Stumbling into Catastrophe by Daniel McAdams!
(2020-02-02 at 12:14:47 )

Stumbling into Catastrophe by Daniel McAdams!

There is a real danger for foreign policy advisors and analysts - and especially those they serve - when they are in a bubble, an echo chamber, and all of their conclusions are based on faulty inputs.

Needless to say it is even worse when they believe they can create their own reality and invent outcomes out of whole cloth.

Things seldom go as planned in these circumstances.

President Donald Trump was sold a bill of goods on the assassination of Irans revered military leader, General Qassim Soleimani, likely by a cabal around Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the long-discredited neocon David Wurmser.

A former Netanyahu advisor and Iraq war propagandist, Mr. Wurmser reportedly sent memos to his mentor, John Bolton, while Mr. Bolton was Donald Trumps National Security Advisor (now, of course, he is the hero of the #resistance for having turned on his former boss) promising that killing General Soleimani would be a cost-free operation that would catalyze the Iranian people against their government and bring about the long-awaited regime change in that country.

The murder of General Soleimani - the architect of the defeat of ISIS - would "rattle the delicate internal balance of forces and the control over them upon which the [Iranian] regime depends for stability and survival," wrote Mr. Wurmser.

As is most often the case with neocons, he was dead wrong.

The operation was not cost-free.

On the contrary.

Assassinating General Soleimani on Iraqi soil resulted in the Iraqi parliament - itself the product of our "bringing democracy" to the country - voting to expel United States forces even as the vote by the peoples representatives was roundly rejected by the people who brought the people the peoples representatives. In a manner of speaking.

President Trumps move had an effect opposite to the one promised by neocons.

It did not bring Iranians out to the street to overthrow their government - it catalyzed opposition across Iraqs various political and religious factions to the continued United States military presence and further tightened Iraqs relationship with Iran.

And short of what would be a catastrophic war initiated by the United States (with little or no support from allies), there is not a thing Donald Trump can do about it.

Irans retaliatory attack on two United States bases in Iraq was initially sold by President Trump as merely a pin-prick.

No harm, no foul, no injuries.

This despite the fact that he must have known about United States personnel injured in the attack.

The reason for the lie was that Donald Trump likely understands how devastating it would be to his presidency to escalate with Iran.

So the truth began to trickle out slowly - 11 United States military members were injured, but it was just "like a headache."

Now we know that 50 United States troops were treated for traumatic brain injury after the attack. This may not be the last of it - but do not count on the mainstream media to do any reporting.

The Iranian FARS news agency reported at the time of the attack that United States personnel had been injured and the response by the United States government was to completely take that media outlet off the Internet by order of the United States Treasury!

Today the United States House voted to cancel the 2002 authorization for war on Iraq and to prohibit the use of funds for war on Iran without Congressional authorization.

It is a significant, if largely symbolic, move to rein in the oft-used excuse of the Iraq war authorization for blatantly unrelated actions like the assassination of General Soleimani and President Obamas thousands of airstrikes on Syria and Iraq.

President Trump has argued that prohibiting funds for military action against Iran actually makes war more likely, as he would be restricted from the kinds of military-strikes-short-of-war like his attack on Syria after the alleged chemical attack in Douma in 2018 (claims which have recently fallen apart).

The logic is faulty and reflects again the danger of believing ones own propaganda.

As we have seen from the Iranian military response to the General Soleimani assassination, Donald Trumps military-strikes-short-of-war are having a ratchet-like effect rather than a pressure-release or deterrent effect.

As the financial and current events analysis site ZeroHedge put it recently:

Since last summers "tanker wars", Donald Trump has painted himself into a corner on Iran, jumping from escalation to escalation (to this latest "point of no return big one" in the form of the ordered General Soleimani assassination) - yet all the while hoping to avoid a major direct war.

The situation reached a climax where there were "no outs" ( President Trump was left with two "bad options" of either back down or go to war).

The Iranians have little to lose at this point and Americas European allies are, even if impotent, fed up with the United States obsession with Saudi Arabia and Israel as a basis for its Middle East policy.

So why open this essay with a photo of Trump celebrating his dead-on-arrival "Deal of The Century" for Israel and Palestine?

Because this is once again a gullible and weak President Trump being led by the nose into the coming Middle East conflagration.

Left without even a semblance of United States sympathy for their plight, the Palestinians after the roll-out of this "peace" plan will again see that they have no friends outside Syria, Iran, and Lebanon.

As Israel continues to flirt with the idea of simply annexing large parts of the West Bank, it is clear that the brakes are off of any Israeli reticence to push for maximum control over Palestinian territory. So what is there to lose?

President Trump believes he is advancing peace in the Middle East, while the excellent Mondoweiss website rightly observes that a main architect of the "peace plan," Donald Trumps own son-in-law Jared Kushner, "taunts Palestinians because he wants them to reject his -peace plan.-"

Rejection of the plan is a green light to a war of annihilation on the Palestinians.

It appears that the center may not hold, that the self-referential echo chamber that passes for Beltway "expert" analysis will again be caught off guard in the consequence-free profession that is neocon foreign policy analysis.

"Gosh we did not see that coming!" But the next day they are back on the teevee stations as great experts.

Clouds gathering...

Copyright 2020 by "Ron Paul Institue". Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.