Covid-19-Policy Contest Between Libertarianism v. Socialism: The Latest Results by Eric Zuesse!
(2021-05-03 at 00:07:59 )

Covid-19-Policy Contest Between Libertarianism v. Socialism: The Latest Results by Eric Zuesse!

A great deal remains that is important to know but that is currently unknown about Covid-19, Eric Zuesse writes.

Early in the "coronavirus-19" - subsequently called "Covid-19" - pandemic, Denmark and Sweden were often being compared with one-another because both are Scandinavian countries, but on 13 March 2020, Denmark had started a lockdown and imposed strict recommendations for businesses and personal behavior, whereas Sweden did nothing of the sort, and so the two countries were considered to be especially suitable to serve as being an almost controlled experiment in what the results would be of socialism versus libertarianism in social policy (regulations) regarding a communicable disease.

On 26 March 2020, EuroNews headlined "Neighbours Denmark and Sweden miles apart on coronavirus confinement". Whereas both countries had socialized healthcare, and were also otherwise generally considered to be similar, Sweden was pursuing Europes most libertarian policies on coronavirus or Covid-19, and yet Denmark had a 15% higher percentage of its population who had come down with that disease.

On 29 June 2020, I headlined "Herd Immunity" Is a Failed Response to Coronavirus: Comparing Denmark versus Sweden on Coronavirus," and reported that in early April Swedens population-percentage who had the disease had switched (increased so fast as) to become 14% higher there than Denmarks population-percentage who had Covid-19, and that Swedens percentage was also increasing much more quickly than Denmarks.

And, so, at that time, as of 28 June 2020, Sweden had 2.5 times as high a percentage of its population who had contracted the disease, as compared with Denmarks percentage. There were 131 reader-comments to that news-report, at Reddit, and they were overwhelmingly in denial, and pro-libertarian, anti-socialist, though each comment had a different excuse for their reality-denial.

CNN headlined on 28 May 2020 "Sweden says its coronavirus approach has worked. The numbers suggest a different story" and made clear that, at least up till that moment in time, Swedens approach was a failure, not only in competition as compared to Denmarks, but globally.

Then, on 12 May 2020, Foreign Affairs, the prestigious journal of Americas Council on Foreign Relations, bannered "Swedens Coronavirus Strategy Will Soon Be the Worlds: Herd Immunity Is the Only Realistic Option-the Question Is How to Get There Safely", and presented the standard libertarian argument: "There are good reasons for countries to begin easing their restrictions. It will take several years to tally the total number of deaths, bankruptcies, layoffs, suicides, mental health problems, losses to GDP and investments, and other costs attributable not just to the virus but to the measures used to fight it. It should already be obvious, however, that the economic and social costs of lockdowns are enormous."

In other words: the best "regulation" is to let nature rule, not to impose any human-imposed regulations, but just "the free market" should reign.

On 7 January 2021, the Scandinavian Journal of Public health headlined "A comparison of COVID-19 epidemiological indicators in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland" and reported that:

Compared with its Nordic peers, Sweden had a higher incidence rate across all ages, a higher COVID-19-related death rate only partially explained by population demographics, a higher death rate in seniors care, and higher all-cause mortality. Sweden had approximately half as much mobility change as its Nordic neighbours until April and followed similar rates as its neighbours from April to July. Denmark led its Nordic peers in testing rates, while Sweden had the highest cumulative test-positivity rate continuously from mid-March...

Looser government restrictions at the beginning of the outbreak are likely to have played a role in the impact of COVID-19 in Sweden. In an effort to improve epidemic control, Sweden has increased testing rates, implemented more restrictive prevention measures, and increased their intensive care unit bed capacity.

Here are the figures as-of 30 April 2021:

Denmark cases per million = 43,282

Sweden cases per million = 95,909

Denmark deaths per million = 428

Sweden deaths per million = 1,384

Denmark March unemployment rate = 4.5%

Sweden unemployment rate = 10.0%

But Denmark versus Sweden are not, by any means, the only indicators that libertarianism was failing on Covid-19.

