From Bombing of Hiroshima to Collateral Murder; War Crimes of Empire and Prosecution of Free Press by Nozomi Hayase!
(2020-08-12 at 21:18:42 )

From Bombing of Hiroshima to Collateral Murder; War Crimes of Empire and Prosecution of Free Press by Nozomi Hayase!

On April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released "Collateral Murder": a video showing a July 12, 2007 United States Apache attack helicopter attack upon individuals in a Baghdad suburb. Amongst the over twelve people killed by the 30mm cannon fire were two Reuters journalists.

This week marks the 75th anniversary of the detonation of United States nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima (August, 6. 1945) and Nagasaki (August, 9) during World War II. The death toll of the two atomic assaults has been estimated at over 225,000 people, with many of them killed instantly, while others died later from radiation exposure.

In the aftermath of the bombing of Japan, and for decades afterward, United States authorities suppressed the military footage shot in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

With government propaganda and censorship, the public was kept in the dark about the scale of damage and human suffering inflicted. Augusts United States nuclear strike turned Japanese soil into a toxic disarray where no life would grow for another 75 years. Contrary to their declared target (the Japanese Army headquarters), the bomb blast seared people to death: women, children and elderly, and those who were not in a uniform, indiscriminately causing long-term health effects in those who survived the blast.

British investigative journalist Robert Fisk once said, "War is a total failure of the human spirit". The fallout of the atomic bomb represents the fall of humanity and loss of its dignity. It has not only taught people all over the world about the horrors of nuclear weapons, but also emphasized the crucial role of the media in preventing terrible human errors during a time of war.

In recent years, under the Donald Trump administration, the free press has become severely threatened. On numerous occasions, President Donald Trump has expressed outrage toward "leakers", and media organizations using such leaks to disclose classified information. With the United States governments prosecution of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange, the hostility of the Donald Trump Administration toward the media has now escalated into criminalization of journalism.

Wilfred Burchetts warning to the world

Mr. Assange has been indicted on 17 counts under the Espionage Act of 1917 and one charge of conspiring with a source to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for his reporting on the United States wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the torture at Guantanamo Bay. Mr. Assange is being held on remand in Belmarsh Prison, solely on the basis of a United States extradition request. He would face 175 years in prison if convicted.

Mr. Assanges extradition is recognized by free speech groups as the most important press freedom case of the 21st century. What is this prosecution of a publisher really about? Here, a story of an Australian journalist who exposed the brutal truth of war at the end of WWII can provide a historical context and help us better understand the significance of this case.

Wilfred Burchett has become known as the first Western journalist to enter Hiroshima after the city was bombed, where he reported from one of the few hospitals operating. In the story headlined "The Atomic Plague", Mr. Burchett wrote, "Hiroshima looks as if a monster steamroller had passed over it and squashed it out of existence". The Melbourne war correspondent indicated that civilians were suffering from more than big blisters with their hair falling out.

Mr. Burchetts dispatch-often referred to as the "Scoop of the Century"-was denied by the United States administration. The deputy head of the Manhattan Project utterly dismissed it as Japanese propaganda. Mr. Burchetts firsthand, on the ground, eyewitness account was also criticized in his home country, Australia.

A documentary film "Public Enemy Number One" (1981) produced by David Bradbury showed how Mr. Burchett who gave a dire warning to the world about the horror of nuclear war, was accused of supporting "the other side" in Australia. The film posed the questions: "Can a democracy tolerate opinions it considers subversive to its national interest? How far can freedom of the press be extended in wartime?" Sadly, the enquiry seemed to have fallen on deaf ears and silence has long since prevailed.

Pushing the boundaries of free speech

Then, over decades later, a new generation Australian came forward to respond to this call. Julian Assange, through his work with WikiLeaks, began again pushing the boundaries of free speech.

WikiLeaks published a secret trove of United States classified military records of the Afghan war, revealing around 20,000 civilian deaths by assassination, massacre and night raids, followed by the Iraq War Logs, which informed both Iraqis and the international community about 15,000 previously unreported civilian casualties.

One of the most significant examples of their uncompromising public interest reporting was WikiLeaks release of classified United States military footage depicting the July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrikes against unarmed civilians. The attack killed a dozen innocent civilians, including two Reuters journalists, Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh.

