Gallup: Americans Tend to Trust Only News That Confirms Their Beliefs; Highly Educated Americans Are by Far the Most Closed-Minded Group by Eric Zuesse!
(2020-09-27 at 11:33:36 )

Gallup: Americans Tend to Trust Only News That Confirms Their Beliefs; Highly Educated Americans Are by Far the Most Closed-Minded Group by Eric Zuesse!

On September 11th, Gallup headlined "Bias in Others News a Greater Concern Than Bias in Own News", and reported (based upon polling a randomized sample of 20,046 American adults) that:

"69% of Americans say they are more concerned about bias in the news other people consume than its presence in their own news (29%).” In other words: 69-29, or 2.38 times, as many Americans are closed-minded (prejudiced) regarding information-sources which do not fit their ideology, than are not.

Overwhelmingly in the United States of America, only Democratic Party information-sources are trusted by Democrats, and only Republican information-sources are trusted by Republicans.

Each side distrusts the others information-sources. Gallups news-report aptly noted the important fact that "This plays into the political polarization in the United States national discourse." The more prejudiced a population are, the more polarized it will be.

Of course, one would expect this to be the case, but Gallup has now found striking new empirical evidence for it - that the publics closed-mindedness is greatly increasing Americas political polarization.

Each side is craving propaganda instead of truth, but each sides voters want only the type of propaganda that is funded by the billionaires who also fund that sides politicians and control that sides "news" media.

Consequently, United States of American politics is controlled by the conflict between liberal billionaires versus conservative billionaires - totally controlled by billionaires (instead of by the public).

There is the liberal herd, and the conservative herd, but they are both herds - not by the public in an actual democracy. And each of these two herds is controlled by its shepherd, who are its billionaires. (Here is how that is done.) Billionaires control each Party and thereby control the Government. This is why the Government ignores the preferences of Americas public. As will be shown here, the September 11th Gallup findings help to explain how and why that results.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans can become exposed to the other sides evidence and arguments unless they see those - the other sides evidence and arguments, both for its own case and against the opposite sides case (i.e., against the case that oneself believes). Not to see the opposite sides viewpoint is to be blind to it, and thus to become locked into whatever oneself believes. This 69-29 is like a jurys rendering its verdict and nearly three quarters of the jurors having not listened to - and thus not considered - the opposite sides presentations. That is a frightening situation to exist in any court of law, and it is an equally frightening situation to exist in any nations electorate.

As a consequence of United States of Americans strong tendency to be closed-minded, Americas politics are, to a very large extent, driven more by prejudices than by the realities that the public are actually facing.

Individuals are seeking for sources that will likeliest confirm what they already believe, and are seeking to avoid sources that are the likeliest to disconfirm their beliefs.

This is consequently a population that is highly vulnerable to being manipulated, by playing up to, and amplifying, the given Partys propaganda, to which the given individual already subscribes.

Republican Party billionaires (by their use of their conservative newsmedia and think tanks, etc., which they control) can easily manipulate Republican Party voters, and Democratic Party billionaires can, likewise, easily manipulate Democratic Party voters, by their liberal media, think tanks, etc.

That is billionaires, on each of the two sides, guiding each of the two Parties voters; and, therefore, the nation is an aristocracy - a country which is controlled by its wealthiest few - instead of an authentic democracy (which is controlled not by the numbers of dollars, but actually by the numbers of residents, each one of whom is independently and open-mindedly seeking for credibly documented facts).

An aristocracy rules any such land. The public are not the rulers in such a nation. It is not a democracy; it is a collective dictatorship, by its billionaires (its aristocracy). Both of the two Parties voters vote in accord with their billionaires agenda, but especially in accord with whatever is on the agenda that is shared by both liberal and conservative billionaires - billionaires fund both of the national Parties: Democrats and Republicans, and thereby control both Parties. Billionaires, in each Party, have their very golden, very heavy, thumbs, pressing down hard upon the scale of any such "democracy", such that regardless of which group of billionaires ends up winning any ultimate election, the public inevitably will lose, because it is really just a contest between billionaires, who are stage-managing the nations entire political proceedings.

This is like two boxers fighting in a ring, in which the selection-process which placed them there was corrupt; and, so, even if the ultimate winner is not equally corruptly pre-determined, the final result has nonetheless already been rigged (during the primaries). When the contenders have been selected by a corrupt process, the ultimate outcome cannot be a democracy.