On 1 August 2020, I headlined "India and Brazil Are Now the Global Worst Coronavirus Nations", and that statement was forward-looking, predictive, and not referring only to the numbers at that time but to where the various nations were heading, and it was referring only to medium-sized and large nations (for example, not to the worst performer of all, Andorra, which currently has 171,029 cases per million and a population of only 77,367 people). (Andorra has had a total of 13,232 cases, which is 17.1% of its entire population. The only country that has a population of over 10 million and which is among the 9 worst - and America scores as being absolutely the worlds 10th-worst - is Czechia, the Czech Republic, which has 152,046 cases per million. At the end of this article, Czechia will be discussed.)

As-of 30 April 2021, the following are the worlds only nations that have had more than 6,000,000,000 Covid-19 cases:

USA = 33,044,872

India = 18,881,587

Brazil = 14,592,886.

Those are now the Covid-19 giants (the worst-performing major countries), which, back on August 1st, is what I was expecting them to be, by the present time. Ultimately, I expect Brazil and India to be scoring even worse than the United States. All three countries have been exceedingly lax in their anti-Covid-19 policies, extraordinarily libertarian regarding this.

On 20 September 2020, I headlined "All 8 of Americas Worst-Hit Coronavirus States Are Now in the South." That reported "the worst 11 states - are: Louisiana, Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Iowa, Arkansas, and Texas" - and all 11 of them had voted for Donald Trump, the more-libertarian (and losing) candidate, in 2020. The United States therefore provides overwhelming evidence of the failure of libertarianism regarding coronavirus-policies.

On 14 March 2021, I headlined "Republican States Have Higher Covid Rates than Democratic States" and - ranking all from the best (#1) to the worst (#51) - reported that the average state which had voted for Donald Trump scored 33.3 or two-thirds of the way down the list of the 51 states + DC, and that the average state which had voted for Joe Biden scored 19.5 out of the 51.

The more corrupt a country is, the more libertarian it is, and on 5 May 2020, I headlined "Americas Design Causes It to Fail the COVID-19 Challenge" and reported that because America is an extraordinarily corrupt country (very libertarian, as compared to other nations), "America is designed so as to fail the coronavirus-19 challenge. The power of big-money (concentrated wealth) is destroying this country. It controls both Parties and their respective media, so the public does not know (and certainly cannot understand) the types of realities that are being reported (and linked-to) here."

India and Brazil are nipping at Americas heels on this, but, still, the record up till the present moment shows the United States of America as still retaining its title as being the worst of all major nations on coronavirus-performance.

Finally, here, will be considered what might be the strongest exception to the general principle that libertarian policies are inferior to socialistic policies in order to control and limit a pandemic: Czechia. Wikipedias article "COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic" says:

The Czech Republic was the first[11] European country to make the wearing of face masks mandatory from 19 March onwards.[12] COVID-19 testing was made widely available with drive-through locations from 14 March,[13] and from 27 March anyone with a fever, dry cough or shortness of breath was eligible for a free test.[14] From 13 April onwards, COVID-19 testing capacity significantly surpassed demand.[15] Contact tracing in the country also included voluntary disclosure of mobile phone position and debit card payments data for previous days and the quarantining of identified contacts.[16] By 1 May 2020, altogether 257 COVID-19-related deaths were identified in the Czech Republic compared to 2,719 in similarly populous Sweden, which did not impose a full lockdown. However, Belgium, also with a similar population, had suffered 7,866 deaths at that time, despite having implemented an early and strict lockdown...

By April 2021, the Czech Republic has recorded the highest confirmed death rate in the world after Hungary. There are some root causes speculated.

None of those proposed explanations of this is any sort of scientific explanation for it. A great deal remains that is important to know but that is currently unknown about Covid-19.

Obviously, Czechia is the most challenging case, not because it is the worst, but because it has been a leader in adherence to international guidelines but has nonetheless disastrously failed on this virus.

If that is not a warning for the world to do lots more research on the Covid-19 problem, then nothing is.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.