United States And Its Allies Try to Split the World in Two by Eric Zuesse!
(2021-05-17 at 03:26:17 )

United States And Its Allies Try to Split the World in Two by Eric Zuesse!

America is using its post-WWII position of being the worlds hegemon, so as to compel every other nation either to join them (as a banana republic or vassal nation) or else to become their enemy by destroying them.

Americas response to the increasing economic success of China and other nations that until recent decades were impoverished former colonies is to organize its own allies - especially the English-speaking countries - to become a totally separate global economic trading and military alliance standing against that "third world" - and thereby force all non-aligned nations to have to either choose to be allied with the United States or else become conquered by the United States and its allies.

It is "Us," or "Them," all the way. The top "enemies" (the "Them") are the same countries that the United States of America and its allies were against during the anti-communist Cold War, Russia and China, even though Russia is no longer communist, and China has become a mixture between communism and capitalism.

The United States of America has on its side Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, UAE, and all four of the fascist nations during World War II: Germany, Japan, Italy, and Spain - as well as many other nations.

Russia and China were both allies of the United States during the war against Hitler and his allies, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt had to fight against considerable American support for the fascist powers (overwhelmingly coming from Republicans) during the years before Japans Pearl Harbor attack on 7 December 1941.

(In fact, on 23 November 1937, Hitlers agents Kurt von Tippleskirch and Manfred von Killinger, two Barons, were secretly negotiating with top Republicans - including the racist Irenee du Pont - what would have been the Duponts second coup-attempt against FDR, but neither attempt succeeded.)

As soon as Harry S. Truman (whom the Democratic Partys billionaires chose to be FDRs VP in 1944) became President on FDRs death on 12 April 1945, the alliance with the Soviet Union ended, and the Cold War gelled in Trumans mind on 25 July 1945 because of advice from General Dwight Eisenhower, whom Truman practically worshipped.

On 19 June 1945, Mr. Truman wrote to his wife, Bess, "He has done a whale of a job. They are running him for President, which is O.K. with me. I would turn it over to him now if I could." And, on 25 July 1945, Ike told Mr. Truman that either the Soviet Union would conquer the world or else America would - and this apparently convinced Mr. Truman to go for global empire and to conquer the Soviet Union.

The United States of Americas increasingly used method for conquest is the method that was first done against Iraq starting in 1991: international sanctions, followed by coup-attempts that, if unsuccessful, are then followed by an outright military invasion - with or without United Nations approval.

More recently, this stepwise method (sanctions, failed coup, then invasion) is being used against Syria, but America no longer applies its own troops for its invasions, and instead uses hired proxy-forces (mercenaries), such as, in Syria, jihadists who are hired from around the world and paid for by the Sauds, and also uses separatist Kurds are hired who have long wanted to break away from Iraq, Syria, and Turkey in order to establish their own Kurdistan nation, and who are controlled more directly from Washington,D.C. (since the Sauds do not control Kurdish forces). Americas troops in Syria train and arm (usually with money being supplied by the royal families of Saudi Arabia and Qatar) the jihadists (who are Al Qaeda-affiliated) and the Kurds.

Right now, the United States of America is using its post-WWII position of being the worlds hegemon or globally dominant nation, so as to, basically, compel every other nation either to join them (as a banana republic or vassal nation) or else to become their enemy by destroying them, as Washington,D.C. and its allies have done to Syrians, Yemenis, Palestinians, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, Bolivians, Ecuadorans, and, before that, Hondurans, Guatemalans, El Salvadorans, Argentinians, Chileans, Iranians, and many others in what Washington,D.C. calls "The Free World."

Ideology is no longer the excuse. Now the excuses are "democracy," "human rights," "fighting against corruption," and, of course "national defense" (which likewise was Hitlers main excuse).

In other words: the United States of America is trying to do everything it can to avoid becoming downgraded to become the worlds #2 nation, in terms of power. Americas billionaires are behind this; Americas Government is controlled by them.

The best single statement of the United States of Americas position is the speech that Barack Obama gave to the graduating cadets at West Point Military Academy on 28 May 2014, saying:

The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come. - Russias aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while Chinas economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums. - It will be your generations task to respond to this new world.

The United States of America "responds" to the rising power of nations that formerly had been colonies, by means of offering them this choice: Join with us, or else be destroyed.

As the United States Establishment presents and promotes this, it is "justified" because only America is "indispensable": all other nations are "dispensable."

(Hitler, too, felt that way about all other nations - and most Germans endorsed that supremacism then, just like most Americans support it today.)

FDR had planned a non-fascist future for the world, but then he died and (because of whom FDRs successor was) we got a fascist future, instead, and that is what we have. Mussolini called fascism "corporationism." And the United States of America is more and more corporationist every decade that passes.

