouTube saying:

"We have been attacked. We are at war. Imagine this movie script: A former KGB spy, angry at the collapse of his motherland, plots a course for revenge - taking advantage of the chaos, he works his way up through the ranks of a post-soviet Russia and becomes.. president.

He establishes an authoritarian regime, then he sets his sights on his sworn enemy - the United States.

And like the KGB spy that he is, he secretly uses cyber warfare to attack democracies around the world. Using social media to spread propaganda and false information, he convinces people in democratic societies to distrust their media, their political processes, even their neighbors. And he wins."

This really set the tone for the coming years, which have culminated in this manufactured "impeachment" crisis, really befitting a banana republic.

It would be the height of dishonesty to approach this abuse of the impeachment procedure as if until this moment, the United States own political culture and processes were in good shape.

Now is not the time for the laundry list of eroded constitutional provisions, which go in a thousand and one unique directions.

The United States political system is surely broken, but as is the case with such large institutions several hundreds of years old, its meltdown appears to happen in slow motion to us mere mortals.

And so what we are seeing today is the next phase of this break-down, and really ought to be understood as monumental in this sense.

Once again revealed is the poor judgment of the Democratic Party and their agents, tools, warlords, and strategists, the same gang who sunk Hillary Clintons campaign on the rocks of hubris.

Nancy Pelosi also has poor judgment, and these short-sighted and self-interested moves on her part stand a strong chance of backfiring.

Her role in this charade is duly noted.

This is not said because of any disagreement over her aims, but rather that in purely objective terms it just so happens that her aims and her actions are out of synch - that is unless she wants to see Donald Trump re-elected.

Her aims are her aims, our intention is to connect these to their probable results, without moral judgments.

The real problem for the Democrats, the DNC, and any hopes for the White House in 2020, is that this all has the odor of a massive backfire, and something that Donald Trump has been counting on happening.

When ones opponent knows what is probable, and when they have a track record for preparing very well for such, it is only a question of what Donald Trumps strategy is and how this falls into it, not whether there is one.

Imagine being a fly on the wall of the meeting with Ms Pelosi where it was decided to go forward with impeachment in the House of Representatives, despite not having either sufficient traction in the Senate or any way to control the process that the Senate uses.

It probably went like this: "We will say we impeached him, because we did, and we will say he was impeached. We will declare victory, and go home. This will make him unelectable because of the stigma of impeachment. "

Informed citizens are aware that whatever their views towards Donald Trump, nothing he has done reaches beyond the established precedent set by past presidents.

Confused citizens on the other hand, are believing the manufactured talking points thrown their way, and the idea that a United States president loosely reference a quid pro quo in trying to sort a corruption scandal in dealings with the president of a foreign country, is some crazy, new, never-before-done and highly-illegal thing.

It is none of those things though.

Unfortunately, not needless to say, the entirety of the direct, physical evidence against Donald Trump solely consists of the now infamous transcript of the phone call which he had with Ukrainian president Zelensky.

The rest is hearsay, a conspiracy narrative, and entirely circumstantial.

As this author has noted in numerous pieces, Mr. Bidens entire candidacy rests precisely upon his need to be a candidate so that any normal investigation into the wrongdoings of himself or his son in Ukraine, suddenly become the targeted persecution of a political opponent of Donald Trump.

Other than this, it is evident that Mr. Biden stands little chance - the same polling institutions which give him a double-digit lead were those which foretold a Clinton electoral victory.

Neither their methods nor those paying and publishing them, have substantively changed. Mr. Bidens candidacy, like the impeachment, is essentially fake. The real contenders for the partys base are Mr. Sanders and Ms Gabbard.

The Democratic Party Activist Base Despises Ms Pelosi as much as Ms Clinton

The Democratic Party has two bases, one controlled by the DNC and the Clintons, and one which consists of its energized rank-and-file activists who are clearer in their populism, anti-establishment and ant-corporate agenda.

Candidates like Ms Gabbard and Mr. Sanders are closest to them politically, though far from perfect fits.

Their renegade status is confirmed by the difficulties they have with visibility - they are the new silent majority of the party.

The DNC base, on the other hand, relies on Rachel Maddow, Wolf Blitzer, and the likes for their default talking points, where they have free and pervasive access to legacy media.

In the context of increased censorship online, this is not insignificant.

Among the important reasons this "impeachment" strategy will lose is that it will not energize the second and larger base.

Even though this more progressive and populist base is also more motivated, they have faced - as has the so-called alt-light - an extraordinarily high degree of censorship on social media.

Despite all the censorship, the Democrats silent majority are rather well-informed people, highly motivated, and tend to be vocal in their communities and places of work. Their ideas move organically and virally among the populace.

This silent majority has a very good memory, and they know very well who Nancy Pelosi is, and who she is not.

The silent majority remembers that after years of the public backlash against Mr. Bushs war crimes, crimes against humanity, destruction of remaining civil liberties with the Patriot Act, torture, warrantless search - and the list goes on and on - Democrats managed to retake the lower house in 2006.

If there was a legitimate reason for an impeachment, it would have been championed by Ms Pelosi against Mr. Bush for going to war using false, falsified, manufactured evidence about WMD in Iraq.

At the time, Ms Pelosi squashed the hopes of her own electorate, reasoning that such moves would be divisive, that they would distract from the Democrats momentum to take the White House in 2008, that Mr. Bush had recently (?) won his last election, and so on.

Of course these were real crimes, and the reasons not to prosecute may have as much to do with Ms Pelosis own role in the war industry.

Ms Pelosi could not really push against Mr. Bush over torture, etc. because she had been on an elite congressional committee - the House Intelligence Committee - during the Bush years in office which starting in 2003 was dedicated to making sure that torture could and would become normalized and entirely legal.

It seems Ms Pelosi can not even go anywhere with this impeachment on Donald Trump today, and therefore does not even really plan to submit it to the Senate for the next stage. The political stunt was pulled, a fireworks show consisting of one lonely rocket that sort of fizzled off out of sight.

Donald Trump emerges unscathed, and more to the point, we are closer to the election and his base is even more energized.

Ms Pelosi spent the better part of three years inoculating the public against any significance being attached to any impeachment procedure.

Ms Pelosi cried wolf so many times, and Donald Trump has made good on the opportunities handed to him to get his talking points in order and to condition his base to receive and process the scandals in such and such way.

This would not have been possible without Ms Pelosis help. Thanks in part to Ms Pelosi and the DNC, President Donald Trump appears primed for re-election.

President Trump energizes his base, and the DNC suppresses and disappoints theirs.

That is where the election will be won or lost.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.