Bidens Chances Rest on a John Podesta-Planned Military Coup, Ballot Harvesting, Police Shootings, and a False Flag by Joaquin Flores!
(2020-08-30 at 23:30:36 )

Bidens Chances Rest on a John Podesta-Planned Military Coup, Ballot Harvesting, Police Shootings, and a False Flag by Joaquin Flores!

Our early August prognosis published by SCF on August 23rd, that Joe Biden would not concede the election even if Donald Trump wins, was confirmed by Hillary Clinton herself on August 25th .

This piece will follow up on the strategy involved in that piece, and develop these in light of John Podestas election war-game and the situation in Kenosha, Wisconsin. In the Kenosha situation, we have armed groups on both sides, creating a volatile situation in what increasingly looks like a pre-civil war scenario. All together, we can now see the following is evident:

Joe Bidens 2020 presidential bid now depends on a combination of a.) severe social media and search engine censorship of book-burning proportions, b.) signs from the military that they will back Joe Biden (per John Podesta ) on the heels of c.) an inconclusive election (mailed-out blank ballots), and d.) (the Soros wing of) BLMs ability engage in rioting and to pose as Donald Trump-like supporters (QAnon and adjacent, such as "Save The Children") in order to e.) conduct a dangerous or illegal public stunt (false flag).

Donald Trumps deep campaign has revolved around Christian, Gnostic, and New Age themes, which (with regard to the latter two) intersect themes of spirituality previously in the domain of the coastal left. These will form the substrate of a focus on this election being a contest of Good vs. Evil, of Light vs. Dark, of the champions of children against sexual predators, as well as anti-war and anti-vax themes; wherein "war mongers" like "Hillary Clinton", alleged child abusers like "John Podesta", and regulatory capturers of healthcare like "Bill Gates", serve as anthropomorphic reifications of unadulterated evil.

This is a novel phenomenon, and does not represent pre-Donald Trump Republican tropes and organizing issues. Mainstream Republican tropes were represented at the RNC convention, and work to establish a continuity - even if ill fitted - between traditional conservatism (previously opposed to Trump) and Trumps hardcore base.

[Image - Alleged Soros-BLM posing as a pro-Trump "Save the Children" demonstration in what some fear foreshadows a false flag]

The Coup - Color Revolution and Arab Spring

Past political contests after the assassination of John F. Kennedy appear to be based upon a consensus on key issues on international relations among elected officials, because the permanent administration had consensus on these themselves. But the rise of Donald Trump, and the great lengths a part of the permanent administration has gone to frustrate his efforts, strongly indicate that there is now a political crisis and division so great, at the level of leadership, that all the soft-power and coup methods (used by the Central Intelligence Agency abroad) are now being used within the United States against the executive branch.

A part of this permanent administration appears to back Donald Trump, or rather Donald Trump appears to be "their candidate", and this may well in part explain his electoral success in 2016 despite what appeared as overwhelming odds to the contrary.

Perhaps the most visible permutation of this division and crisis were events in the deserts of Syria and Iraq, where Pentagon backed Kurdish YPG forces fought against Central Intelligence Agency backed ISIS forces, with United States of Americans in the employ of these institutions embedded on either side, firing at each other and taking losses. It would make sense that to military intelligence, such an incoherent and openly corrosive dynamic would need to be finally headed off.

Therefore, all of the lessons drawn from the Color Revolution, Fourth Generational Warfare (4GW), counter-insurgency and hybrid warfare, learned in our study of the events of Yugoslavia, Occupy Wall Street, BLM, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Ukraine, Brazil, Venezuela and lately Belarus, all become necessary reading in order to understand the absolutely destabilized position that the United States finds itself in as we approach the 2020 election.

We should expect, in line with the color-springs tactic, that police will engage in the killings of black men, orchestrated by police secret societies operating on behest of the permanent administration (known colloquially and hereafter as the "deep state"). These will be timed in such a way for maximum utility with regard to high-low points in the campaigns of the two candidates.

