Are You Feeling Safer? "War of the Worlds" Pits U.S. and Israel Against Everyone Else by Philip Giraldi!
(2020-09-24 at 14:09:06 )

Are You Feeling Safer? "War of the Worlds" Pits U.S. and Israel Against Everyone Else by Philip Giraldi!

The media being focused on an upcoming election, coronavirus, fires on the West Coast and burgeoning BLM and Antifa unrest, it is perhaps no surprise that some stories are not exactly making it through to the evening news.

Last week an important vote in the United Nations General Assembly went heavily against the United States. It was regarding a non-binding resolution that sought to suspend all economic sanctions worldwide while the coronavirus cases continue to increase. It called for "intensified international cooperation and solidarity to contain, mitigate and overcome the pandemic and its consequences." It was a humanitarian gesture to help overwhelmed governments and health care systems cope with the pandemic by having a free hand to import food and medicines.

The final tally was 169 to 2, with only Israel and the United States voting against. Both governments apparently viewed the United Nations resolution as problematical because they fully support the unilateral economic warfare that they have been waging to bring about regime change in countries like Iran, Syria and Venezuela.

Sanctions imposed on those countries are designed to punish the people more than the governments in the expectation that there will be an uprising to bring about regime change. This, of course, has never actually happened as a consequence of sanctions and all that is really delivered is suffering.

When they cast their ballots, some delegates at the United Nations might even have been recalling former Secretary of State Madeleine Albrights claim that the death of 500,000 Iraqi children due to United States imposed sanctions had been "worth it."

Clearly, a huge majority of the worlds governments, to include the closest United States allies, no longer buy the American big lie when it claims to be the leader of the free world, a promoter of liberal democracy and a force for good.

The vote prompted one observer, John Whitbeck, a former international lawyer based in Paris, to comment how "On almost every significant issue facing mankind and the planet, it is Israel and the United States against mankind and the planet."

The United Nations was not the only venue where the United States was able to demonstrate what kind of nation it has become.

Estimates of how many civilians have been killed directly or indirectly as a consequence of the so-called Global War on Terror initiated by George W. Bush are in the millions, with roughly 4 million being frequently cited.

Nearly all of the dead have been Muslims.

Now there is a new estimate of the number of civilians that have fled their homes as a result of the worldwide conflict initiated by Washington,D.C. and its dwindling number of allies since 2001.

The estimate comes from Brown Universitys "Costs of War Project," which has issued a report Creating Refugees: Displacement Caused by the United States Post-9-11-01. Wars that seeks to quantify those who have "fled their homes in the eight most violent wars the United States military has launched or participated in since 2001."

The project tracks the number of refugees, asylum seekers applying for refugee status, and internally displaced people or persons (IDPs) in the countries that the United States of America and its allies have most targeted since 9-11-01: Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya and Syria. All are predominantly Muslim countries with the sole exception of the Philippines, which has a large Muslim minority.

The estimate suggests that between 37 and 59 million civilians have become displaced, with an extremely sharp increase occurring in the past year when the total was calculated to be 21 million.

The largest number of those displaced were from Iraq, where fighting against Islamic State has been intermittent, estimated at 9.2 million. Syria, which has seen fighting between the government and various foreign supported insurgencies, had the second-highest number of displacements at 7.1 million. Afghanistan, which has seen a resurgent Taliban, was third having an estimated 5.3 million people displaced.

The authors of the report observe that even the lower figure of 37 million is "almost as large as the population of Canada" and "more than those displaced by any other war or disaster since at least the start of the 20th century with the sole exception of World War II."

And it is also important to note what is not included in the study. The report has excluded sub-Saharan Africa as well as several Arab nations generally considered to be United States allies. These constitute "the millions more who have been displaced by other post-9-11-01 conflicts where United States forces have been involved in "counterterror" activities in more limited yet significant ways, including in: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Niger, Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia."

Yemen should be added to that list given United States military materiel assistance that has enabled the Saudi Arabian bombing attacks on that country, also producing a wave of refugees.

There are also reports that the White House is becoming concerned over the situation in Yemen as pressure is growing to initiate an international investigation of the Saudi war crimes in that civilian infrastructure targets to include hospitals and schools are being deliberately targeted.

And even the United States Congress has begun to notice that something bad is taking place as there is growing concern that both the Saudi and United States governments might be charged with war crimes over the civilian deaths.

Reports are now suggesting that as early as 2016, when Barack Obama was still president, the State Departments legal office concluded that "top United States of American officials could be charged with war crimes for approving bomb sales to the Saudis and their partners" that have killed more than 125,000 including at least 13,400 targeted civilians.

That conclusion preceded the steps undertaken by the Donald Trump White House to make arms sales to the Saudis and their allies in the United Arab Emirates central to his foreign policy, a program that has become an integral part of the promotion of the "Deal of the Century" Israeli-Palestinian peace plan.

Given that, current senior State Department officials have repressed the assessment made in 2016 and have also "gone to great lengths" to conceal the legal office finding.

A State Department inspector general investigation earlier this year considered the Departments failure to address the legal risks of selling offensive weapons to the Saudis, but the details were hidden by placing them in a classified part of the public report released in August, heavily redacted so that even Congressmen with high level access could not see them.

Democrats in Congress, which had previously blocked some arms sales in the conflict, are looking into the Saudi connection because it can do damage to Donald Trump, but it would be far better if they were to look at what the United States and Israel have been up to more generally speaking.

The United States benefits from the fact that even though international judges and tribunals are increasingly embracing the concept of holding United States of Americans accountable for war crimes since the start of the GWOT, United States refusal to cooperate has been daunting.

Last March, when the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague authorized its chief prosecutor to open an investigation into United States crimes in Afghanistan the White House reacted by imposing sanctions on the chief prosecutor and his staff lawyer. And Washington,D.C. has also warned that any tribunal going after Israel will face the wrath of the United States.

Nevertheless, when you are on the losing side on a vote in a respected international body by 169 to 2 someone in Washington,D.C. should at least be smart enough to discern that something is very, very wrong.

But I would not count on anyone named Trump or Biden to work that out.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.