Under the bigoted Hindu-nationalist Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India is now clearly part of the United States-United Kingdom-led alliance. On 4 March 2021, Munira Lokhandwala headlined "Google Invests Billions in India as Modi and Allies Stage Corporate Takeover of Agriculture" and reported that

In particular, Googles multi-billion dollar investment in the telecommunications company owned by oil and gas billionaire Mukesh Ambani shows how United States Big Tech will stop at nothing to make a bigger profit, even if this includes legitimizing a key supporter of the authoritarian-leaning government that is now a target of mass revolt. Ambani is Indias richest man and a strong corporate ally to BJP leadership, perceived by many as a major beneficiary of the hated agricultural reforms.

In September 2020, the Indian Parliament approved the Indian Agriculture Acts of 2020, also known as the "Farm Bills." In response, Indian farmers who opposed these bills launched one of the largest protests and series of cross-sectoral strikes that the world has ever seen.

It is estimated that over 250 million people have participated in protests against the passage of these bills that Indian farmers see as another phase in the continued attack on their livelihoods and an attempt to deregulate the farming industry to allow for greater private-sector control of food distribution. These changes would favor large corporations like Ambanis Reliance Industries, who would thrive under the free market conditions that these Farm Bills would create.

India, in the Rhodesist plan, would be a major counter-weight to China.

Japan is another. On 23 April 2021, Craig Mark bannered "From Five Eyes To Six? Japans Push To Join The Wests Intelligence Alliance", and he reported that

As tensions with China continue to grow, Japan is making moves to join the "Five Eyes" intelligence-sharing alliance. This week, Japans ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, told The Sydney Morning Herald he was "optimistic" about his country coming on board. "[I] would like to see this idea become reality in the near future."

This comes as New Zealand voices its concerns over using the Five Eyes process to pressure China.

What is this spy alliance? And what are the benefits and risks to bringing Japan on board?

What is the Five Eyes?

Beginning as an intelligence exchange agreement between the United States and United Kingdom in 1943, it formally became the UKUSA Agreement in 1946. The agreement then extended to Canada in 1948, and Australia and New Zealand in 1956.

United Kingdom has gotten Japans Ambassador to Australia to assist Australia to pressure progressive New Zealand to remain in the Rhodesist alliance and thereby help to bring Japan into the Rhodesist core as being the first-ever non-English-speaking country to be admitted into the Rhodes-core (and thereby turn the "Five Eyes" into six).

That would achieve what David Rockefeller and his sidekick Zbig Brzezinski (who was a member of Polands nobility) had been attempting to do by means of their Trilateral Commission, which was intended to expand beyond the Bilderberg group of NATO countries so as to include also Japan.

On 30 April 2021, the geostrategic analyst Alexander Mercouris headlined a video "Blinken Goes To Ukraine With A Tough Message For Zelensky" and explained that because Mr. Putin recently established "red lines" that would provoke a direct military conflict between Russia and the United States if violated by the United States, President Biden has refocused Americas top target to be conquered as being no longer Russia but instead now China. Mercouris says that Ukraines United States-stooge President Volodmyr Zelensky will probably now be forced to stop threatening to invade the breakaway formerly Ukrainian Donbas region.

However, whereas the United States aristocracys main medium-term objective is to retain control over Ukraine so as to become enabled to blitz-launch missiles from there to eliminate Moscows ability to retaliate against America’s first-strike hit (the United States alliances updated version of the Nazis Operation Barbarossa), the United Kingdoms main medium-term objective is for the United States-United Kingdom-Saud-Qatar alliance to arm and train jihadists and separatist Kurds to conquer Syria so that the Sauds will control that country. The long-term objective, both of the United States of Americas and United Kingdoms aristocrats, is their shared dictatorship over all nations.

On 30 April 2021, the international investigative journalist Finian Cunningham interviewed at Strategic Culture the former United Kingdom Ambassador to Syria, the astoundingly courageous Peter Ford, and headlined "Syria Regime Change Still on Western Agenda - Ex-Ambassador Peter Ford". This whistleblowing former United Kingdom Ambassador opened his comments by saying:

The Western powers are like dogs with an old bone on the subject of alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria. There is no meat on it but they continue to gnaw away. Why? Because the trope that "Mr. Assad gasses his own people" has become a cornerstone of the whole Western propaganda narrative on Syria. Without it, justifying the cruel economic war on Syria, largely through sanctions, would be harder to justify. And with military efforts at regime change having failed, economic warfare is now the last hope for the Western powers of destabilizing Syria enough to topple the government. For this strategy to work the Western powers are more than ready to undermine the credibility of the OPCW by abusing their ability to manipulate it in the Syrian context.

The interview closed with:

Question: Finally, Syria is holding presidential elections on May 26 in which incumbent Bashar al-Assad is running for re-election. The Western powers disparage Syria as an "undemocratic regime". How do you view Syrias polity? Is Mr. Assad likely to win re-election?

Peter Ford: Of course Mr. Assad will win and of course the Western powers will try to disparage his victory. But I can state with certainty that if you could offer the Conservative party in Britain a guarantee of achieving in the next general election anything anywhere near Mr. Assads genuine level of support, albeit some of it reluctant from a war-weary people, the Tories would bite your hand off for such an electoral gain. Much of the current Western propaganda effort against Syria is geared at trying to spoil Mr. Assads victory and deny it legitimacy. But inside Syria itself, the people will see the election as setting the seal on 10 years of struggle, and Mr. Assad will emerge strengthened as he faces the next phase in the Western war on Syria.

