Biden Is Everything The Democrats Are: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2020-05-01 at 21:46:35 )

Biden Is Everything The Democrats Are: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Joe Biden is not an "imperfect candidate" for the Democrats. He is the perfect candidate, because he is everything the party is: Demented. Decrepit. Bloodthirsty. Corrupt. Cronyistic. Authoritarian. Reactionary. Rapey. He is exactly what they deserve. He is exactly what they are.

Joe Biden is the Democrats Democrat. He is the perfect representative of the party. They should even take it a step further and replace that donkey with Joe Biden.

Joe Biden is to the Democrats as Donald Trump is to the Republicans. Everyone is just wearing their true face now.

If you are willing to sacrifice all principles, all sanity and all morality to get rid of Donald Trump, what exactly is the point of getting rid of Donald Trump?

We know Joe Biden is a liar. He has been pinged for lying his whole career. Everyone is trying to undermine the victims character in order to discredit her while ignoring Joes character. We know he lies. He also has a history of unwanted sexual advances. His story is not credible.

Nobody actually believes that Joe Biden did not sexually assault Tara Reade. Nobody is actually confident that Creepy Uncle Hair Sniffer is not a rapist, they are just pretending they are. I can understand saying "It is possible but unproven", but saying it is false is so gross and dishonest.

They are accusing Ms Reade of lying for partisan reasons, when in reality that is exactly what they are doing: they are pretending they believe Handsy Joe Biden is incapable of shoving his fingers into a woman without her consent, and they are lying. Out of pure partisan loyalty.

It is funny how refusing to support a literal dementia patient who has been credibly accused of rape for the worlds most powerful elected office is a very, very normal thing to do, yet people are acting like it is bizarre and freakish.

Which looks more likely to you? (A) That Ms Reade seeded a bunch of vicious lies about Senator Joe Biden in the 1990s with the intention of someday sabotaging his presidential bid in the distant future for some reason, or ((B) that a powerful man sexually assaulted a woman?

It is so weird how Joe Biden is a spent piece of leftover 1970s beltway flotsam made of plastic donor class dinner parties and AIPAC lobbying but everyone is all pretending they like him as a person and stuff.

There are no fact-based and intellectually robust arguments for working within the establishment to manifest revolutionary agendas, but there are a lot of highly effective intellectually dishonest arguments for why it is okay for you to pretend otherwise and go back to sleep.

"They destroyed the economy over a virus, but the narrative about the virus is completely fake!"

Perhaps. But so is the narrative about "the economy".

Terence McKenna once said "We are led by the least among us. The least intelligent, the least noble, the least visionary." Can not think of a better illustration of this than having Donald Trump versus Joe Biden competing for the most powerful elected office on the planet.

Hey remember when Donald Trump provoked a missile retaliation that led to scores of injured United States soldiers by assassinating Irans top military commander for no legitimate reason, lied about the whole thing, and then suffered no consequences or political repercussions of any kind? Good times.

Democrats are so f-cking stupid and ridiculous that the Krassenstein brothers are still a thing.

All of humanitys worst atrocities have been legal.

Genocide. Slavery. Torture.

The fact that you can squint at the imprisonment and extradition of a journalist for exposing United States war crimes in such a way that makes it look "legal" does not mean it is not unforgivably evil.

It is always about power.

Power comes before everything, including profit, which is why you see escalations against nations who would be very profitable to continue trading with and why critics of United States foreign policy are attacked far more aggressively than critics of its domestic policy.

Manipulators understand that wealth control is a means to power and not an end in itself; that is why you see things like Zuckerberg hurting his own profit margins by making changes to Facebook which make the platform less fun to use but shore up establishment narrative control.

Power trumps profit every time.

Manipulators are driven ultimately by the desire to control as many humans as possible to the greatest extent possible. Money is a useful tool for accomplishing that, but in a pinch they will swap it out for military-police force or censorship etc.

Wealth is a narrative construct and can be gained or lost or made obsolete in a new narrative paradigm. Elite manipulators understand that it is hard, nonconceptual control over hard, nonconceptual objects that gives them their actual alpha status over the rest of the humans.

"A newly democratized media environment has made it difficult for people to distinguish fact from fiction."

"Oh no! What do we do?"

"Censor everyone except authoritative news sources."

"Authoritative news sources? Like who?"

"The ones who lied about Russiagate and all the wars."

As a general rule, indie media should not attack other indie media. If you are not punching up, you are punching down.

People ask me "Well, what should we do?

How do we fix this thing?"

And of course my only possible answer is, "Do what I am doing! Or your version of it."

Of course I am doing the thing I think we should do to solve the problems of our species. Why would I be doing anything else?

Revolution is an inside job.

This is not an egoically pleasing fact, but it is a fact.

It is much more fun for egoic mind to believe both the problem and the solution exists in other people, but in reality the changes you can make in yourself will have far greater effects on the world.

There are vast, vast depths within all of us, and we are capable of making vast, vast changes to those depths.

We are in fact far more capable of doing this than we are of changing the outside world through force of will.

And interestingly when we do this, we do change the world. And we do it far more efficaciously than we can by trying to will it to conform with the noises in our babbling thinky brain.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article with its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".

__