Donald Trumps Biggest Gamble Yet May Set the Entire Middle East Alight by Martin Jay!
(2020-01-05 at 17:12:05 )

Donald Trumps Biggest Gamble Yet May Set the Entire Middle East Alight by Martin Jay

The assassination of Irans top general is not only going to wreak havoc on United States of Americas allies in the region. It is also going to divide the Arab world just at the very time when diplomacy was working. Was that the real aim of the hit?

Much will be written in the coming days and weeks on how a war might take shape in the aftermath of President Trumps assassination of Qassem Soleimani, arguably Irans most cherished military figure who, for over twenty years, has run its regional conflicts and has shaped and maintained its strategic alliances in the entire Arab world.

Indeed, one could argue that Mr. Soleimani being killed is a huge blow to Tehran, as if we are to cast our minds back to the beginning of Donald Trumps inaugural stand with the Arab world, hosted by Saudi Arabia in May 2017. We should reflect on what irks the West, the Saudis and Israel the most: not so much Irans military capability from its own shores but its influence in the region, in particular Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.

In Syria, Iraq and Lebanon Mr. Soleimani played a critical role in running Hezbollah operations which tipped the balance of power in favour of Iran and its geopolitical partners in the region, chiefly Russia.

And so the strike, hardly an achievement of any military zeal, was inevitable in that Donald Trump was monitoring the Iranian general and was given a perfect moment - both to assassinate him and to justify the ends to the means.

Of course, so far we are still waiting to see the evidence that the Iranians were planning to hit United States soldiers in Iraq.

But we are left to ponder what the next moves will be by Iran, and then what the response will be by the United States and its allies.

It is unlikely that either side will willingly begin a full-blown war, in preference for hit-n-run tactics and the use of proxies.

But escalation and misjudgement on either side could start one.

The important point about the Mr. Soleimani strike is that Donald Trump has crossed a line of sanity and rational thinking.

He has convinced himself that he can start a war with Iran, if need be, and use it to win a United States election, in an almost carbon copy move, which he said on camera that Mr. Obama did (which in fact was not the case).

I personally do not think that the strike was a typically capricious move by Donald Trump.

I am more inclined to believe that it has been in the works for a long time and his advisers might well have offered it to him as a preferable retaliation option against the Iranian downing of a United States drone in June of last year - where Donald Trump floundered and finally held back from launching a conventional military attack on Iranian forces, through fear of civilians being killed, or so he claims.

What we are witnessing is unprecedented in the region.

It has caught everyone off guard, even the democrats in the United States, who can barely believe the stupidity of the move, which arguably, is a measured one.

Donald Trump believes that he can come out the winner of a pseudo war - or a proxy one - in the region, even though the Iranians have demonstrated that they easily have the capability of shutting down Saudi Arabias oil exports with a relatively minor salvo of ordinance.

In fact, Saudi Arabia might well, in my view, be part of this latest move.

Much has been made of the petulant twitter goading of Tehrans Supreme leader to Donald Trump directly, which may well have pushed him over a line.

But in reality, there is something much deeper and nefarious at play which may well be the true basis of why the decision was taken for the assassination: to destroy any possibilities of Iran and Saudi Arabia patching up their differences and continuing in dialogue, to avoid further tensions.

There is ample evidence to show that since the oilfield attacks carried out by Iran, Saudi crown prince Mohamed bin Salman has softened his stance on Iran and was looking at ways, through intermediaries, to build a working relation. It was early days and progress was slow.

But the Mr. Soleimani hit will blow that idea right out of the water.

In one fell swoop, the strike galvanises and polarises an anti-Iran front from Saudi Arabia and Israel, which, whilst doing wonders for United States arms procurement will cause more tension in the region as it places countries like Qatar, UAE, Turkey and Oman in a really awkward spot with regards to how it should continue to work with Tehran.

It may well put back the Qatar blockade to its earlier position as "rogue state" in the region, prompting it to possibly even go rogue and get more involved in the battle to take Tripoli (supporting Turkish forces, obviously, who are with the United Nations-recognised government).

In fact, there is an entire gamut of consequences to the move, beyond merely Iran seeking to take revenge against Americas allies in the region.

It is less about a declaration of war against Iran but more a declaration of anti-peace towards the entire Arab world, which was starting to unfold in the last six months since Donald Trump stepped back from the region and stood down from a retaliation strike against Iran in the Straits of Hormuz.

Donald Trump is gambling that he can sustain Saudi Arabias oil being disrupted and even body bags of United States soldiers in Syria and Iraq in return for a fresh wave of popularity from people too ignorant to understand or wish to comprehend the nuances of the Middle East and how so many United States presidents use the pretext of a war, or heightened tensions, as part of their chest-beating, shallow popularity campaign.

Do not expect any United States of American journalists to remind viewers that one of Mr. Soleimanis achievements was not only to command the entire Iraqi armys campaign against ISIS, but also to do that in cooperation with United States forces.

Donald Trump does not really read.

Or even take solace from history.

If he did, he would know that many United States presidents actually lost the vote at the crucial moment, because of their bungling in the Middle East and, in particular, in Iran.

President Reagan for example won the White House in November 1980 after the failed rescue mission of United States hostages in April of that year in Iran went spectacularly wrong which gave a "landslide" victory to the former B-movie actor from Hollywood.

Mr. Reagan, in turn, carried on the great tradition of Middle East histrionics by his notably "mad dog" Libya campaign, which ran concurrent to two devastating attacks on United States soldiers and embassy staff in Lebanon, while two different Central Intelligence Agency teams worked against each other in trying to secure the release of United States hostages in Beirut - while all along he was selling illegal arms to the Iranians and using the cash to fund Contras in Nicaragua.

Donald Trumps strike does ring of a president, struggling with an impeachment campaign gaining momentum, who may feel has nothing to lose other than to repeat history, which has doomed him, like Carter or Reagan (who never survived Iran-Contra).

But his reckless folly in the Middle East is also a test of how far relations with the United States and the rest of the world can go, before something breaks.

The assassination of the Iranian general could drive a huge divide between the United States and the EU in the next term, if Donald Trump can secure re-election as it will be Europe which pays the real price when the region boils over.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.