Fear in the JFK Assassination, Part 1 (of 2) by Jacob G. Hornberger!
(2020-06-22 at 13:07:37 )

Fear in the JFK Assassination, Part 1 (of 2) by Jacob G. Hornberger!

One of the fascinating phenomena in the JFK assassination is the fear of some United States of Americans to consider the possibility that the assassination was actually a regime-change operation carried out by the United States national-security establishment rather than simply a murder carried out by a supposed lone-nut assassin.

The mountain of evidence that has surfaced, especially since the 1990s, when the JFK Records Act mandated the release of top-secret assassination-related records within the national-security establishment, has been in the nature of circumstantial evidence, as compared to direct evidence. Thus, I can understand that someone who places little faith in the power of circumstantial evidence might study and review that evidence and decide to embrace the "lone-nut theory" of the case.

But many of the people who have embraced the lone-nut theory have never spent any time studying the evidence in the case and yet have embraced the lone-nut theory. Why? My hunch is that the reason is that they have a deep fear of being labeled a "conspiracy theorist," which is the term the Central Intelligence Agency many years ago advised its assets in the mainstream press to employ to discredit those who were questioning the official narrative in the case.

Like many others, I have studied the evidence in the case. After doing that, I concluded that the circumstantial evidence pointing toward a regime-change operation has reached critical mass.

Based on that evidence, for me the Kennedy assassination is not a conspiracy theory but rather the fact of a national-security state regime-change operation, no different in principle than other regime-change operations, including through assassination, carried out by the United States national-security establishment, especially through the Central Intelligence Agency.

Interestingly, there are those who have shown no reluctance to study the facts and circumstances surrounding foreign regime-change operations carried out by the CIA and the Pentagon. But when it comes to the John F. Kennedy assassination, they run for the hills, exclaiming that they do not want to be pulled down the "rabbit hole," meaning that they do not want to take any chances of being labeled a "conspiracy theorist."

For those who have never delved into the John F. Kennedy assassination but have interest in the matter, let me set forth just a few of the reasons that the circumstantial evidence points to a United States national-security state regime-change operation. Then, at the end of this article, I will point out some books and videos for those who wish to explore the matter more deeply.

I start out with a basic thesis: Lee Harvey Oswald was an intelligence agent for the United States deep state. Now, that thesis undoubtedly shocks people who have always believed in the lone-nut theory of the assassination. They just cannot imagine that Mr. Oswald could have really been working for the United States government at the time of the assassination.

Yet, when one examines the evidence in the case objectively, the lone-theory does not make any sense. The only thesis that is consistent with the evidence and, well, common sense, is that Mr. Oswald was an intelligence agent.

Ask yourself: How many communist Marines have you ever encountered or even heard of? My hunch is none. Not one single communist Marine.

Why would a communist join the Marines? Communists hate the United States Marine Corps. In fact, the United States Marine Corps hates communists. It kills communists. It tortures them. It invades communist countries. It bombs them. It destroys them.

What are the chances that the Marine Corps would permit an openly avowed communist to serve in its ranks? None! There is no such chance.

And yet, here was Mr. Oswald, whose Marine friends were calling "Oswaldovitch," being assigned to the Atsugi naval base in Japan, where the United States Air Force was basing its top-secret U-2 spy plane, one that it was using to secretly fly over the Soviet Union. Why would the Navy and the Air Force permit a self-avowed communist even near the U-2? Does that make any sense?

While Mr. Oswald was serving in the Marine Corps, he became fluent in the Russian language. How is that possible?

How many people have you known who have become fluent in a foreign langue all on their own, especially when they have a full-time job? Even if they are able to study a foreign language from books, they have to practice conversing with people in that language to become proficient in speaking it. How did Oswald do that? There is but one reasonable possibility: Language lessons provided by United States military-suppled tutors.

After leaving the Marine Corps, Mr. Oswald traveled to the Soviet Union, walked into the United States embassy, renounced his citizenship, and stated that he intended to give any secrets he learned while serving in the military to the Soviet Union.

Later, when he stated his desire to return to the United States, with a wife with family connections to Soviet intelligence, Mr. Oswald was given the red-carpet treatment on his return. No grand jury summons. No grand-jury indictment. No FBI interrogation. No congressional summons to testify.

Remember: This was at the height of the Cold War, when the United States national-security establishment was telling United States of Americans that there was a worldwide communist conspiracy based in Moscow that was hell-bent on taking over the United States and the rest of the world.

The United States had gone to war in Korea because of the supposed communist threat. They would do the same in Vietnam. They would target Cuba and Fidel Castro with invasion and assassination. They would pull off regime-change operations on both sides of the Kennedy assassination: Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Cuba (1960s), Congo (1963), and Chile (1973).

During the 1950s, they were targeting any United States of American who had had any connections to communism. They were subpoenaing people to testify before the United States Congress as to whether they had ever been members of the Communist Party.

They were destroying peoples reputations and costing them their jobs. Remember the case of Dalton Trumbo and other Hollywood writers who were criminally prosecuted and incarcerated. Recall the Hollywood blacklist. Recall the Rosenbergs, who they executed for giving national-security state secrets to the Soviets. Think about Jane Fonda.

Indeed, if you want a modern-day version of how the United States national-security state treats suspected traitors and betrayers of its secrets, reflect on Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning.

That is how we expect national-security state officials to behave toward those they consider traitors and betrayers of United States secrets.

Not so with Mr. Oswald.

With him, we have what amounts to two separate parallel universes.

One universe involves all the Cold War hoopla against communists. Another one is the one in which Mr. Oswald is sauntering across the world stage as one of Americas biggest self-proclaimed communists - a United States Marine communist - who is not touched by some congressional investigative committee, some federal grand jury, or some FBI agent. How is that possible?

Later, when Mr. Oswald ended up in Dallas, his friends were right-wingers, not left-wingers. He even got a job at a photographic facility that developed top-secret photographs for the United States government. How is that possible?

Later, when he ended up in New Orleans, he got hired by a private company that was owned by a fierce anti-communist right-winger. Why would he hire a supposed communist who supposedly had betrayed America by supposedly joining up with Americas avowed communist enemy, the Soviet Union, and to whom he had supposedly given United States national-security state secrets, just like Julian and Ethel Rosenberg had?

Tomorrow: "Fear in the JFK Assassination, Part 2 (of 2)" by Jacob G. Hornberger

Reprinted here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Great Website!!