Kenosha On Fire

Such an incident just occurred on August 23rd in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in the shooting of a black man, Jacob Blake. Standard and divisive motifs followed: the event was not clear cut, and definitive aspects of the case are open to interpretation and subject to confirmation bias in the publics eye. This will provoke reaction and polarization, with the nuances and facts of the situation and its context often traded in for political expedience. Pro law enforcement types more closely associated with conservative politics will say the shooting was justified prior to a hearing of the facts, and will include biographical information about Mr. Blake which demonstrates his past criminal offenses, while ignoring that these past offenses do not form the basis for legitimizing a "summary execution". Likewise, anti-police liberals will condemn the shooting as racist and unjustified, without regard to the views on race of the police involved, and without a review of the actual facts that anti-Donald Trump corporate media was reluctant to expose but which were contained in the police report. At the same time, there is a long history of police falsifying evidence and statements to justify shootings such as these.

Note that the governor of Wisconsin, the Democrat Tony Evers, is the one who declared a state of emergency for Covid-19 and an unpopular lockdown. He is a career government bureaucrat, and was met by a mobilization of armed citizens against those diktats. Yet the fall-out and riots in the aftermath of the Blake shooting, of which the Evers-mandated high unemployment (per lockdown) forms the substrate but yet expressed through BLM-Antifa riots, will be blamed on Donald Trump, whose years in public service can be counted on a single hand, and whose general efforts have been to end the lockdown and "re-open the economy". Mr Evers will not call on rioters to observe social distancing, and will call the armed detachments involved in arson and looting, "protesters", and the constitutionalist militias who deployed to protect the rights of both protestors (from police excess) and civilians (from protestor-arsonists) as "right wing".

The increasing emergence of "armed peaceful protestors", an Orwellian oxymoron as a phrase in itself, first appeared in the Syrian conflict, where American corporate media and fake-left publications like Counterpunch regularly referred to armed Al Qaeda-ISIS-FSA groups engaged in shootings and killings as "peaceful protesters".

[Video, Photo - an "armed peaceful protestor" stands off with an armored Sheriff vehicle.]
In our past pieces, we have explored the mechanisms that the DNC and the permanent administration will use to nullify or falsify the outcome of the 2020 United States presidential election in November. This included the use of Democrat governors in certain states, as we previously wrote, to declare a state winner so that its electors go to Joe Biden, in manufactured cases where the desired vote by state citizens could not be determined. It included the use of NGO employees, Labor-BLM-Antifa activists alongside contact tracers to use the coronavirus and social upheaval around manufactured racial justice issues to interfere with voters access to polls, and voters use of mailed-out ballots and ballot harvesting schemes.

In our last piece we disclosed that the DNC plans to have Joe Biden declare himself the winner of the election, whatever the pending (inconclusive, tampered, stolen, etc.) outcome may be.

In a separate piece published on FRN, this author explained that for the Donald Trump strategy against the riots to work, would require a plan that involved the co-opting of the BLM hashtag by his supporters. This would mean a separation of the BLM from Antifa, the latter being a designated terrorist group.

We explained there that this approach would be similar to that taken by Russia and Syria in the Syrian war, where certain Free Syrian Army (FSA) units had to be separated from ISIS, so that these FSA units could be considered "legitimate opposition" (a change of tact in itself, previously all armed opposition were considered illegitimate by the Syrian government), and even incorporated into joint attacks with the Syrian Arab Army (SAA - Assads forces) against ISIS.

Of particular interest will be how the public and courts view the actions of Kenosha Guard militia member Kyle Rittenhouse. These two videos, the news commentary dubbed over and to the contrary, show Rittenhouse acting in self-defense. It also shows that those with him provided first responder assistance to the man who pulled a gun on Mr. Rittenhouse and who was subsequently shot in the arm.

Censorship

We now know, per the New York Times, that Facebook execs have been meeting to implement a strategy to censor information that Donald Trump has won the 2020 election, because of the working contingency plan (which appears to still be in operation) that Joe Biden will declare victory regardless of a determinable outcome, as we previously wrote. This, however as we explained, would result in a vote in the Congress and Senate where it is likely that Nancy Pelosi may assume the presidency.

Simultaneously, Facebook execs have had a difficult time pushing against a terrified DNC which has been making irrational demands to further censorship.

Why are the DNCs Censorship demands on Facebook irrational?

The DNC demands are fear-based and reactionary, and while Facebook execs have been happy to do the bidding of the DNC and pro-deep state Republicans (still a majority), they know the requests to further censor pro-Donald Trump twitter accounts are known to produce the opposite effect. This is confirmed by the known science on the subject.

