Why Post-Coronavirus United States of America Will Have Massive Poverty by Eric Zuesse!
(2020-04-23 at 23:52:37 )

Why Post-Coronavirus United States of America Will Have Massive Poverty by Eric Zuesse!

The way that Congress and the President structured the United States of Americas coronavirus bailout legislation, the protections that go to the super-wealthy start immediately, but the protections that go to the neediest - the soaring numbers of unemployed, the increasingly endangered medical workers, etc. - require documentation which is creating delays that might soon cause many of these individuals to lose their homes, their cars, even their lives.

On April 17th, Matt Taibbi headlined "The Trickle-Up Bailout" and he noted that:

As we head into the second month of pandemic lockdown, two parallel narratives are developing about the financial rescue.

In one, ordinary people receive aid through programs that are piecemeal, complex, and riddled with conditions.

A law freezing evictions applies to holders of government-backed mortgages only. "Disaster grants" are coming more slowly and in smaller amounts than expected; small businesses were disappointed to learn from the SBA early last week that aid would be limited to $1000 per employee.

That is typical.

As I had already explained on April 14th:

The United States of Americas bailout package to overcome the coronavirus "recession" is twofold:

One part is printing money for employees and consumers, so that they will not be thrown out onto the streets for non-payment of debts such as mortgages, car-loans, credit cards, and student loans.

Another part is printing money for bondholders and stockholders, so that their investments will still have value and there will not be panicked selling of them as corporations accumulate soaring losses because consumers are staying home and are cutting way back on expenses.

The top-down part of the bailout (the part for investors) will merely add to the wealth of the already-wealthy, while everybody else sinks financially into oblivion. (On April 9th, the Zero Hedge financial site explained in detail why even bailing out the airlines would hurt the economy more than help the economy.) The top-down part supplies the money to the corporations instead of to their employees and consumers, and is therefore supply-boosting instead of demand-boosting. Supplying money to the corporations that the Government selects to protect will enable those corporations to buy up assets and corporations which during the crisis are being auctioned off by the ones that go out of business, and this will leave the nations wealth in even fewer hands than before the epidemic struck.

The bottom-up part (the part for workers and consumers) will be exactly the opposite of that: it will help prevent another Great Depression. By boosting purchases, instead of bailing-out billionaires and such, it will enable the economy to keep functioning, and it will not increase the concentration of wealth.

However, employees and consumers do n0t have many lobbyists, but billionaires do, and billionaires also own (through political donations and lobbyists) almost all members of Congress (and also the mainstream press), and they not only own, but are represented by, one inside the White House, who is surrounded there by others, and by representatives of others, so that the concerns of the wealthiest will be very well represented by Americas Government, and will end up dominating the bailouts, so that only the insiders, who are well-connected in Washington,D.C., will be protected. (And Joe Biden would be no improvement over Donald Trump, though his rhetoric is different.)

Already, we see, in the "news"-reports, that there is "chaos" etc. in the United States Governments response to the crisis, but what is not being reported in the mainstream "news"-media is that there very much is method to this seeming madness, and it is the method of the well-practiced and well-funded takers, definitely not of their victims, from whom they (and their Government) have been, and now increasingly are, taking.

The takers own the Deep State, and are protected by it. The vast bulk of the bailouts will go to them. The vast bulk of the bailouts will go to suppliers (investors), not to their workers and consumers.

So, as a general rule: the more that a persons income depends upon investments, and the less that it depends upon their labor (wages), the more fully that the bailouts will compensate for the losses they will be suffering as a result of the coronavirus disruptions.

Here is a breakdown of the incomes that the super-rich receive (mainly from investments), versus the incomes that everybody else receive:

As can easily be seen there, only the super-rich (the top 1%, and most especially the top 0.1%) receive the majority of their incomes from investments ("Business income" and "Capital income"). Everybody else receives it mainly from "compensation" (wages), "retirement income," and "Transfer income" (welfare).

