The Way Out of the Impasse Between Iran & U.S. by Eric Zuesse!
(2021-05-10 at 00:37:33 )

The Way Out of the Impasse Between Iran & U.S. by Eric Zuesse!

President Biden chose an astoundingly stupid and arrogant policy of the United States & United Kingdom imperium, instead of criticizing and renouncing his immediate predecessors policies on these matters.

On June 18th, Iran will hold its Presidential election. The current Government is led by Irans moderates, who are the people that are not closed-minded to the possibility of the United States of Americas being less than 100% determined to take back Iran as America had grabbed that country in the 1953 U.S. coup there, which ended Irans democracy and installed the brutal and much-hated fascist Shah Reza Pahlevi.

The non-moderates in Iran will not negotiate with the United States, and never did. Restoration of the Iran deal will be impossible if the non-moderates again win power there. But we have only until before that June 18th election to restore it, if it is to be done at all.

There is a superb explanation of this situation, by Alexander Mercouris, in a 38-minute talk by him at The Duran on 2 May 2021, and it is a preface to everything that I shall here be adding to it, which will be only my policy-conclusions which follow, I believe, quite logically, from the facts that he so clearly and accurately presents there. That video (which I recommend everyone to listen to) can be seen "here":

He concludes by saying (and I add my comments [in non-italics and in-between brackets]), starting at 31:50-

We will see, over the next few weeks, whether the United States and Iran are able to overcome their common mistrust [which has resulted from Donald Trumps having cancelled the Iran deal, which had taken years to negotiate] and find a way forward, or whether opponents of the JCPOA [the Iran deal] in the United States, in Saudi Arabia and Israel, and in Iran itself, will instead prevail.

I should say that I think that this is going to be a key moment in the Middle East. If the United States is able to re-enter the JCPOA, after having made various steps to walk away from it [Bidens having promised that he would not return to it unless Iran would first agree, in advance, to making concessions, beyond those it had made in the JCPOA, which - if Iran, which had adhered to the deal, which the U.S. did not, were to do that - would outrage the Iranian public and thus guarantee the current Iranian Governments fall and replacement by the non-moderates; so, that demand by Joe Biden was stupid in the extreme], but if it re-enters it on Iranian terms [that is, unconditionally, which is the only way for the deals violator to be able to return to the deal], then it would be very difficult for people in the Middle East to see it [because Biden had promised not to do that]] as anything other than a major concession and a signal that the United States is, indeed retreating from the Middle East.

Iran will, at that point, be in the ascendant, and it will probably increase its influence in places like Iraq, and possibly Syria and Lebanon also.

The Saudis and Israelis, by contrast, will be dismayed, and no doubt they will consider what steps they should take, possibly distancing themselves, to some extent, not perhaps from the United States, but from this Administration [meaning that many mega-donors to the Democratic Party while Biden or Harris are leading the Party will quit or greatly reduce their donations to it, and that Republicans will probably then easily retake the United States White House in 2024].

The alternative, however, it seems to me, is worse [for the United States and everyone]. If the United States and Iran cannot agree a way forward, and the JCPOA [restoration] fails, then the situation is set up for a showdown, at some point, between the United States and Iran, with Iran, almost certainly in that case, pushing forward [under rule by its non-moderates] with its nuclear enrichment program, and forging, at the same time, ever-closer ties with the new Eurasian powers, Russia and China, which are increasingly working together. At that point, some kind of military hostilities, in the Middle East, become more likely.

The United States, once more, finds itself in a difficult position. It does so because of the way in which it has inserted itself, to such a degree, in the affairs of the Middle East, which, in some ways, it does not fully understand, and which it is certainly unable to control.

Trying to build long-term policy in the Middle East by an outside power, like the United States has done, is like trying to build a castle on a foundation of sand. The edifice might look imposing for a while, but eventually it crumbles.

It seems to me that, whatever happens, over the next few weeks, we are going to see, with these negotiations, the beginning of that long retreat, or, rather, a further step in that long retreat, of the United States, from the Middle East, and [from] that era, which began in the 1970s, when the United States managed to establish itself as the prevailing overwhelmingly dominant power across the Middle East and the country that essentially decided the course of decisions and events there.

So, this will be a step towards the end of an era. If so, however - if the United States manages to withdraw in an orderly way by agreeing to the JCPOA, despite the embarrassment and, to some extent, the humiliation [because Biden has promised not to do this] that it will suffer - that will at least provide a route for a dignified farewell.

If, on the other hand, the negotiations fail, and the JCPOA dies, then the eventual outcome of an United States of American retreat from the Middle East will probably happen still, but the sequence of events will be disorderly, chaotic, and, perhaps, violent.

Joe Biden chose, when he entered office in January, to commit his Administration to Donald Trumps foreign policies.

He accepted the relocation of the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, which was a slap in the face to the Palestinians.

He accepted Donald Trumps acceptance of Barack Obamas policy that Crimea and Donbass - which had separated themselves from Ukraine after Barack Obamas coup which had seized Ukraines government in February 2014, as a result of a plan by Obama which had started forming in Obamas Administration in 2011 - must be seized back by Ukraine, and Biden promised that the United States would help Ukraine to do that.