This happens not only regarding elections, but regarding particular issues. For example, in 2002 and 2003, "regime-change in Iraq," and "Saddams WMD," were just as much agendas of liberal billionaires media and think tanks as they were of conservative billionaires media and think tanks (and were thoroughly based on lies); so, a closed-minded public were actually trapped, into the lies that were agreed-upon by both sides of the domestic American political spectrum - the sides that are funded and controlled by the liberal billionaires, and by the conservative billionaires.

The nearly $2 trillion cost of the invasion and military occupation of that country, and the consequent destruction of that country, were done for the United States of Americas billionaires, and produced nothing for the American people except that enormous public debt and those injuries and deaths to Americas soldiers and to Iraqis.

And that is typical, nowadays, in this (just as in any) aristocracy: the aristocracy are served; the nations public serve to them. (In the United States, this has caused "U.S. Satisfaction at 13%, Lowest in Nine Years", as Gallup headlined on 4 August 2020; and it has caused Americas satisfaction with their Government to have ranged from its all-time low of only 7% in 2008, to its all-time high of only 45% at the very start of 2020 - well below 50%, for as long as Gallup has surveyed this.)

What all of the billionaires want is what the American public get as their Government.

It is bipartisanship amongst its billionaires. That is what produces this Governments policies. It is what determines the Government that Americans get.

However, what is basic in making it a dictatorship of the aristocracy-type (such as this United States of America is) is that the population is very prejudiced, not open-minded - not each individual constantly seeking solid evidence to change ones mind about how society works (what the reality in the nation actually is), so as for ones view to become increasingly accurate over time. Instead, ones myths are constantly being fed. Such a public, as this, are not individuals, in a democracy, but more like mobs, very manipulable.

Often, United States of Americas bipartisan views are based upon lies that virtually all billionaires want the public to believe. In such cases - and these instances are frequent - the truth is being simply ignored, or else outright denied, by both sides (and by the media, for both sides).

Individuals prejudices are thus being increased, instead of reduced, by what the public see and hear in "the news." Everyone has prejudices, and truth can predominate only if people are constantly skeptical of the sources that they are relying upon - constantly trying to root out and replace whatever false beliefs they have. This is the essence of scientific method. Democracy depends upon it. Aristocracy requires the opposite. The United States of America has the opposite.

Change away from this present situation, to a democracy, would be difficult. On both of Americas political sides, there needs to be far less trust of the Establishment (including its politicians, its media, its think tanks, etc.), in order for any real democracy to become able to exist. It is not even able to exist now. And, therefore, it does not exist.

But what is even more depressing is that the United States of Americas educational system, most especially its colleges and universities, are encouraging, instead of discouraging, this situation, this closed-mindedness.

The more educated an United States of American is, the more closed-minded that person becomes - as is further shown in this same September 11th Gallup news-report:

"Whereas 52% of Americans with a high school education or less are more concerned about bias in others news than in their own [and 45% of that minimally educated group think that the news which they are reading might be biased], the figure is 64% among those with some college education and is even higher among college graduates (73%) and those with postgraduate education (77%) [and only 22% of that maximally educated group think that the news which they are reading might be biased]." The most-educated Americans are the most-manipulable (the most closed-minded) Americans.

No finding in this Gallup report was as extreme as the finding that the more highly educated an American is, the less open that person is likely to be to changing his or her mind (outlook) about the situation. In other words: the more educated an American is, the more closed-minded that person tends to become. Higher education in America increases, instead of decreases, an individuals closed-mindedness. However, other contrasts which were almost as extreme are:

"Those who identify as liberal (80%) are more concerned than conservatives (68%) and moderates (65%) with other peoples media bias." In other words: liberals are 80-65 or 1.23 times as closed-minded as are moderates, and are 80-68 or 1.18 times as closed-minded as conservatives are.

"While 58% of Black adults are more concerned about bias in others news than in their own, fully 73% of Asian Americans and 72% of White adults say the same." Thus, African-Americans are 58-72.5 or 80% as closed-minded as are Euro-Americans and Asian-Americans.

This is the worst combination possible: it is a closed-minded population, which is especially closed-minded amongst its most educated segment. The leading segment is also the most closed-minded segment. These are crucial agents of the billionaires, and they crucially inculcate into the next generation of Americans the aristocracys values.

