Opposing All Governments Equally Is Supporting The Most Powerful Government by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2021-04-01 at 02:22:27 )

Opposing All Governments Equally Is Supporting The Most Powerful Government by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

The United States-centralized empire is waging nonstop wars that have killed millions of human beings just since the turn of this century, and people will still say things like "We have really got to do something about Cuba."

The United States-centralized empire is circling the planet with hundreds of military bases, working to destroy any nation which disobeys its dictates and brandishing armageddon weapons at its enemies like a drunken hillbilly with a shotgun, and people are still like "Something must be done about Chinas intellectual property theft!"

Among the violent and destructive governments in our world, one towers high above all the others in a league entirely of its own. Add in the malign behavior of its allies, who effectively function as arms of the same single empire on foreign policy, and the gap between it and the next-worst offender grows even greater. And yet, somehow, many people act as though this power structure should not face a unique level of criticism and scrutiny.

A lot of propaganda-addled empire loyalists bleat the terms "whataboutism" and "false equivalency" at anyone who responds to criticisms of nations like Russia or China by pointing out the terrible things the United States does and continues to do, implying that America is far better than those other nations and that even bringing them into the same conversation is absurd. And they are correct, it is absurd, but for the exact opposite reason they think: the United States is far, far worse.

There is no other power structure that is anywhere near as violent, thuggish and authoritarian as the one that is currently using its military and economic might to murder, starve, bully and cajole the rest of humanity into submission and obedience to its interests.

No one else comes anywhere remotely close.

Any analysis of international dynamics which fails to place this fact front and center in its understanding is necessarily a flawed, power-serving analysis.

It is not just the brainwashed human livestock of the mainstream who fail to take this reality into account, but also many self-styled "anarchists" and other ideologues who fancy themselves to be up-punching critics of power.

The mantra "I oppose all governments equally" will often see such types enthusiastically supporting the downfall of United States-targeted governments like Syria and China, simply because those governments are more authoritarian than they would like.

Because it is not informed by a reality-based weighting of world power dynamics as they actually exist, their "anti-authoritarianism" sees them supporting the most tyrannical agendas of the most tyrannical power structure on earth.

You will hear them called "anarcho-imperialists" or "anarcho-neocons" by anti-imperialists; people whose internet anarchism leads them to actively facilitate western propaganda initiatives against targeted governments because those governments are not pure and utopian enough for the delicate sensibilities in their blond dreadlock-adorned heads.

They will pay lip service to opposing the United States government too, but "opposing all governments" without that opposition reflecting the fact that one government is orders of magnitude worse than any other is supporting that very government.

The fallacy of "I oppose all governments equally" is best summarized by the Anatole France quote, "In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." All things are not equal, and treating all governments as though they are the same will always serve the interests of the most powerful government.

It is like those United States of American libertarians who say "I oppose all forms of welfare, including corporate welfare!"

Well guess what mate?

Put your shoulder against that value system and shove, and then watch whose welfare ends up getting cut. I will give you a hint: it will not be the rich guys.

Force always flows most freely when it is being directed against those who power opposes, next most freely when it is directed against those to whom power is indifferent, and least freely when it is directed against the most powerful themselves.

It is always far easier to flow with power than against it; that is why the richest people are always those who collaborate with existing power structures. Firing your energy at "all governments equally" will see that energy picked up and ran with wherever it opposes the governments the largest power structure does not like.

As journalist Maitreya Bhakal recently put it:

"Neither Washington,D.C. nor Beijing", is essentially (and secretly) a pro-Washington, anti-Beijing position. Equating both sides always helps the more evil side. Just because both the United States and China are wrong, does not mean both are equally wrong.

The problem is the nation that is infinitely less wrong than the other, is criticized infinitely more. Criticism should be proportional to the crime. This is why those who push for "equality before law" in China - ignore it while comparing China to the United States.

It is basically like saying "Neither Hitler nor Obama": Imagine how pleased Hitler would be at being equated with Obama - no matter the latters crimes.

Those who call for nuance when opposing "whataboutism" fail to apply nuance when comparing the United States and China.

Thus, the effect (and in many cases, the purpose) of Bothsidesism is to not only to make the more evil side look less evil, but also to justify the more evil sides evil atrocities against the less evil side.

People often tell me "You do not oppose imperialism, you only criticize United States imperialism!"

And to them I always reply, well, show me the other government that is circling the planet with hundreds of military bases, waging nonstop wars and orchestrating the destruction of any nation which disobeys it. I will criticize that one too.

I make no bones about the fact that I prefer to focus my criticisms on the most powerful and destructive power structure in the world. It is not weird and suspicious to do this, it is weird and suspicious that more people do not do it.

It is the sane and normal thing to do, and the fact that this is not the default assumption says so much about how extensively our society is wound around the convenience of the powerful.

Not only is focusing your opposition on the most powerful and destructive government the most rational use of your energy, it is also impossible to circulate criticisms of United States-targeted nations without facilitating and participating in the United States propaganda campaigns against those governments.

I guarantee you that if I changed my tune and suddenly began authoring articles decrying the treatment of Alexei Navalny and the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province, those articles would go more viral than anything I have ever written, because they flow in the direction of existing imperialist propaganda campaigns. I would be responsible for the consequences of my doing this.

And there would be consequences.

Before they launch missiles, they launch narratives.

Before they drop bombs, they drop propaganda.

The path to every bullet in every war is paved with mass-scale narrative manipulation, and when we choose to participate in that paving we are just as culpable for the death and destruction that ensues as the guys who drop the actual bombs.

The devastating effects of war against nations like Syria or Iran and the potentially world-ending consequences of cold war aggressions against Russia and China rest on the shoulders of those who helped circulate the narratives which facilitated them.

So be real with yourself about what you are putting out there, and be responsible about it.

Be mindful of whether you are helping to advance an agenda with a lot of energy behind it from the most powerful forces on earth, because those are the agendas that will be enacted.

Do not let your "anarchism" turn you into a goddamn stormtrooper for the empire.

Thanks for reading!!
Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".