And he accepted Trumps continuation of Obamas plan to oust Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria and replace him with leaders who would be selected by the Saud family.

He also accepted Obamas and Trumps change in American policy on Taiwan, toward switching away from the decades-long "one-China" policy of refusing to grant separate-nation status to Taiwan, toward now sending officials to Taiwan in violation of that policy and toward sending warships to the Taiwan Strait (internationally recognized by every nation except America to be Chinese territory) as a threat and preparation for publicly demanding that Taiwan be recognized by the United Nations as being a separate nation and no longer a province of China.

All of these policies were build-ups toward some hoped-for surrender by Russia, and by China, and by Iran, to Biden, which would supposedly happen in some way without direct military conflict between the United States and Russia, and-or China, and-or Iran.

Furthermore: Biden continues Trumps - who continued Obamas - policy to get the United Kingdom Government to transfer Julian Assange from a British super-max prison in solitary confinement to a United States Supermax prison in solitary confinement so that the United States can permanently remove Julian Assange from access to the public and perhaps execute him on totally bogus charges.

Mr. Assange has never been convicted of anything and has been imprisoned by the United Kingdom Government for over a decade, awaiting a court ruling that he can be extradited to the United States for elimination.

Here was the first day of his only trial, which ended in no conviction and in what was expected to be his release from that super-max prison, and both on that first day and on the last day of his trial (as can be seen there), British ‘justice’ was clearly outrageous and suitable only for a dictatorship.

Furthermore, instead of that regime releasing him, the United States regime under Trump and now continuing under Biden appealed United Kingdoms ruling that had declined to extradite him, and both the UK and the U.S. Governments are keeping him in that UK supermax solitary confinement until UK either announces that he is dead or else extradites him to a U.S. prison to await his death in some American prison — regardless of whether or not he ever becomes convicted of anything.

President Biden chose this astoundingly stupid and arrogant policy of the United States & United Kingdom imperium, instead of criticizing and renouncing his immediate predecessors policies on these matters.

It is vastly more difficult for him to reverse those stupid and dangerous policies now, after he had announced them, and to back America down from them peaceably, than it would have been if he had not entered the White House in the way that he did, as a continuation of George W. Bush and of Barack Obama and of Donald Trumps policies on these matters. He has been continuing down their road to World War III.

His immediate predecessors were building toward World War III, and he chose to build more toward that War, but Mercouris seems to me to be expecting that Joe Biden will discontinue that road now, after Bidens having committed himself toward building that way even more than his immediate predecessors did.

The road to WWIII is long, and Biden, by now, should recognize that we are nearing the end of that road, which would be the inevitable annihilationist destination of the road that the United States has been taking.

At this point, either Iran will, yet again, have to yield-up its sovereignty (basically return to being an American colony, as it was between 1953 and 1979)), or Russia will have to yield-up its sovereignty (which it never did yield), or China will have to yield-up its sovereignty (which it formerly had done when Britain grabbed it), or else the United States will have to stop demanding them to yield up their sovereignty.

Why has Biden chosen this dead-end???

The reason (besides his stupidity) is obvious: The only alternative for him has been and is for the United States Government to face courageously and honestly in front of the entire world, that its existing policies on each one of these matters is imperialistic and alien to what had been the plan and the intent of United States President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, his plan to end all imperialisms and replace them by the first global democratic federation of nations, by means of the sole possessor of strategic weaponry being the United Nations, the organization which FDR himself invented, created and named, but which his immediate successor, Harry S. Truman, catastrophically weakened in order to prepare for the U.S. Government itself to take over control of the entire world and dictate to it as the worlds first all-encompassing global empire.

In 1991 when the Soviet Union and its communism and its Warsaw Pact military alliance all ended, it seemed as if Trumans goal of a global United States dictatorship would finally be fulfilled, and that was supposed to be "the end of history." But it was, instead, only Americas intensified war for global dictatorship, and the end of that war will come now, but definitely not on the United States of Americas terms.

Either Joe Biden will, now, proudly take up and continue, the vision of FDR - to end all empires, meaning especially its own, and to transform the United Nations into what FDR had planned it to become, the democratic federation of all nations - or else, there will be global nuclear annihilation.

Clearly, Joe Biden, throughout his life, has been stupid and arrogant, but the question facing him now is whether to continue this, right up to its ugly end, or else to announce, proudly, that he is a decent person and will return America, and the world, to what had been FDRs vision for it.

If he chooses the latter path, then - and this is the only way to do it - America will again take up the banner of freedom and democracy, to the entire world: including nations that it (for whatever reasons, valid or not) disapproves of. And, then, he will win the Nobel Peace Prize, which Obama had won but did only one thing ever to have deserved, which was the JCPOA (which he had not yet even envisioned when he was accepting that entirely unearned Prize).

Whereas Mercouris seemed to me to be optimistic that Joe Biden would do the sane thing, I am not, because Joe Biden has given no indication that he is willing to renounce his, and his immediate predecessors, extremely ugly record, of reaching to grab the entire world.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.