Most of the benefits to the top 0.1% will be coming by means of monetary policy, via the Federal Reserve, not by means of fiscal policy - such as the payments to the unemployed (which are subject to many delays) and such as the $1,200-per-adult grants (which were the fastest to be paid because it is the "helicopter money" that buys votes for the political incumbents, all of whom had voted for the bailouts).

The bailouts widely publicized part is the $2.2 trillion, since that includes whatever the public gets. However, that part is the smaller portion of the entire program. As CBS News reported on March 24th, "Top White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said the price tag of economic stimulus amounts to roughly $6 trillion, which includes $2 trillion for direct assistance, and roughly $4 trillion in Federal Reserve lending power. Mr. Kudlow said this will be the single-largest such Main Street financial package in the history of the country." Kudlow said it at a White House press conference. He mentioned there just in passing (at 1:36), that it is a "six trillion-dollar program, four trillion dollars in lending power from the Fed, that is a six trillion-dollar package .." and the reporters in the White House press corps did not ask him anything about the Feds part, the $4 trillion portion (the programs part that protects the billionaires); they evidently did not care about that, but only about the $2.2 trillion, which is actually the PR decoration on this $6T cake - the $2.2T that the public is interested in, the bait-part of the entire bailout-program. (Its hook will not sink in until the readers children and grandchildren will be paying for it via their taxes in a stripped America.) However, on March 26th, Wall Street on Parade (WSP) - the best investigative-reporting source about Wall Street - headlined "Stimulus Bill Allows Federal Reserve to Conduct Meetings in Secret; Gives Fed $454 Billion Slush Fund for Wall Street Bailouts" and disclosed that even what Mr. Kudlow had called "Main Street" (the $2.2T part) included much for Wall Street; and WSP then rhetorically asked, "Why does the Federal Reserve need $454 billion from the United States taxpayer to bail out Wall Street when it has the power to create money out of thin air and has already dumped more than $9 trillion cumulatively in revolving loans to prop up Wall Streets trading houses since September 17, 2019 - long before there was any diagnosis of coronavirus anywhere in the world?"

They promptly answered this: "The Fed needs that money to create more Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) - the same device used by Enron to hide its toxic debt off its balance sheet before it went belly up." Furthermore, the $454 billion, which WSP called "the money the Treasury is handing over to the Fed" is what CBS had reported "would result in -$4 trillion in Federal Reserve lending power-."

And United States taxpayers are guaranteeing 100% of these loans to investors - so, it is "heads you win, tails we lose," for taxpayers addressing billionaires, and "heads we win, tails you lose," for billionaires addressing taxpayers. The billionaires win, the public loses. But the billionaires media do not mention this fact, that investors get the guarantees, while the public takes all of the risks. However, what is an "investment" for, if non-investors are receiving its risks?

It is just legalized crime. And these are huge risks, and all or most of the $454 billion that the United States is lending to the Fed to guarantee private investors investments could be destroyed in the coronavirus-crisis.

This is far more socialism for the super-rich than for the bottom 99%. The billionaires love socialism when they are the ones who are getting the bailouts - the public taking on the risks that investors are supposed to assume. The issue for billionaires is not "socialism versus capitalism," like they always say; it is actually "socialism for us, and capitalism for everybody else."

That is not "survival of the fittest," for the wealthiest class; it is instead their ordering their politicians to: protect our wealth, no matter what the cost to the public could turn out to be. And that is precisely what the President and Congress did. Mr. Kudlow, however, said, instead, that the "package" would produce "a good rebound in the second half of the year." Maybe for the billionaires it would.

Mr. Kudlow was simply being consistent with his own prior record. On 10 December 2007, he had headlined in National Review, "Bush Boom Continues: You can call it Goldilocks 2.0. But you can not call it a recession." And he closed by saying, "This sort of fiscal and monetary coordination will continue the Bush boom for years to come." He is good for the billionaires; and, so, today, he is President Donald Trumps top economic advisor. He is up there, because he is wrong - not because he is right. (If he had been right, he would not be there.)

