Blinken Talks the Talk, but Will He Walk the Walk? by Martin Sieff
(2021-03-09 at 02:12:46 )

Blinken Talks the Talk, but Will He Walk the Walk? by Martin Sieff

President Biden has so far made no move whatsoever to rein in the continued bold and potentially very dangerous United States military exercises with allies right up to the very borders of Russia.

Secretary of State Antony Blinkens March 3 speech at the United States State Department should be warmly welcomed around the world, especially in Caracas and Tehran: It does indeed mark a highly significant shift in United States foreign policy and deserves to be taken at face value: But it does not address fundamental policy conflicts with Russia and China that President Biden inherited from his predecessors - and not just Donald Trump. And it is these far bigger, unaddressed issues that may very well yet propel the world into a nightmarish thermonuclear war.

Mr. Blinken in his speech made an acknowledgement that his predecessors Mike Pompeo, Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton would never have been capable of - and that John Kerry was never allowed to admit.

Mr. Blinken openly admitted that there had been United States efforts to topple governments by force that Washington,D.C. was critical of. He further openly acknowledged that some of those efforts had failed and that they had badly discredited the cause of democracy and the United States itself around the world.

"We will incentivize democratic behavior, but we will not promote democracy through costly military interventions or by attempting to overthrow authoritarian regimes by force. We tried these tactics in the past. ..they have not worked. They have given democracy promotion a bad name and they have lost the confidence of the American people. We will do things differently," Mr. Blinken said.

There is every reason to believe that Mr. Blinken was sincere in his commitment to forswear efforts at regime change in both Iran and Venezuela.

First, the very day before his important speech, Mr. Blinken held a telephone conversation with Venezuelan opposition politician Juan Guaido, whom Trump, Pompeo and then National Security Adviser John Bolton farcically tried to promote as the legitimate president of Venezuela. United States allies around the world, especially in Europe and Latin America have been humiliatingly led by the nose to publicly support this absurd contention, akin to incredibility to claiming that Venezuelas great Angel Falls flow up not down, or that the World is Flat.

No details of what Mr. Blinken discussed with Guaido have yet emerged at this time of writing but it is very clear what the secretary of states message was: Like so many previous corrupt and vanity-filled dupes eager to grab the coattails of Americas imagined New Rome global imperium, Guaido was told he was going to be thrown under the bus.

This move is clearly demanded by United States pragmatic interests. If there is one lesson that Wall Street and its United States government servants have followed for the past 150 years since the rise of John D. Rockefeller and J. P Morgan: It is to back Winners and throw Hopeless Losers to the wolves.

Mr. Guaido certainly counts as a Hopeless Loser: He has gained no discernible political, popular or military support within Venezuela, despite the continuing suffering caused by the ongoing United States economic war launched against Caracas by President Joe Bidens old boss and close friend Barack Obama in 2014 and then enthusiastically intensified by Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo.

Does that mean the economic war against Venezuela will end? Certainly not. Mr. Blinken himself, like his master, President Biden supported it 100 percent during the Barack Obama administration. And the new administration, already the source of Republican wrath for its domestic economic and social policies, will not casually open up a new front where it can be attacked as wimps.

Like brutalized children, liberal Democrats have been terrified of such accusations ever since Senator Joe McCarthy accused them of "losing China " (China was never theirs to lose) and being soft on communism back in 1950.

Also, ending the economic war on Venezuela would require decisive and original action and Mr. Blinken, like Joe Biden and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, has owed his long, slow, steady rise precisely to following the golden rule of liberal Democrats since the days of party presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson in the 1950s: Never take a strong, sustained position on anything , good or bad. Even when you see a policy is leading you off the edge of a cliff, just slow it down a bit and still tumble over the cliff to your political doom. Never dare to actually stop, or reverse any disastrous course of action.

These simple principles determined the endless foreign policy fiascos of Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama and even to some degree Bill Clinton.

Clinton was led by the nose, though reluctantly, to bomb Serbia and risk needless confrontation with Russia by his secretary of state Madeleine Albright and her lifelong mentor, Russia-phobic former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Mr. Blinkens foreswearing of any effort at direct regime change therefore appears to be part of a policy that while initially appearing moderate will never lead to anything truly constructive.

Blinken, like Biden and Sullivan, wants to restore United States participation in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran for no better reason than that they all supported it and helped negotiate it in the first place for Barack Obama.

However, the new administration has already made clear it does not dare risk driving Saudi Arabia into China or Russias arms. Mr. Blinkens speech may indeed lead to the return of United States participation in the JCPOA, something Americas European allies and the Iranians would both welcome. But it looks unlikely so far to lead to anything else.

Also, so far, President Biden has so far made no move whatsoever to rein in the continued bold and potentially very dangerous United States military exercises with allies right up to the very borders of Russia. Yet if these moves had been carried out by the Russian Air Force and Navy off the shores or close to the territories of the United States, they would provoke complete outrage.

Similarly, the United States armed forces are plunging ahead, secure in both administration and bipartisan congressional support, to step up military deployments in the Western Pacific openly proclaimed as containing China within the two Island Chains of the great ocean.

Mr. Blinkens speech should indeed be welcomed as a positive first step towards reducing global tensions: But it is far too early to celebrate whether he will continue to walk the walk even while he talks the talk.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.