The Way Liberals Smear Tara Reade Is Everything Rape Survivors Fear by Caitlin Johnstone!
(2020-04-29 at 21:40:47 )

The Way Liberals Smear Tara Reade Is Everything Rape Survivors Fear by Caitlin Johnstone!

Former Georgia state congresswoman and gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who is on the Joe Biden running mate short list and making no secret of her desire for the job, said on CNN Tuesday night that she did not believe rape allegations against Mr. Biden to be credible.

"The New York Times did a deep investigation and they found that the accusation was not credible. I believe Joe Biden," Ms Abrams said when pressed on further corroborating evidence that Mr. Bidens accuser Tara Reade had been talking about a sexual assault by the then-senator way back in the nineties.

CNNs Don Lemon pressed Ms Abrams on the contradiction between her earlier "believe women" rhetoric about conservative Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaughs accuser, to which Ms Abrams responded that Mr. Kavanaughs accuser was not given a fair hearing but Tara Reade was. Past tense. Over and done with now.

Mr. Lemon did not ask why Ms Abrams considers The New York Times the official arbiter of who was and was not raped. He did not challenge her false assertion that The New York Times concluded Ms Reades accusation was "not credible". He did not point out that the investigation by the The New York Times took place prior to the emergence of the corroborating evidence in question. Ms Abrams was allowed to coolly insert a false, baseless narrative into public consciousness and move on.

In reality, The New York Times is not the authority on who has and has not been sexually assaulted. That is not a thing.

In reality, The New York Times did not conclude that Ms Reades accusation is not credible, only that they "found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable" (which they later quietly edited down to "found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden" at the instruction of the Joe Biden campaign, a very blatant act of journalistic malpractice).

In reality, The New York Times has smeared Ms Reade with a scandalous hit piece dismissing her allegations because she has written approvingly of Russian president Vladimir Putin, implying that either (A) Reade is a Russian agent fabricating the allegations to help Donald Trump, or (B) that it is okay to rape women if they disagree with beltway consensus foreign policy.

In reality, two new corroborating pieces of evidence have been added to the growing pile since The New York Times published its "investigation" into Ms Reades allegations: footage of Ms Reades mother anonymously calling in to Larry King Live in 1993 during Ms Reades last month of employment with Joe Biden saying that her daughter was considering going to the press with a very serious allegation against a very prominent senator, and a former neighbor saying that Ms Reade had told her about the sexual assault in the mid-nineties.

At this point you have basically got two choices of what to believe: either (A) Tara Reade was going around lying to her closest confidants in the 1990s with the very long-term goal of one day thwarting Joe Bidens third presidential bid decades later, or (B) a powerful man sexually assaulted a woman. One of these, in my opinion, is a lot more probable than the other.

I have been avoiding writing much about Tara Reade, for a lot of reasons. Firstly I am a survivor of multiple rapes and it brings up a lot of ouch for me, especially since whenever I write about rape as a problem I always get a deluge of highly triggered men (and sometimes one or two highly traumatized women) calling me a man-hater and saying all kinds of nasty things to me. Secondly I have been trying not to spend too much time on the details of an election we all know is fake anyway between two establishment candidates we already know are deeply depraved.

But mostly I avoid the subject because it is just so goddamn gross. It is gross to watch liberals going around pretending they believe that Handsy Uncle Hair Sniffer would never dream of shoving his fingers into a woman without her consent. It is gross watching the language of leftism being borrowed to defend pure, relentless victim smearing. It is gross watching people who have built their political identities around pretending to care about women try to spin these allegations as Ms Reade being dishonest for partisan reasons, when in reality that is exactly what they themselves are doing.

Due to my experiences with and sensitivity to the subject matter, going through this stuff feels kind of like getting punched in the privates over and over again. There are smears everywhere, from the establishment narrative managers to their brainwashed rank-and-file herd.

Yesterday some "KHive" asshole told me that Ms Reade is mentally ill and talking about her experience will probably drive her to suicide, citing a baseless smear by McResistance pundit Sally Albright as his evidence.

There is a Twitter thread with thousands of shares going around right now where some liberal combed through all Ms Reades old tweets highlighting typos she made and claiming they show Ms Reade tweeting "in a Russian accent".

It is really, really gross.

And it hurts.

And there are definitely a whole lot of rape survivors experiencing the same thing about this story right now.

This is exactly the nightmare scenario that sexual assault survivors imagine when they contemplate coming forward.

It is why so many of them do not. Especially when their attacker is powerful.

Nobody wants to have their name dragged through the mud by widely esteemed mainstream news media outlets.

Nobody wants to have their entire past and entire social media history dug through to find anything that can be spun in the most negative light possible.

Nobody wants to be told over and over again that they are a liar, that they are crazy, that they are confused, all because they know they were sexually assaulted and said so.

Nobody wants what can easily be the most traumatic experience of their life turned into a weapon to bludgeon them with before jeering crowds of millions all around the country.

And that sucks.

It sucks because if we are to build a healthy world we are going to have to get rid of all the people who should not be in power, and the very first lot we should eliminate are the ones who abuse their power to assault the sexuality of other human beings.

If you use your power to rape people, you will with absolute certainty use it to do other unconscionable things as well, so eliminating those who do so is the first step toward health. That is step one, and we can not even get there, because blind partisan hackery turns pussyhat-wearing liberals into a bunch of snarling male supremacists.

I was 19 the first time I was raped. The last time I was 39. I never reported my attackers, for reasons the specifics of which I am not interested in explaining or defending, but let us just say that there are many messages you get sent by society telling you that if you report your rapist you are ruining a mans life, destroying his family, career and future over one "mistake". That it is better just to suck it up because you are strong and you can handle it.

You are taught that if you report your rape, you will be treated like the criminal, and the "investigation" that will take place will not put its spotlight on the accused, but on you, the accuser.

You will have to defend your life choices and your character when you are in the process of attempting to recover from a deeply harmful assault.

You are taught that if you report these things that it is you that will be shunned and shamed by members of your own tribe. And if the person is powerful, then you also know that this will likely end your career.

All these things are happening to Tara Reade right now. None of that has changed. Millions of young girls are being sent that message, once again, all across the United States of America, on screens large and small. They are being shown that if you accuse someone who has power over you of rape, you will be demonized and attacked, even by people who say they care about you, about a profoundly sensitive matter involving the most traumatic thing you have ever experienced.

And the thing is, that message is not a false message. You absolutely can be made the subject of vicious attacks if you accuse the wrong person of raping you. Attacks which press all your most painful buttons. Attacks which will try to convince you that you are insane. Attacks which will try to drive you insane.

And that sucks.

And I do not know what can be done about it.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article with its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".