Menu
Paynal © 2008
How the United States Regime and Its Allies Enforce Their Smears and Their Other Lies by Eric Zuesse!
(2020-01-27 at 15:12:42 )
How the United States Regime and Its Allies Enforce Their Smears and Their Other Lies by Eric Zuesse!
Without enforced suppression of truth, there would be no way that the United States and its allied regimes could continue hiding the lies that were behind their invasions of Iraq in 2003, and of Syria since 2012, and their coup against Ukraine in 2014, and also of their takeovers and attempted takeovers of other countries that had refused to be bullied by the United States regime into complying with its obsessive anti-Russian demands - Americas subterranean continuation of the Cold War, even after Russia had quit the Cold War in 1991.
All of the lies are still being propounded by the United States regime and remain fully enforced by suppression of the truth about these matters. That is being done in all news-media except a few of the non-mainstream ones.
So: this is about an actual Western samizdat - the Wests equivalent to the former Soviet Unions systematic, and equally pervasive, truth-suppression, to fool the public into thinking that the Government represents them, no matter how much it does not. (The chief trick in this regard is to fool them into thinking that since there is more than one political party, one of them will be "good," even though the fact may actually be that each of the parties represents simply a different faction of a psychopathically evil aristocracy.
After all: each party lied and supported invading Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, and Syria constantly; and no party acknowledges that the 2014 regime-change in Ukraine was a United States coup instead of a domestic Ukrainian democratic revolution.
On such important matters, they all lie, and in basically the same ways. These lies are bipartisan, even though most of the other political lies are heavily partisan.)
Right now, Julian Assange is rotting to death inside Britains equivalent to the United States regimes Guantanamo Bay prison, which is Belmarsh Prison, in London.
As the Central Intelligence Agency-edited and written Wikipedias article on Belmarsh Prison retrospectively admits, "Between 2001 and 2002, Belmarsh Prison was used to detain a number of people indefinitely without charge or trial under the provisions of the Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, leading it to be called the "British version of Guantanamo Bay"."
However, only because of the case of Julian Assange is it now publicly known that this characterization of that prison is - at least for him - equally true today.
And Mr. Assange is, indeed, being held there "indefinitely without charge or trial," even after his having previously been held in various other forms of confinement, ever since at least 12 April 2012, when - being then "temporarily" under house-arrest in Norfolk England, while awaiting trial on a manufactured rape-charge against him which was reluctantly abandoned by the Government only when the alleged victim refused to testify against him - Mr. Assange broadcast an interview for RT, Russian Television, an interview of the head of Lebanons Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah.
The United States-and-allied regimes billionaires-owned-and-controlled "news"-media condemned Mr. Assange for this interview, because it enabled whomever still had an open mind, amongst the Western public, to hear from one of those billionares destruction-targets (Nasrallah), and for Mr. Assanges doing this on the TV-news network of the main country that the United States of Americas billionaires are especially trying to conquer, which is (and since 26 July 1945 has consistently been) Russia.
The great then-independent investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald headlined about that interview, at Salon on 18 April 2012, "Attacks on RT and Mr. Assange reveal much about the critics: Those who pretend to engage in adversarial journalism will invariably hate those who actually do it." How true that was, and unfortunately still is! And Mr. Assange himself is the best example of it. Mr. Greenwald wrote:
Let us examine the unstated premises at work here.
There is apparently a rule that says it is perfectly OK for a journalist to work for a media outlet owned and controlled by a weapons manufacturer (GE-NBC-MSNBC), or by the United States and British governments (BBC-Stars & Stripes-Voice of America), or by Rupert Murdoch and Saudi Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal (Wall St. Journal-Fox News), or by a banking corporation with long-standing ties to right-wing governments (Politico), or by for-profit corporations whose profits depend upon staying in the good graces of the United States government (Kaplan-The Washington Post), or by loyalists to one of the two major political parties (National Review-TPM-countless others), but it is an intrinsic violation of journalistic integrity to work for a media outlet owned by the Russian government.