This means that the leaders keep themselves, conceptually, inside a cocoon.

They have minimal contact with the most vulnerable members of the society, which is the less-educated members. That enhances inequality of opportunity, throughout the society. Since the most-highly-educated Americans are the group that are the most-closed to opinions which are contrary to their own, it is easy for the most-highly-educated Americans to view individuals who disagree with those persons views as being simply a "basket of deplorables."

Their disagreement then becomes their contempt. "Facts" about politics are - for those persons, highly educated persons - more derived from their values and priorities, than their values and priorities are derived from the political facts.

Scientific epistemology is being turned upside-down, regarding political issues, in such a country.

Overwhelmingly, some sort of faith, instead of any sort of science, determines what individuals in such a country believe about politics. In every aristocracy, this is the way that both conservative and liberal persons view any persons in the general public who oppose themselves: they are viewed as being a "basket of deplorables." It is the very essence of elitism - on both sides. (For prominent examples of this: both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump had contempt for each-others voters - blotted them out.)

The leaderships minimal contact with the public makes exceedingly unlikely the leaderships compassion, concern about the sufferings that they, themselves, are causing down below.

Actually, though every aristocracy claims to want to improve conditions for their public, the reality is that whenever doing that would entail their own losing power, that claim becomes exposed to be sheer hypocrisy - a lie; often a self-deception, and not merely a deception against the public.

Deceiving themselves about their own decency is easy, because they have minimal contact with the most vulnerable members of the society, the very people whom they claim to care the most about (and to be working in politics to help).

Fakery is built into each and every aristocracy. United States of Americans strong tendency to be closed-minded causes the aristocratic con to be widely accepted as if it were instead truth. (Again: the "WMD in Iraq" con was a good example of this - the aristocracys media just blocked-out the reality.) Scientific studies have even demonstrated that the wealthier a person is, the less compassion the individual tends to have for people who are suffering.

Furthermore, since the less-educated persons aspire to be more-educated, they are - even without knowing it - aspiring to become less open to contrary views, instead of to become more open to such views.

One bad consequence of this is: it strangulates imaginativeness, openness, and creativity, in favor of being rote, rigid, and bureaucratic.

Another bad consequence of it is that the authority-figures, in such a society, are, in some important ways, actually inferior to the rest of the population.

Moreover, Americas colleges and universities are not increasing their students open-mindedness (as they should) but the exact opposite - they are reducing their students open-mindedness.

Even if professors are teaching some truths, the professors are training their students to be authoritarian, instead of to be open to a more truthful, comprehensive, and deeper understanding, which encompasses those truths, but also many more - which the majority of professors either ignore or else deny, because such deeper understanding violates the existing Scripture, or standard viewpoint (shaped by both sides billionaires). At least in the United States, this is now the normal situation. That Gallup poll showed it not merely weakly, nor even only moderately, but extremely.

This is a perverse situation, which bodes ill for the future of the entire nation.

Any country which is like this is not only an aristocracy instead of a democracy, but it is greatly disadvantaged, going forward.

It will be disadvantaged both in the arts and in the sciences. Its future will be stultifying, instead of dynamic.

Aristocracies tend to be this way.

Also, because it will remain highly polarized, its internal ideological frictions will waste a large proportion of the nations efforts.

As a nation, its forward-motion, its progress, will thus largely be crippled, by its internal discord and distrust, between the two warring factions of its aristocracy - and friction between the respective followers on each side.

This describes a declining culture - a nation that is in decline.

That is what this poll-report, from Gallup, indicates, as clearly as any poll-findings can.

It indicates a nation in decline.

During the Presidential primaries in the Democratic Party, a major point of difference between the two major candidates, Joe Biden versus Bernie Sanders, was whether billionaires are bad for the country: Biden said no; Sanders said yes. (This was a major reason why the billionaires made sure that Sanders would lose.) In any country where wealth-inequality is so extreme, there can be no authentic democracy.

The United States of Americas extreme inequality of wealth makes democracy impossible in this country. Americas other problems follow from that. In reality, it is a one-party state, and that party is controlled not actually by the counts of voters, but by the counts of dollars.

It is an aristocracy; and its decline - to what has been documented here - follows from that fact.

Whatever democracy the United States of America might once have had is gone now. It has become replaced by a land of mass-deceptions, which are bought and sold.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.