Pompeo in Jerusalem: And the Walls Came Tumbling Down by Philip Giraldi!
(2020-09-03 at 14:00:52 )

Pompeo in Jerusalem: And the Walls Came Tumbling Down by Philip Giraldi!

There has been considerable controversy regarding Secretary of State Mike Pompeos Republican National Convention address pre-recorded at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem and aired last Tuesday night.

As usual however, the discussion, if one might dignify it using such a term, has been partisan in nature and focused on issues that one might consider to be of secondary importance.

The perceived problems for Democrats and their media allies have been first of all the inappropriateness of a Secretary of State getting involved at all in an electoral campaign and also the possible illegality of overseas Embassy money and resources being used in support of a political speech. Misuse of government property is, perhaps not coincidentally, a charge also being leveled against President Donald Trump for his use of the White House as a prop in his final address to the convention.

To be sure, the money issue can be fixed by the Republican National Committee reimbursing the federal government proportionate to the expenses incurred by Mr. Pompeo on his trip for the actual costs associated with the speech.

The other issue, which effectively comes down to enforcement of the Hatch Act prohibiting government employees from engaging in political activity, is admittedly more difficult, and it also runs contrary to the tradition that the Secretary of State represents the entire country and should avoid participating in explicitly partisan events. Congress Oversight committee is currently looking into the options for responding to the Mike Pompeo speech, though it is already clear that it will turn out to be the usual partisan political finger pointing exercise.

Mr. Pompeo started out by stating how Donald Trumps policies had made every United States of American, including his own family, safer. He then went on to provide the evidence, how among "bold initiatives" all over the world in foreign policy "The president has held China accountable for covering up the China virus and allowing it to spread death and economic destruction in America and around the world and he will not rest until justice is done." Mr. Pompeo then went on to give Donald Trump top marks for brokering the historic "peace deal" between Israel and the United Arab Emirates. He enthused that "This is a deal that our grandchildren will read about in their history books."

Mr. Pompeo also praised other foreign policy "successes" to include the assassination of Iranian General and "terrorist" Qassim Soleimani and the "defeat" of ISIS, both of which are, to put it mildly, greatly exaggerated.

But he saved his best news for last, praising how President Donald Trump had moved the United States Embassy to "this city of God" the "rightful capital of the Jewish homeland, Jerusalem." It was inter alia an in-your-face show of support for Israel, which was the one foreign country praised by multiple speakers on every night of the Republican convention.

If the underlying issue is that Mr. Pompeo was clearly in a political mode when praising Donald Trump and his policies, then it should be observed that the Jerusalem address differs little from what Mr. Pompeo has said on a score of occasions in Washington,D.C. and elsewhere.

That he made the comments to a narrow audience drawn from one political party is disturbing, but it could still be framed as a discussion of foreign policy before a gathering of United States of Americans.

And as for possible consequences, Mike Pompeo and Donald Trump would certainly ignore any actions initiated by inspectors general in the State Department and executive branch who might try to sanction the Secretary based on "political" comments that are sandwiched into what will be described as a foreign policy briefing.

Mr. Pompeo has in fact already fired one State Department inspector general who was reportedly investigating the Secretarys spending on gatherings that were political in nature.

The House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Eliot Engel also is working on a motion to hold Mr. Pompeo in contempt for his refusal to respond to subpoenas over his "transparently political misuse of Department resources."

An additional complaint about the speech has been the fundamentalist Christian content, which, though not in any way illegal, was regarded by many as unseemly.

But that, it might seem, is part of the more significant issues raised by the content and venue for the address. Mr. Pompeos trip to Jerusalem was timed to coincide with the Republican conference. It was not just coincidence that he was in Israel and was able to photo-op his shaking of the hand of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, guarantee the Jewish states security and appear on the big screen at the convention with Jerusalem behind him.

It was, in short, once again playing the Israel card to raise the enthusiasm level of the GOPs most loyal constituency, the Christian Zionists. And to ensure that the message was received, it was delivered by the Donald Trump administrations leading Christian Zionist, Mike Pompeo.

But the ultimate irony is that the presentation by Mr. Pompeo was essentially a bit of theater, relying on a fraudulent rendition of the United States of Americas hypothetical foreign policy successes under Donald Trump.

Donald Trumps campaign against China is very much a work-in-progress that could have a very serious downside, while simultaneously the relationship with the Kremlin, involving per Pompeo "deterring Russian aggression," has become worse than it was when the Cold War ended.

Meanwhile the United States of Americas European allies regard Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo as dangerous sociopaths.

And the "Deal of the Century" agreement between Israel and the UAE is already in tatters, with UAE representatives canceling a meeting after learning that the Jewish state has been pressuring Mr. Pompeo and the White House to block any sale of advanced F-35 fighter aircraft to the Arab state to "preserve Israels military advantage."

The agreement was a sham in any event, intended to give Donald Trump a "victory" to help his electoral prospects at the expense of the hapless Palestinians, and no other Arab states, with the possible exception of basket case Sudan, appear willing to follow the UAEs lead.

Since the so-called agreement, the Israeli air force has reverted to normal, pounding targets in both Lebanon and Syria, very little of which is being reported in the United States media.

Nor have accounts of United States of American provocations against Russian military personnel in Syria made the front pages, which, given the danger involved, is probably where they should be if the media were in any way responsible.

Indeed, one has to go to the Grayzone to learn just to what extent both of the United States of Americas leading political parties are itching for more intervention in Syria to increase pressure on Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.

Unfortunately, the message coming from Mike Pompeo in Jerusalem is not just an isolated political gambit.

The United States of America has become the instigator and sustainer of a disproportionate share of global violence.

With a hotly contested election coming up, there may be some hope that the brutal foreign policy prevailing since 9-11-01 will change, but, unfortunately, the reality is that in Washington,D.C. some things will always remain the same.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.