After the immediate crisis is over, the United States of America will have a top 0.1% who are unscathed and whose mega-corporations will be selling not only what they had been selling before, but selling virtually everything that sells in the post-coronavirus world. For examples: what mom-and-pop businesses (including restaurants, B&Bs, etc.) had previously been selling, will, in the future, be supplied (to the extent that it remains being supplied at all) by McDonalds, Starbucks, Marriott, Amazon, Target, Walmart, and other megacorporations (controlled by billionaires), which will have been receiving, from the Fed, and from the Treasury, whatever they needed in order to carry their investors through the crisis-period. (And who are those investors? Look at that chart above, the recipients mainly of "Business income" and "Capital income" - the chief recipients of dividends, interest, and capital gains incomes.)

Furthermore: after the crisis, commercial real estate will be super-cheap, because of all the bankrupted mom-and-pop businesses. Wages also will decline, as the public become increasingly desperate, and the billionaires win increasing market-power. Therefore, not only will the megacorporations be selling a larger percentage of the national output, but their expenses will go down.

Consequently: theUnited States of America will have lots more poor people, and lots wealthier billionaires.

This, however, will be only a temporary situation, because the enormous spread of poverty will result in greatly decreased taxes coming into all levels of the United States Government.

Bridges will collapse, potholes will proliferate, unendowed colleges will close, nervous breakdowns and heart-attacks will increase, and thus the public will not be able to spend as much as they were spending before the crisis hit. And, so, although the megacorporations will be selling a larger percentage of national output, that national output will decline, because of the spreading poverty. Therefore, even the billionaires will not necessarily become richer than they were before the crisis hit.

All of this outcome is unnecessary and results from corruption. The only reason why there is any bailout, at all, for investors (in anything other than pass-through entities), is the pervasive governmental corruption at the very top.

If there were no corruption, then the only bailouts would be to individuals and pass-through businesses (which are individuals) - the "bottom-up" bailouts. The United States of America is a very corrupt country at the top, and that is the reason why it will collapse in the aftermath of the coronavirus crisis.

Ultimately, when the wealth-inequality is so extreme, the billionaires are selling mainly to each other, and the necessities for the public are less and less profitable to sell at all. The outcome will therefore be economic collapse, and perhaps even revolution.

The basic way to evaluate how well or poorly a nations Government is performing in this crisis is the countrys ratio of coronavirus cases to its total population, but if a given country has not yet reached its peak in its daily number of new cases, then that countrys ratio is probably still rising, in which instance, that countrys performance will probably turn out to have been less good than this ratio currently is showing it to be. And, conversely, the lower this ratio is, the better the performance of that countrys Government is shown to be in responding to Covid-19.

Here are the ten nations that have the largest numbers of cases at the present time, and the ratio of that number to their total population; and also shown here is the date when the daily number of new cases peaked (because if it has not yet peaked, then this crucial ratio will probably be rising in that country):

Ratio of total cases divided by total population (the lower this number, the better):

USA - 740,928/330,000,000 = 0.00224523636 not yet peaked

SPAIN - 195,944/46,940,000 = 0.00417435023 peaked March 26th

ITALY - 178,972/60,360,000 = 0.0029650762 peaked March 19th

FRANCE - 152,578/66,990,000 = 0.00227762352 peaked April 3rd

GERMANY - 144,387/83,020,000 = 0.00173918332 peaked March 27th

UK - 120,067/66,650,000 = 0.00180145536 peaked April 10th

TURKEY - 86,306/82,000,000 = 0.00105251219 peaked April 11th

CHINA - 82,735/1,393,000,000 = 0.00005939339 peaked February 12th

IRAN - 82,211/81,800,000 = 0.00100502444 peaked March 30th

RUSSIA - 42,853/144,500,000 = 0.00029656055 not yet peaked

In addition, the following major countries might especially be noted, since the main reason they are not on that list is their being outstandingly good performers:

JAPAN - 10,797/126,500,000 = 0.00008535177 peaked April 11th

S. KOREA - 10,661/51,640,000 = 0.00020644848 peaked March 3rd

The worst of all these performers appear currently to be, though not yet in any clear order: USA, Spain, and Italy.

