Atoms for Peace vs. Atoms for War: The Only Fix for Iran-United States Relations by Matthew Ehret!
(2020-01-12 at 08:24:50 )

Atoms for Peace vs. Atoms for War: The Only Fix for Iran-United States Relations by Matthew Ehret

War hawks in Israel and Washington,D.C. have been quick to denounce Irans nuclear power ambitions for years with the repeated excuse that "Iran has so much oil that nuclear energy is irrelevant for them- unless they wanted to build an Islamic Bomb!"

Hogwash.

As we shall come to see, not only has Irans Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei created a 2003 fatwa declaring nuclear weapons forbidden under Islamic Law, but Iranian leaders were already calling for the need to transition to a new and superior form of energy in order to escape the geopolitical constraints of oil politics over 70 years ago.. ironically through the help of the USA!

On December 8, 1953 a speech was delivered at the United Nations by President Dwight D. Eisenhower which has come to be known as his Atoms for Peace speech. As flawed as Mr. Eisenhower was as a political leader, this speech did provide a valuable gateway out of the unwinnable Cold War logic of Mutually Assured Destruction that had officially begun with the Soviet Unions first detonation of their own atomic bomb in 1949.

The United States had itself been reeling over an 8 year internal coup begun in 1945 over the Anglo-American deep state which had purged much of the United States intelligentzia of genuine patriots under the Federal Bureau of Investigation-run red scare and 1947 creation of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Using a talented hive of sociopaths under the direction of the Dulles Brothers, the Deep State had perverted United States foreign policy by launching the Korean War in 1950, and worked as Britains dumb giant in the overthrow Irans nationalist leader Mohammed Mossadegh in August 1953 when the later attempted to nationalize Britains Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 1951 (1).

Though a competent General, Eisenhower was admittedly naïve and only realized the full extent of what had gone on under his watch during his last days as President in 1961 as outlined in his Military Industrial Complex speech.

This part of history is vitally important to revive now, since Mr. Eisenhowers efforts to undo the terrible injustice caused by the United States of Americas complicity in the Iranian regime change as well as broader threat of nuclear annihilation remains the only functional pathway to a durable peace in Iran or globally today.

Unless President Trump breaks from neo-con pressure in ways that President Eisenhower failed to do throughout the 1950s, and returns to this spirit, the future looks bleak indeed.

Atoms for Peace and the Birth of Iranian Atomic Energy

In his 1953 speech, President Eisenhower laid out the threats and opportunities which the peaceful use of the atom created:

"The United States knows that if the fearful trend of atomic military build-up can be reversed, this greatest of destructive forces can be developed into a great boon, for the benefit of all mankind. The United States knows that peaceful power from atomic energy is no dream of the future. The capability, already proved, is here today. Who can doubt that, if the entire body of the worlds scientists and engineers had adequate amounts of fissionable material with which to test and develop their ideas, this capability would rapidly be transformed into universal, efficient and economic usage?"

The president listed several domains where the peaceful application of the atom would be of value to humanity saying:

"Experts would be mobilized to apply atomic energy to the needs of agriculture, medicine and other peaceful activities. A special purpose would be to provide abundant electrical energy in the power-starved areas of the world."

He ended by dropping the conceptual bombshell which shook the foundations of the newly emerging Deep State by calling for a joint United States-Russia alliance to cooperate on deploying this new technology around the world under a spirit of goodwill and mutually assured survival when he said this vision would "allow all peoples of all nations to see that, in this enlightened age, the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the armaments of war."

An earlier attempt to establish United States-Russia entente was made by Stalin who welcomed a meeting with the newly elected President in December 1952. Stalins death in March 1953 ended this potential.

Many of the worlds nations who have suffered the most under the hands of the "dumb giant" deep state United States of America in recent decades actually found a close ally in this better America. One might be surprised to discover that Atoms for Peace established the creation of atomic energy programs for Argentina, Brazil, India, Pakistan and Iran (to name but a few), through providing training to thousands of students internationally, as well as providing nuclear technology transfers, and financing (most of which ended in the wake of JFKs assassination).

