Why You Should Oppose The Censorship Of David Icke (Hint: It Has Got Nothing To Do With Icke) by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2020-05-03 at 00:14:30 )

Why You Should Oppose The Censorship Of David Icke (Hint: It Has Got Nothing To Do With Icke) by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Within 48 hours both Facebook and then Youtube have deleted the accounts of David Icke for posting "content that disputes the existence and transmission of Covid-19 as described by the WHO and the NHS." Other platforms may soon fall in suit, as they did with Alex Jones in 2018.

This article is not about David Icke. I will say it again in italics for the especially dense: this article is not about David Icke. This article is about why we should not be okay with monopolistic billionaire-owned Silicon Valley tech giants with extensive ties to United States government agencies controlling human communication.

I know next to nothing about David Icke, and I have done exactly zero research into his views for this article; for all I know he is every bit the raving lunatic the narrative managers say he is. It does not matter. What matters is that we are seeing a consistent and accelerating pattern of powerful plutocratic institutions collaborating with the United States-centralized empire to control what ideas people around the world are permitted to share with each other, and it is a very unsafe trajectory. Making this conversation about Icke and his views distracts from the very important topic we need to actually focus on discussing.

Journalist Matt Taibbi recently wrote an excellent essay about the dangers inherent in the increased demand we have been seeing for more censorship and deplatforming during the coronavirus pandemic, correctly arguing that more authoritarian control over the ideas people are allowed to discuss is vastly more dangerous than the ideas themselves.

"The people who want to add a censorship regime to a health crisis are more dangerous and more stupid by leaps and bounds than a president who tells people to inject disinfectant," Mr. Taibbi writes. "It is astonishing that they do not see this."

"Instead of asking calmly if hydroxychloroquine works, or if the less restrictive Swedish crisis response has merit, or questioning why certain statistical assumptions about the seriousness of the crisis might have been off, we are denouncing the questions themselves as infamous," says Mr. Taibbi.

Mr. Taibbi argues against the increasingly normalized trend of elevating "authoritative" content while silencing content which does not wear that magical label in an attempt to fight disinformation. If you examine which content is considered "authoritative", you will find a bunch of outlets who have consistently lied to the world about war after war, who spent years promoting the baseless conspiracy theory that Vladimir Putin had infiltrated and secured control over the executive branch of the United States government, who consistently normalize a status quo which is wholly incompatible with the surviving and thriving of life on this planet.

Google, who owns Youtube, has been financially intertwined with United States intelligence agencies since its very inception when it received research grants from the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency for mass surveillance.

Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg has called on the government to take "a more active role" in regulating "harmful content", and has been actively collaborating with government agencies and government-funded think tanks to decide what content to remove.

Social media executives are now routinely called before government hearings and lectured about the need to increase censorship under the implicit threat of antitrust cases being brought to bear. These massive corporations now consistently censor with an extreme bias against governments which refuse to bow to the demands of the United States government and its allies.

In 2017, representatives of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were instructed on the United States Senate floor that it is their responsibility to "quell information rebellions" and adopt a "mission statement" expressing their commitment to "prevent the fomenting of discord."

"Civil wars do not start with gunshots, they start with words," the representatives were told. "Americas war with itself has already begun. We all must act now on the social media battlefield to quell information rebellions that can quickly lead to violent confrontations and easily transform us into the Divided States of America."

Whenever anyone objects to censorship on these massive platforms they are always told that those platforms are private companies who are free to do what they like on their private property, but how "private" is a corporation that is interlaced with government power with increasing inseparability?

The reality is that in a corporatist system of government with vanishingly few meaningful distinctions between corporate power and state power, corporate censorship is state censorship.

Proponents of increased internet censorship have already openly conceded this point. A recent Atlantic article by two legal professors subtitled "In the debate over freedom versus control of the global network, China was largely correct, and the United States was wrong", the case is made that western internet censorship will necessarily involve a collaboration with "private" corporations and government power.

"As surprising as it may sound, digital surveillance and speech control in the United States already show many similarities to what one finds in authoritarian states such as China," the articles authors favorably argue. "Constitutional and cultural differences mean that the private sector, rather than the federal and state governments, currently takes the lead in these practices, which further values and address threats different from those in China. But the trend toward greater surveillance and speech control here, and toward the growing involvement of government, is undeniable and likely inexorable."

Apart from the fact that they are here claiming that increasingly authoritarian speech control is good and necessary, these two bootlickers are absolutely correct. Human communication is indeed being controlled using the so-called "private sector" to circumvent constitutional limitations which prohibit the government from censoring speech directly.

These Silicon Valley tech corporations have ensured their continued monopolistic dominance by demonstrating their willingness to collaborate with establishment power structures, so there are no platforms of anywhere near the same size and influence that people can move to if they do not feel like letting government-tied plutocrats police what thoughts are permitted to enter into their minds.

This has given this corporate-government alliance the ability to control the thoughts that people are allowed to share, discuss and think about in the same way totalitarian governments can, with the false mask of freedom plastered over it.

A truly free being does not need an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to protect their mind from David Icke.

A truly free being does not want an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to exert any control whatsoever over what ideas they are permitted to share and what thoughts they are permitted to think.

A truly free being opposes with all their might any attempt to lock in a paradigm where human communication (and thereby thought) is controlled by vast unaccountable power structures which benefit from the absence of dissent.

Be a truly free being. Oppose this intrusion into your mental sovereignty.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article with its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".