The best appear to be, in order: China, Japan, and S. Korea.

The United States press has recently been particularly praising Denmarks performance, and noting that Denmarks coronavirus emergency legislation is more socialistic than Swedens is. However, both of those Scandinavian countries actually have very similar actual performance, thus far, in this crisis. In Denmark, the focus of the emergency legislation was on "saving jobs," instead of on protecting investors. It is a democratic socialist country, perhaps the most equalitarian in the world. Of course, that is the exact opposite of dictatorial capitalism (fascism), which became the United States of Americas system after FDR died in 1945, and increasingly thereafter (hyper-imperialistic, military-industrial-complex or "MIC" dominated, like fascist regimes usually are), perpetrating coups and invasions, destroying Iran, Iraq, and many other countries, in order to expand its power and the wealth of its billionaires (like the fascist countries had done going into WW II).

No cases of coronavirus-19 were reported in Denmark until February 27th. Denmark unanimously passed its emergency law on March 13th - drastically different bailout legislation from the one that the United States of America subsequently passed - in order to deal with the crisis.

The daily number of Denmarks new Covid-19 cases peaked on April 7th, and has been declining since that time. Its neighbor Sweden peaked on April 8th. Swedens emergency legislation is less strict about lockdowns, but relies more on individual discretion. However, since Sweden, like Denmark, is a democratic socialist country, individuals need not worry about paying medical bills, nor about being paid while on sick-leave. So, employees are not desperate to return to their places of work, such as in the United States of America; and, therefore, these countries do not spread the infection as readily as in the United States and are thus far less likely to have recurring peaks and delayed terminations of the coronavirus crisis.

(By contrast; in the United States of America, where losing ones job can mean losing ones health care, even sick employees may be inclined to stay on the job and perhaps infect customers.) And there are no corporate bailouts in either Denmarks or Swedens legislation. Denmarks Finance Minister, the Social Democrat (or democratic socialist) Nicolai Wammen was interviewed for 15 minutes on March 27th, by Christiane Amanpour, and he explained Denmarks emergency law, which was overwhelmingly bottom-up, not top-down (such as Americas is).

Here, therefore, is the actual performance, thus far, of both of those two countries:

DENMARK - 7,384/5,806,000 = 0.00127178780 peaked April 7th

SWEDEN - 14,385/10,230,000 = 0.00140615835 peaked April 8th

Both of them are reasonably comparable to Germany, UK, Turkey, and Iran, but not as good as S. Korea, and not nearly as good as the two best, China and Japan.

In the final analysis, China and Japan could turn out to have the least-corrupt and best-run Governments; and the most corrupt Governments could turn out to be USA, Spain, and Italy. However, the performances of Brazil and some other nations in the southern hemisphere might yet turn out to be even worse than those of USA, Spain, and Italy, because the winter season has not yet reached there.

On April 16th, Wall Street on Parade headlined "Here Are the Contracts Showing How $4.5 Trillion in Stimulus Was Outsourced to Wall Street" and described - and documented - what the Wall Street Journal and the rest of the financial press would not, which is the United States Governments legalized money-laundering operation, via the Fed, transferring onto the United States of American public almost all of the losses that Americas billionaires will be suffering from the coronavirus crash. Back on 21 January 2020, WSP described this money-laundering, in its earlier 2008 embodiment, this way: "The epic financial collapse on Wall Street in 2008 was, reduced to its basic terms, simply the end game of Wall Street banks efforts to monetize their frauds." They noted: "On April 9, 2019, the nonprofit Wall Street watchdog, Better Markets, released a study titled: "Wall Streets Six Biggest Bailed-Out Banks: Their RAP Sheets & Their Ongoing Crime Spree."