The publication of the "Collateral Murder" video shattered the sheltered the United States of American view of reality, shocking everyone who has been made to think that the Iraq War was over. Dean Yates, a journalist who was in charge of Reuters bureau in Baghdad, learned for the first time of the real nature of the United States Armys bloody killing of his Iraqi colleagues via the WikiLeaks video.

Equating the significance of the "Collateral Murder" video with the Abu Ghraib photos showing United States atrocity and the real cost of war, Mr. Yates explained that "the United States military had repeatedly lied to him - and the world - about what happened". He continued, "Mr. Assange brought the truth of the killings to the world and exposed the lie that he and others had not.

Enemy of the state

Mr. Burchett, a veteran reporter for the United Kingdoms Daily Express, believed that a duty of journalists is to be independent from doctrines and political ideologies and that their responsibility is to get facts right and publish the truth.

For his fierce commitment to performing this duty, he became a controversial figure, being ostracized and made into the public enemy No. 1. Australias right wing magazine depicted him as a traitor and his fellow countryman turned against him. The Australian government deprived him of his passport for 17 years and he was barred from his own country.

Mr. Assange, who is a long-standing member of the Australian journalists union and who has won dozens of prestigious journalism awards, also displayed a similar sense of journalistic duty. He described his organizations commitment to "publish information that informs the public, even if many, especially those in power, would prefer not to see it".

Mr. Assanges efforts to defend the publics right to know have created conflicts with powerful states. After WikiLeaks disclosures of many United States governments war crimes, the Pentagon attacked the whistleblowing site - accusing it of damaging national security. United States Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen, the top United States military officer used the bombastic line of "blood on their hands," calling the WikiLeaks publications "reckless and irresponsible", even though not one single shred of evidence has ever been brought forth that any of these disclosures caused anyone harm.

From the bogus preliminary investigation of his alleged sexual misconduct in Sweden (the investigation was finally discontinued in 2019) to vilification and character assassination by United States high profile figures, Mr. Assange - as the face of the organization - came under massive political attack.

He was arbitrarily detained inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London for over 7 years, being deprived of medical care and sunlight by the United Kingdom governments refusal to honor his asylum right - despite repeated warnings from the UNWGAD. For years, while he was inside the embassy, Mr. Assange was spied on by the Spanish security contractor ostensibly working for the government of Ecuador, but - it is alleged - also secretly working on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Surveillance through video cameras and audio operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, extended into monitoring privileged conversations between Mr. Assange and his lawyers and doctors, as well as with journalists and friends. The spying even operated inside the womens bathroom.

Despite the enormous injustice levied on its own citizen, the Australian government remained subservient to their Western ally, leaving Mr. Assange feeling completely abandoned. Mr. Assange, now an exile from his own country, became a world famous political prisoner. He is moldering in a Londons maximum-security prison, being psychologically tortured, as indicated by United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer, and medical doctors who assessed him. Over 200 physicians and psychologists from 33 countries has signed an open letter calling out the Western governments coordinated abuse of power on the journalist and demanding an end to the torture and medical neglect of Mr. Assange.

Road less traveled

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki marked the end of WWII. The military officials announced to the world that the United States had defeated Nazi Germany and Japanese imperial aggression. The Foreign Minister of Japan, representing the emperor, signed the surrender agreement at a formal ceremony in the Bay of Tokyo on September 2, 1945. At that ceremony General MacArthur, United States supreme commander of the occupation of Japan, spoke: "May peace be restored".

Yet, the flash of light which had emanated from an American B-29 bomber did not illuminate a path toward peace. It blinded the eyes of both Japanese and Americans, preventing them from seeing each other truly; recognizing their shared humanity. The use of nuclear weapons by Americans, the justification for which was to hasten the end of WWII and avoid further allied casualties, brought a total devastation of Japanese cities and their residents. It created trauma and irreparable moral injury in American soldiers. In the critical hours that led to the decision of the United States government to nuke Japan, were any alternatives considered, especially as that country was already at the point of surrender?

