How Obamas Mid-East Policy Led to Nazi Rebirth in Todays Germany by Eric Zuesse!
(2020-01-30 at 15:13:50 )

How Obamas Mid-East Policy Led to Nazi Rebirth in Todays Germany by Eric Zuesse!

On January 12th, Deutsche Welle (Germanys public broadcaster like BBC, PBS, NPR, and RT) headlined "Mayors resignation highlights threat to German leaders: Arnd Focke, the Social Democratic mayor of a town in Lower Saxony, was regularly threatened by nationalists. Now he has resigned. Regional officials have repeatedly faced threats across Germany." He quit for his safety, because carrying out Germanys compassionate policies toward the flood of mainly Middle-Eastern refugees has produced a backlash that is becoming increasingly organized and dangerous to Germanys democracy.

United States President Barack Obamas policies in support of overthrowing secular governments (such as in Libya and Syria) in the Middle East, and his attempts to install there new governments - which were planned to be allied with the fundamentalist-Sunni Saud family who own Saudi Arabia - caused the exodus, from those secularly-headed United States-attacked Middle-Eastern countries, of millions, some of whom live now in Germany and are not accepted there, for many of reasons, some valid and some invalid.

The resulting influx of millions of culturally markedly different people has given rise to a rebirth of Germanys Nazi movement.

Whereas Barack Obamas United States, and especially now Donald Trumps United States, has refused entry of refugees from these countries that the United States of America (by means of its tens of thousands of jihadist proxy-forces from around the world) invaded, Europe (and especially Germany) has been compassionate toward the refugees, and are now experiencing the political blowback, at home, from their admission of refugees from the United States of Americas foreign policy - a policy favoring dictatorial fundamentalist-Sunni Arab regimes, to overthrow secular governments in the Middle East.

How and why did this happen?

Muammar Gaddafi was a socialist who believed in spreading to the masses (instead of to foreign investors) the wealth from the nations oil and who consequently was rejected by the United States-and-allied aristocracies who control the private oil companies.

Mr. Gaddafi was demonized by their governments and their media. After extensive planning by the Central Intelligence Agency and associated coup-organizations, he was finally overthrown in an "Arab Spring" in 2011 and replaced by what they expected to be a re-privatization of Libyas oil.

Ms Hillary Clinton proudly proclaimed, "We came, we saw, he died! Ha, ha, hah!” Europe gets the refugees.

Bashar al-Assad was similar, in those basics. During 2012, Barack Obama was well-warned by United States intelligence - and even by the anti-Assad "rebels" themselves - that if he tried to overthrow Mr. Assad, then the United States would need to be using proxy-fighters to do it, jihadists, under the direction of Al Qaedas Syrian branch al-Nusra, and he chose that option and left to the Saud family to choose whom to rule Syria in the aftermath.

Consequently, the Saud family selected the individuals who were to "represent the rebels" at the United Nations-sponsored "peace"-talks to end the Syrian "civil" war. It was all a set-up deal, by Barack Obama and his foreign allies.

Even the pro-Obama New York Times reported on 27 April 2013 that "Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of."

But still Barack Obama insisted that "Assad must go." (Though that was a common headline on news-reports about Barack Obamas position, he was too slick ever to utter that phrase: in his rhetoric he was the exact opposite of his successor, who continued Barack Obamas Syria-policy.)

Conquering Syria for the Sauds to control was the aim. Europe has received the refugees from that United States decision, not only from the other ones, on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere.

By Europes siding with the United States, it has opted to side with the Sauds, and with jihadists, and, now, also with Nazis, and other racist-fascists.

Now that Donald Trump has gone so far as to terminate Barack Obamas only good foreign-policy action, the JCPOA or Iran nuclear agreement, and to opt for war against Iran, the dangers to democracy in Europe could escalate even farther.

But for some people, the rebirth of Nazism in Germany might be enough of a reason for Europe to reverse its foreign policies in fundamental ways.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.