Studies of social revolutions and regime legitimacy show that further censorship in an environment where citizens have access to alternate informational lines, only erodes the legitimacy of the regime. Such a study was conducted on how the DDR tried to cover up the mass exodus of citizens into West Germany some thirty years ago [Sometimes Less Is More: Censorship, News Falsification, and Disapproval in 1989 East Germany . Christian Glaßel Katrin Paula , 2019].

Facebook execs called upon MIT to conduct a study to help establish their case, and a laymans version of these conclusions were published in MITs online magazine "Technology Review" in a piece titled, It is Too Late to Stop QAnon with Fact Checks and Account Bans.

In this article by MIT, it is reported that: "Friedberg, who has studied the movement deeply, says he believes it is "absolutely" too late for mainstream social-media platforms to stop QAnon, although there are some things they could do to, say, limit its adherents ability to evangelize on Twitter."

Like the study of the DDR and regime legitimacy, the DNC finds that the more they push for censorship, the more popular the pro-Donald Trump conspiracy theories grow.

What appears to be a work-around for this conundrum the deep state faces, is a new development, where the Soros wing of BLM has been instructed to stage at least one rally (so far) in Chicago that took place during the week of August 17th. In this, a group wearing what looked like Soros wing BLM uniforms actually carried placards associated with QAnon - such as WWG1WGA, #SaveTheChildren, #EndHumanTrafficking, and were replete with signs calling for "ending the pedophile Satanic cabal".

Mr. Podestas Simulation Sees Public Looking to Military for a Sign

Of particular interest is that John Podesta recently ran a simulation on the DNCs approach and response to election 2020, where he played the role of Joe Biden. This war-game exercise was covered by David Frum for the Atlantic. Despite its counter-factual "facts" and erroneous presumptions (poll based, etc.), the findings were startling.

Neither side would concede, courts would be too slow to act, Antifa and QAnon groups would clash in the streets, and the actions of the military, in either direction, or as with the National Guard - as deployed by the Justice Department under AG Barr, would be the deciding factor.

In that simulation there were a total of 67 players who met on Zoom in the first week of June 2020. This was composed of high-profile critics of President Donald Trump, including law professors, retired military officers, former senior United States officials, political strategists, attorneys, and cable news room editors.

We have to reiterate that Mr. Podesta, playing the role of Mr. Biden, understands that the real outcome of the election will therefore be the position that the military takes.

A wing of Donald Trumps supporters - Qanon - are adamant that military intelligence, or at least an operation within the National Security Agency, will not only back Donald Trump, but have been backing Donald Trump since before the 2016 election.

They believe this partly explains Donald Trumps victory despite what they see as an election "rigged" by Ms Clinton - thereby explaining Ms Clintons otherwise unfounded confidence that she would win by a landslide in that fateful election now four years ago.

On the other side have been several notable members of the deep state, such as Colin Powell and former Central Intelligence Agency chief John Brennan.

This all gels with the insider information that we have written about from SEIU, which as explained previously, forms the nexus between the Joe Biden ground campaign and its GOTV, Bernies "Our Revolution" and "Working Families Party", Antifa, and BLM.

Conclusion

The likelihood that the 2020 election will not produce an agreed winner, barring effective active measures from Donald Trump, is nearly certain. Based on the Northop-Standard model, Donald Trump has an over 90% chance at winning an election if following the rules in place in the past dozen election cycles. This explains why the DNC has introduced as many X factors as possible - a politicized Covid-19 response, slanted news which riles up reliable protest movement assets towards rioting and looting, and a mailed-out ballots scheme which is indistinguishable in effect from known problem vote riggings techniques like ballot harvesting.

It is clear that the DNC wants to produce no clear winner, and use some combination of article XX, XII, and provisions as reinforced by related constitutional provisions for the continuation of government, and NSDP 51.

Because there are so many variables, possible counter measures, and new "X factors" that can be introduced, this is a developing story with no clear outcome now estimable.

If it is true that the NSA is backing Donald Trump, then this provides strong reason to believe that this candidate will emerge the winner out of the fray. In either event, future X factors are almost certain.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.