It should have made headlines on the front pages of every major newspaper in the United States Instead, it was effectively ignored by mainstream media." (Incidentally: Barack Obama repeatedly promised to prosecute banksters, but secretly protected them and prosecuted none of them, though their crimes had been monstrous. The billionaires thefts from the public are entirely bipartisan, supported by over 95% of Congress - the billionaires own the Presidents and members of Congress, and not only own virtually all of the news-media.)

On April 20th, Americas National Public Radio (NPR) broadcast "Amid Pandemic, Italian Prosecutors Warn That Mafia Groups Are Cementing Their Power" and reported that Mafia bosses were buying up cheap some of Italys suddenly desperate small businesses. If the same thing is being done by Americas billionaires, that is not yet being reported by their press - perhaps it will instead be reported by Italys press.

The Federal Reserve are controlled by and represent the banksters - Wall Street - who not only skim on their own accounts but work with and for the billionaires, some of whom are themselves banksters, but many of whom are operating hedge funds, private equity funds, and all types of FORTUNE 500 companies. Basically, Wall Street works for the billionaires. The billionaires run practically everything in the United States of America, except Main Street.

In the upcoming June 2020 issue of the neoconservative (pro-United States-imperialist) Democratic Party United States magazine, The Atlantic, their George Packer banners "We Are Living in a Failed State: The coronavirus did not break America. It revealed what was already broken." That magazine blames this "failed state" on the (neoconservative) Republican Party, and so Packers phrase there "a dysfunctional government" links to an anti-Republican article, by one of the top officials in the liberal neoconserative United States Administration of the Democrat Barack Obama, titled "How Trump Designed His White House to Fail." However, the actual cause of the gradual collapse, since 1945, of what had been United States President FDRs largely democratic U.S.A., is the billionaires who own both Parties - it is bipartisan. This rot comes from both Parties billionaires.

(The particular propaganda-operation, The Atlantic, happens to be controlled by the same Democratic Party billionaire who controls Apple corporation.) No billionaire will publish the reality. For example, Packers article said: "The second crisis, in 2008, intensified it [-a bitterness toward the political class-]. At the top, the financial crash could almost be considered a success. Congress passed a bipartisan bailout bill that saved the financial system." The presumption there is that the only way to restore the economy after a crash is to bail out the countrys billionaires. It is a timely message, at this moment when the billionaires require their Government to bail them out, yet again. (I recently proposed one way to reduce the billionaires dictatorship over America.)

On April 17th, WSP headlined "Americans Are Paying a Tragic Price for Allowing Five Banks to Control the United States Economy" and closed by urging: "Americans need to use this time at home to call their Senators and Reps in Congress and demand the separation of federally-insured, deposit-taking banks from the casinos on Wall Street.

We are talking about nothing less than the survival of this country." Needless to say, the ultimate beneficiaries of this public largesse - to Americas billionaires - do not desire to publicize such writings, any more than they desire to publicize to the public their offshore bank accounts.

Unlike so much that is in the billionaires "news", the facts that are reported here are solidly documented (and linked-to), but the billionaires do not report these facts. Thus, the masses do not know these facts, and so the mass-violence, when it comes, will not be focused against the billionaires. What you are reading, here, is being kept secret by (not being published by) the billionaires media. So - if only to spread word that the cause of this is not "the Chinese" or "foreigners" or "the Jews" or some other amorphous ethnicity, who are not actually to blame - please email the URL (the web-address) atop this article, to all of your friends, as "FYI:".

It might stir some interesting conversations, especially if all the ‘news that they know comes from Americas billionaires - the same people who fund the countrys successful politicians, each and every election-year.

The American Revolution did not come about by misinformed people. It came about by infomed people. Misinformed people create only more problems.

So, that is "FYI." And thanks for reading here.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.