Furthermore, just the same as the United States and their allies were funding, training, and arming jihadists (technically called "Salafist Muslims") in order to bring about regime-change in Syria, they are doing the very same thing in order to bring about regime-change in China - in that instance by propagandizing "human rights" for Uyghur Chinese who have been indoctrinated with the Sauds extremist-Sunni variant of the Islamic faith (Salafism). (Many of those Salafists, because of their Turkic culture, have recently become more favorable to Turkey than to Saudi Arabia, and therefore on 18 July 2019, Reuters headlined "Saudi Arabia defends letter backing Chinas Xinjiang policy", and reported that the Sauds "defended signing a letter along with 36 other countries in support of Chinas policies in its western region of Xinjiang, where the United Nations says at least 1 million ethnic Uighurs and other Muslims have been detained."

The United States and United Kingdom were now backing pro-Turkish jihadists, instead of pro-Saudi ones. Turkey is a NATO nation; and, so, the Rhodesists do not care which brand of jihad they are backing in order to break up, or bring regime-change to, China.)

So, even if the United States regime might be placing Ukraine onto the back burner, the United Kingdom regime, apparently, is unwilling to place the conquest of Syria onto its back burner. And, for both American billionaires and United Kingdom billionaires, China is unrelentingly in the gunsights of both aristocracies, to conquer. In fact, on 10 April 2021, Strategic Culture issued an editorial, "Ukraine, Taiwan.. Two-Prong United States Aggression Toward Russia, China", which noted:

President Biden is advancing the same policy under the previous Donald Trump and Barack Obama administrations of military buildup near Chinas territory. This week saw the fourth United States guided-missile destroyer passing through the Taiwan Strait since President Biden took office.

That narrow sea separates the breakaway island from Chinas mainland. Beijing has sovereign territorial claim to Taiwan which is recognized by the vast majority of nations, including up until recently the United States under its so-called "One China” policy. Joe Biden, like his predecessor Donald Trump, is deliberately eroding the One China policy by sending delegates to the island on official visits, increasing weapons sales and most provocatively making public declarations that the United States will "defend" Taiwan in the event of "an invasion" by Chinese forces.

Similar to the Ukraine, the Biden administrations rhetoric and conduct is serving to fuel an ever-more provocative stance by the Taiwanese leaders. This week, a senior official warned that the islands forces would shoot down Chinese aircraft that approach the territory. This is nothing but a flagrant challenge to Chinas territorial integrity and sovereignty. As in the case of the Ukraine and Russia, it is Washington,D.C.s words and actions that are inflaming the tensions between Taiwan and China. Yet the Americans accuse others of "aggression" and claim to be providing "defense".

The only entity that could possibly stop all this would be the United States-created European Union. Either they will turn against their creator, and join with Russia and China against the United States and United Kingdom (which would put an end to the Rhodesist teams insanity), or there will be World War III (though probably not in the near-term future), in which the United States regime will blitz-nuclear attack Russia, though that would destroy the planet.

If the EU does break away from the United States, then it will also be able to relocate the United Nations out of NYC to Europe and reform the United Nations in what had been its inventors, FDRs, intention, that the United Nations become the democratic global federation of nations controlling all nuclear and other geostrategic weapons and forces, and that serves as the sole and authoritative executive, legislative, and judicial, authority for all international-relations issues throughout the world, the democratic federal world government. That is what Mr. Truman and Mr. Churchill prevented, and what would produce a world that will have no future world wars, no future wars between empires, because there would no longer be any empires, nor any imperialism.

Either there will be FDRs intention, or there will be nuclear annihilation.

The EU will decide.

For the EU to impose FDRs intention would be for the EU to turn against its creator, which was Mr. Truman and all subsequent United States Presidents (and their Congresses, which likewise have been controlled by Americas billionaires).

However, a likelier alternative would be for some nations to do as the United Kingdom did and break away from the EU, but for them to do it as UK did not, to realign themselves with Russia, China, and Iran, and away from the U.S.

That, too, might prevent WWIII and enable the United Nations to be reformed as FDR had been intending it to be: as the global democratic federal republic and sole source and judge and enforcer of international laws - the post-imperialist world, which FDR had planned for. If FDRs plan does not happen, then WWIII will happen, and this was the reason why he had been planning the United Nations as he did.

But as soon as he died, on 12 April 1945, the billionaires agents worked on Mr. Truman, who finally, on 25 July 1945 (based on General Eisenhowers advice), decided to go for Americas global conquest; and, so, the ceaseless string of subversions, coups, and invasions, by the United States (the permanent-warfare state), started. The first coup was 1948 in Thailand, in order to install rulers who would let the OSS-CIA skim from the international narcotics traffic so as to supply the needed off-the-books funding for the Central Intelligence Agencys Special Operations.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.