Why I Do Not Criticize Russia, China, Or Other Unabsorbed Governments by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2019-12-29 at 22:49:05 )

Why I Do Not Criticize Russia, China, Or Other Unabsorbed Governments by Ms Caitlin Johnstone

Depending on whose political echo chamber I happen to be arguing with on a given day, one common criticism I run into a fair bit which many of my readers have surely also encountered is that I put all my energy into criticizing the foreign policy of the United States and its allies.

"You are not anti-war, you are only anti-AMERICAN wars!" they say, as though they are delivering some kind of devastating slam-dunk point. "If you are so antiwar, why do you not criticize Mr. Assads war in Syria? If you are such an anti-imperialist, show me where you have ever once criticized Russian imperialism, or Chinese imperialism?"

The argument being that someone who opposes United States-led warmongering is not really motivated by a desire for peace and an opposition to war unless they are also voicing opposition to all other violent governments in the world.

If you are only criticizing United States imperialism and not the imperialism of other nations, you must be motivated by something far more sinister, perhaps a hatred for the United States of America.

I have three responses to this feeble line of argumentation, which I will list here for the benefit of anyone else who would like to make use of them:

1. People making this argument never apply its own logic to themselves.

Nobody criticizes all misdeeds by all governments everywhere in the world. If you run into someone making this "you have to criticize all bad governments or your criticisms are invalid" argument on Twitter, just do an advanced search for their Twitter handle plus "Duterte" or "Sisi" or one of the other United States-allied tyrants who the mainstream media have not spent years demonizing, and you will find that they have never made a single mention of those leaders the entire time they have had that account.

What this proves, of course, is that they do not actually practice the belief that all misdeeds by all governments are equally worthy of condemnation. What they actually practice is the belief that one ought to criticize the governments they hear their television criticizing: Russia, China, Syria, Iran, etc. The governments the United States State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency do not like. The disobedient governments. The governments which have resisted absorption into the blob of the United States-centralized empire.

They do not put the logic of their own argument into practice because it is impossible to put into practice. Everyones only got so much time in the day, so you have to choose where to put your focus. I personally choose to put my focus on the single most egregious offender in warmongering and imperialism. Which takes us to:

2. The United States empire is by far the worst warmongering imperialist force on the planet.

United States-led regime change interventionism is literally always disastrous and literally never helpful. This is an indisputable fact. Imperialists get very frustrated when I take my stand there in arguments online, because it is an unassailable position. That is usually when the ad hominems start flying.

All things are not equal. This is not something you should have to explain to grown adults, but such is the nature of propaganda.

It is true that other governments do evil things; as far as I can tell this becomes pretty much a given as soon as a government is allowed to have a military force and keep important secrets from its citizenry. Obviously Russia, China and other unabsorbed governments are no exception to this rule. But the United States is worse, by orders of magnitude.

No other nation comes anywhere remotely close.

No other nation is circling the planet with hundreds of military bases and engaged in dozens of undeclared military operations.

No other nation has cultivated a giant globe-sprawling empire in the form of tightly knit alliances with powerful murderous governments like the United Kingdom, Israel and Saudi Arabia.

No other nation is constantly laboring to sabotage and undermine any government which refuses to be absorbed into military and economic alliance with it using sanctions, staged coups, covert Central Intelligence Agency operations, color revolutions, economic manipulations, propaganda, the arming of dissident militias, and launching full-scale military invasions.

Only the United States and the nations that its cancerous empire has metastasized into are doing anything like that on anywhere near the scale.

So since I, like everyone else, only have enough time in the day to oppose so many different evils in the world, I choose to pour my energy into opposing the single most egregious offender.

An offender which does not get nearly enough opposition, in my opinion.

3. I have a special responsibility for the evils of the empire in which I live.

When asked in an interview why he spends the bulk of his time criticizing his own government, Noam Chomsky replied:

"My own concern is primarily the terror and violence carried out by my own state, for two reasons. For one thing, because it happens to be the larger component of international violence. But also for a much more important reason than that: namely, I can do something about it.

So even if the United States was responsible for 2% of the violence in the world instead of the majority of it, it would be that 2% I would be primarily responsible for. And that is a simple ethical judgment.

That is, the ethical value of ones actions depends on their anticipated and predictable consequences. It is very easy to denounce the atrocities of someone else. That has about as much ethical value as denouncing atrocities that took place in the 18th century."

When people here in Australia ask about what I do for a living, I sometimes jokingly tell them I write about Australian foreign policy, which means that I write about United States foreign policy.

I have written many times about how Australia functions as Washington,D.C.s basement gimp, an impotent vassal which functions as little more than a United States military-intelligence asset in terms of meaningful international affairs.

So all I really am doing here is applying Mr. Chomskys philosophy to the reality of an empire in which sovereign nations do not exist to any meaningful extent; as a member of a state within that empire I focus on United States government malfeasance in the same way I would if I were living in Alaska or Hawaii.

All I am doing is pointing my personal skill set at what I see as the biggest problem in the world: a murderous empire in which I happen to reside and therefore bear special responsibility for opposing.

Which is simply the only sane stand for anyone to take, in my opinion.

"This Caitlin Johnstone article is available here"

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".