Wilfred Burchett, the son of a Methodist lay preacher who helped rescue Jews from Nazi Germany, raised possibilities in relation to this question. While Allied journalists dutifully covered the official Japanese surrender aboard the battleship, flocking around General Douglas MacArthurs occupation headquarters in Tokyo, Mr. Burchett boarded a train to Hiroshima - alone and unarmed. Carrying seven meals, a black umbrella and his typewriter, he traveled 400 miles from Tokyo in a search for truth in the bombed Hiroshima - to recover images of dead and wounded bodies of innocent civilians buried by the mainstream media.

Mr. Burchetts honest coverage of nuclear holocaust across the Pacific Ocean challenged the official story; one which glorified the United States victory over Japan. His journalism gave voice to the silenced, allowing the victims of a terrible day of destruction to tell their side of the story. Scenes of Hiroshima turned into a living hell confronted the hypocrisy of the United States government, revealing its own brand of terror unleashed in the name of defeating fascism overseas.

Force mightier than the sword

Mr. Burchetts reporting from the other side showed how the free press could become a shield to protect innocent civilians, and could be used by ordinary people to stand up against the arsenal of the powerful. Through his journalistic activities, he aimed to convey the truth contained in the old adage "the pen is mightier than the sword". His writing warned that power cannot be tamed by power.

Mr. Burchett tried to show the United States and its Western allies that the sword of imperial Japan, expanding its dominance over East Asia, cannot be destroyed by guns, missiles and even the A-bomb. His message was that peace cannot be won by conquest; by military might, or through forced surrender and treaties. Power begets power. Peace can be only possible through our striving to understand our differences through dialogue and diplomacy.

Now, in the age of the Internet, Mr. Assange also took a road less traveled. With a computer in his arms, he used the free press as a non-violent weapon to challenge the military industrial complex. WikiLeaks, through the method of transparency, empowered ordinary people with knowledge. They opened state secrets to the democratic gaze, providing an alternative means to solve conflicts other than violence and coercion.

Uncensored images of modern war, made available through the whistleblower Chelsea Mannings act of conscience, provided perspectives that had been masked by the euphemism of "collateral damage". The United States of American people were able to see the real face of those who had been previously described to them as "enemy combatants" - children, women, ordinary civilians and even animals.

From Hiroshima to New Bagdad, Mr. Burchett and Mr. Assange, two Australian journalists generations apart, confronted the cruelty of nuclear arms and the machinery of war with love for humanity.

With great courage, they tried to demonstrate to us that it is possible to win peace through non-violence, in fact that is the only way to truly end the war.

Redemption of our own dignity

At the birth of the United States of America, the framers of the Constitution departed from the practice of the British monarchy by laying the principle of free speech as the core foundation of government, with the free press placed as a critical safeguard against tyranny.

The prosecution of Julian Assange is a direct attack on the First Amendment. The outcome of this not only determines the future of journalism, but also of our democracy. The use of violence to secure peace has only made the world more unsafe and destructive. The explosion of "Little Boy" on Hiroshima early one hot summer morning in 1945 began an arms race in nuclear warfare between the United States and the Soviet Union. From the Korean War to the Vietnam and Gulf Wars, the United States expanded its occupying forces, becoming a superpower.

Now, the empire - which covered up their dirty war in the Middle East - desperately tries to prevent the public from knowing the truth behind their prosecution of a journalist who exposed their crimes.

According to Mr. Assanges lawyers, the United States may soon drop its existing extradition request and then re-arrest him on the same 18 charges after a new extradition request. While it is intensifying assaults on press freedom, the Donald Trump administration has now withdrawn from the Treaty on Open Skies, designed to prevent an accidental war, making the world more vulnerable to the threat of nuclear annihilation.

This week, as we commemorate the worlds first atomic bomb attack of 75 years ago, it is important to remember the courage of journalists who sacrificed their personal liberty in their attempts to enable us to confront our failures and redeem our own dignity.

Mr. Assanges extradition hearing starts in a London court on September 7.

In this crucial month of August, before the trial of journalism begins, we are all called to stand up for those who have upheld freedom of speech as an alternative to our tragic past. Together, let us find strength, and our own courage in defense of free press. Let us choose a way of peace that could lead to our realization of liberty and equality of all people.

Reprinted here from "Common Dreams" has been providing breaking news & views for the progressive community since 1997. We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.