Where did that rule come from?
But from "temporary" house-arrest there, Mr. Assange was allowed asylum by Ecuadors progressive President Rafael Correa on 20 June 2012, to stay in Londons Ecuadoran Embassy, so as not to be seized by the United Kingdom regime to be sent to prison and probable death-without-trial in the United States To Mr. Correas shock, it turned out that Mr. Correas successor, Vice President Lenin Moreno, was actually a United States agent, who promptly forced Mr. Assange out of the Embassy, into Belmarsh prison, to die there or else become extradited to die in a United States prison, also without trial.
And, for what, then, is Mr. Assange being imprisoned, and perhaps murdered?
He divulged government secrets that should never even have been secrets! He raised the blanket of lies, which covers over these actually dictatorial clandestine international operations. He exposed these evil imperialistic operations, which are hidden behind (and under) that blanket of imperialists lies. For this, he is being martyred - a martyr for democracy, where there is no actual democracy (but only those lies).
Here is an example:
On December 29th, I headlined "Further Proof: United States, United Kingdom, & France Committed War-Crime on 14 April 2018" and reported highlights of the latest Wikileaks document-dumps regarding a United States-United Kingdom-French operation to cover-up (via their control over the OPCW) their having committed an international war-crime when they had fired 105 missiles against Syria on 14 April 2018, which was done allegedly to punish Syria for having perpetrated a gas-attack in Douma seven days before — except that there had not been any such gas-attack, but the OPCW simply lied and said that there might have been one, and that the Syrian Government might have done it!
That is playing the publoc for suckers.
Back on 3 November 2019, Fox News bannered "Fox News Poll: Bipartisan majorities want some United States troops to stay in Syria" and reported that when citing ISIS as Americas enemy that must be defeated, 69% of United States respondents wanted United States troops to stay in Syria.
But when did ISIS ever constitute a threat to United States national security?
And under what international law is any United States soldier, who is inside Syria, anything other than an invader there?
The answer, to both of these questions, is obviously "never" and "none."
But if you are an investor in Lockheed Martin, do not you want United States of Americans to be suckers about both?
And, so, they are.
People such as Julian Assange do not want the public anywhere to be lied-to. Anyone who is in the propaganda-business - serving companies such as Lockheed Martin - wants the public to be suckers.
This is the way the free market actually works.
It works by lying, and in such a country the Government serves the people who have the money, and not the people who do not.
The people who do not have the money are supposed to be lied-to.
And, so, they are.
But this is not democracy.
Democracy, in fact, is impossible if the public are predominantly deceived. If the public are predominantly deceived, then the people who do the deceiving will be the dictators there.
And if a country has dictators, then it is no democracy.
In a totally free market, only the people with the most money will have any freedom at all; everyone else will be merely their suckers, who are fooled by the professionals at doing that - lying.
The super-rich enforce their smears, and their other lies, by hiring people to do this.
When Barack Obama said that "The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation" - so that each other nation is "dispensable" - he was merely exemplifying the view that only the most powerful is indispensable, and that therefore everyone else is dispensable.
Of course, this is the way that he, and Donald Trump, both have governed in the United States And Americans overwhelmingly endorse this viewpoint.
They are fooled by both parties, because both parties serve only their respective billionaires - and billionaires are above the law; they are the law, in the United States of America and its allied regimes.
That is the way it is.
This is the United States of American gospel, and it is called "capitalism."
Oddly, after Russia switched to capitalism in 1991, the United States of American gospel switched instead to pure global conquest - über-imperialism - and the American public did not even blink.
So: nowadays, capitalism has come to mean über-imperialism. That is todays United States American gospel. Adolf Hitler would be smiling, upon todays United States of Amerika.
And as far as whistleblowers - such as Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning, and other champions of honesty and of democracy - are concerned: United States of Americans agree with the billionaires, who detest and destroy such whistleblowers.
Champions of democracy are shunned here, where Public Relations reigns and real journalism is almost non-existent.
Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.