In 1955 the first International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy took place in Geneva under the leadership of Dr. Homi Bhaba (father of Indian Atomic Energy), and in 1957 the USA and Iran signed the Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Atoms that set the foundation for the 1959 creation of the Tehran Nuclear Research Center.

Over the coming year, the first generation of Iranian nuclear scientists were trained in MIT and in 1967, the USA supplied Iran with a 5 megawatt research reactor and enriched uranium fuel. By 1969, the pace of nuclear development both within the United States of America and abroad had dropped drastically due in large measure to the deep state takeover of western governments and the imposition of a new logic of empire and post-industrial consumerism. This mis-anthropic agenda took the form of the 1970s CFR-Trilateral Commission-led "Controlled Disintegration of the Economy".

The Controlled Disintegration Agenda

An important recipe in this Controlled Disintegration agenda took the form of the 1973-74 oil shocks which saw oil prices skyrocket four-fold as tankers replete with oil were kept harbored off the coasts of the United States of America under direction of Henry Kissinger. This operation was laid out in full by historian William Engdahl in his 1992 Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order.

An unexpected effect was that the Shah of Iran announced that his nation would refocus its energy policies on aggressive nuclear power development, funded by its vast oil revenues. In 1974 the Shah created the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization (IAEO) saying "Petroleum is a noble material, much too valuable to burn.. we envision producing, as soon as possible 23 000 mW of electricity using nuclear plants."

In 1976, Irans nuclear energy budget was increased from $36 million to a whopping $1 billion and commitments to build 23 reactors were arranged with companies in Germany, France and the USA. Even President Ford, in a rare moment of sovereign thinking agreed to provide Iran with a reprocessing facility to complete the fuel cycle. Things were proceeding well as the two first 1190 mW reactors built by Germany were 80% and 50% completed when the Shah was suddenly overthrown by a regime change operation put into motion by none-other than the CFRs Zbigniew Brzinzski, Cyrus Vance and Henry Kissinger in 1979. Within weeks ALL contracts were cancelled and the two reactors remained unbuilt for decades. A parallel derailing of a pro-nuclear orientation occurred with the execution of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto who documented his fight with Mr. Kissinger over the latters denial of Pakistans right to access nuclear power (2).

Russia Revives Atoms for Peace

The anti-nuclear tides began to slowly turn in Irans favor in 1992 when China began supplying nuclear fuel to Iran and in 1995 Russia began to assist in the completion of the unfinished reactors. In 2011, the first 1000 mW reactor came online and a 2nd reactor was begun anew in 2019 under the guidance of Rosatom with several more planned for the coming decade.

While the United States of American neocons and their Zionist brethren have continued a policy of asymmetric war, cyber war, economic war, assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists (and now military officials), Russia has proven herself to be the true heir to the spirit of President Eisenhowers Atoms for Peace.

Rosatom has taken up the torch of nuclear energy diplomacy with gusto in recent years by providing valuable nuclear power assistance to both Iran and Turkey while aggressively building nuclear power reactors at home. The fact that these three nations are the guarantors of the Astana Peace Process for Syria should also not be missed.

Russia has also demonstrated an enlightened interest in assisting African nations in their nuclear ambitions with agreements signed with South Africa, Egypt, Zambia, Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, Sudan, Kenya, Ethiopia, Congo and Nigeria with scores of imperially-minded racists in London screaming of the "inappropriateness" of this advanced technology to the "dark continent".

Under the guiding win-win framework of Chinas Belt and Road Initiative, Iran and the world has been given a master key to permanently throw off the threat of nuclear annihilation.

Does President Trump have the moral and intellectual stamina to resist the neo-con pressure now and return the United States of America to its better traditions or will he permit himself to be used as a tool of the deep state by unleashing the nuclear dogs of war?

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.