Menu
Paynal © 2008
The United States Weighs Into Mediterranean Tensions With Weapons and Hypocrisy!
(2020-09-18 at 15:24:54 )
The United States Weighs Into Mediterranean Tensions With Weapons and Hypocrisy!
Twice in the past week, the United States has clumsily weighed into mounting tensions in the East Mediterranean between Greece and Turkey.
First, Washington,D.C. announced last weekend the opening of a maritime security base on the island state of Cyprus, which is allied with Greece. Then the United States followed up by formally clearing the way to send weapons to Cyprus, ending a 33-year arms embargo. Washington,D.C. claims the arms are "non-lethal", but we have seen that semantic ruse played before with regard to United States weaponizing Ukraine and other places. Never mind the hairsplitting, the move is a military involvement whichever way it is presented.
Both United States moves have infuriated Turkey, which lies to the north of Cyprus and which maintains territorial claims over the northern part of the island populated by Turkish-Cypriots. The main part of the island, the Republic of Cyprus, is historically aligned with Greece. Cyprus became divided in 1974 after Turkey invaded following a coup led by the Greek military. The territory has been a source of tensions ever since and a recurring cause for confrontation between Greece and Turkey over competing claims.
This year tensions have flared up again over disputed rights to oil and gas exploration in the East Mediterranean Sea. The area is reckoned to be rich in untapped hydrocarbon resources. There are even fears of a military confrontation escalating between patrolling Greek and Turkish navy vessels.
What is remarkable too is that both neighboring states are members of the United States-led NATO military alliance, which claims to be a protector of global peace and security. Yet here we have its own members jostling on a hair-trigger which could erupt into war on the southern arc of Europe.
What is even more remarkable is the ham-handed, destabilizing way that the United States is intervening in the dispute. The establishment of a new "security" (read "military") base at Larnaca in southern Cyprus and the supply of weaponry are viewed by Turkey as a flagrant attempt by Washington,D.C. to put its thumb on the scale in favor of Greece and Cyprus against Ankara.
Last weekend, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was in Nicosia, the capital of Cyprus, where he signed a memorandum of understanding to set up the maritime base at Larnaca. Ironically, the installation is to be known by the acronym, CYCLOPS, after the mythical one-eyed giant of ancient Greek legend.
During his visit, Mr. Pompeo rebuked Turkey for stoking tensions in the region and he called for diplomatic resolution of the dispute. Mr. Pompeo went on to make a jab at Russia, saying: "Increased tensions help no-one except adversaries who would like to see division in the transatlantic unity."
The United States top diplomat appeared to be referring to a visit to Nicosia only days earlier by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. In his meeting with the Greek-Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades, Lavrov offered Moscows help in mediating the conflict with Turkey. Given Russias cordial relations with both sides, the offer by Lavrov was certainly a reasonable and pragmatic one. Why Mr. Pompeo should seek to portray the Russian intervention as pernicious only betrays the typical reflexive Russophobia that dominates in Washington,D.C.
In any case, the reality is that it is the United States which is evidently fomenting tensions in the East Mediterranean through its destabilizing initiatives. Its exhortations for diplomatic resolution is empty hypocrisy belied by its actions.
What is behind the United States moves?
One reason is the intense umbrage taken by Washington,D.C. over Turkeys decision last year to purchase the Russian S-400 air defense system. That represents a big commercial loss for the United States of American military-industrial complex. Ankaras adopting of Russian air-defense technology also grievously undermines NATO propaganda seeking to portray Russia as a security threat to Europe.
Another factor is Turkeys warnings that due to United States of American bullying over the S-400 issue it may shut down the NATO base at Incirlik in southern Turkey. If that were to happen, then the United States loses an important power-projection point against Russia. Therefore, it seems that the United States move to set up a new base at Larnaca in Cyprus may be a hedge against potential closure of Incirlik.
A third factor is proximity to Syria. Cyprus is only 200 kilometers from Syria which hosts strategically important Russian naval and military air bases at Tartus and Hmeimim. Those bases have been crucial in Russias alliance with Syria to defeat the United States-sponsored covert war for regime change in Damascus. By gaining a foothold in Cyprus, Washington,D.C. may be trying to curb Russias pivotal support for Syria.
Whatever the precise calculus, it is nonetheless clear that Washington,D.C.s posturing is both reckless and hypocritical.
Cyclops, the ill-fated clumsy giant outwitted by Ulysses, has a 21st century counterpart - the United States.
Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.