US Again Bombs Nations On Other Side Of The World In "Self-Defense" by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2021-06-29 at 00:26:20 )

US Again Bombs Nations On Other Side Of The World In "Self-Defense" by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

The United States is again illegally bombing nations on the other side of the planet which it has invaded and occupied and branded this murderous aggression as "defensive".

"At President Bidens direction, United States military forces earlier this evening conducted defensive precision airstrikes against facilities used by Iran-backed militia groups in the Iraq-Syria border region," reads a statement by Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby. "The targets were selected because these facilities are utilized by Iran-backed militias that are engaged in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attacks against United States personnel and facilities in Iraq. Specifically, the United States strikes targeted operational and weapons storage facilities at two locations in Syria and one location in Iraq, both of which lie close to the border between those countries."

Even more absurd than the fact that we are all still pretending this clearly dementia-addled president is "directing" anything is the claim that these actions were "defensive" in nature.

It is not possible for occupying invaders to be acting defensively in the nations they are occupying an invading; United States troops are only in Iraq by way of an illegal 2003 invasion, a bogus 2014 re-entry, and a refusal to leave at the Iraqi governments request last year, and they are in Syria illegally and without the permission of the Syrian government.

They can therefore only ever be aggressors; they cannot be acting defensively.

It is like if you broke into your neighbors house to rob him, killed him when he tried to stop you, and then claimed self-defense because you consider his home your property. Only in the United States of American exceptionalist alternate universe is this considered normal and acceptable.

The only actual defensive action that the United States could legitimately take to protect troops in Iraq and Syria would be to remove United States troops from Iraq and Syria.

There is no legal authorization for United States troops to be in Iraq or Syria. Bring them home and stop bombing people under the guise of self-defense.-Justin Amash (justinamash) June 28, 2021

As former United States representative Justin Amash pointed out following the bombing, there is no actual legal authorization for United States troops to be in Iraq or Syria in the first place. As journalist Glenn Greenwald highlighted, there is also no legal basis for bombings on the military personnel in those nations either, no matter how "Iranian-backed" they are.

"I know it is boring to note this but President Biden has no legal authorization to bomb "Iranian-backed" targets in Syria and Iraq, making it illegal," Mr. Greenwald tweeted, adding, "But Barack Obama bombed Libya after the House voted against doing so, and few of the Sacred Rule Of Law mavens cared."

The legal justification the Biden administration is using for this airstrike is the same bogus one it used for its airstrikes in Syria this past February: not counter-terrorism, but an extremely weird and broad interpretation of Article II of the United States Constitution.

"As a matter of international law, the United States acted pursuant to its right of self-defense," Kirby writes in the aforementioned statement. "The strikes were both necessary to address the threat and appropriately limited in scope. As a matter of domestic law, the President took this action pursuant to his Article II authority to protect United States personnel in Iraq."

This claim the Executive Branch has been leaning on lately, that Article II permits unilateral acts of war on the other side of the planet without congressional approval, has come under criticism from legal scholars across the United States political spectrum. As Tess Bridgeman wrote for Just Security following President Bidens February airstrikes:

"With former President Donald Trumps term in office over, it is time to evaluate his war powers legacy and where it leaves the Biden administration as it begins to grapple with how and when to use force abroad in the absence of congressional authorization. The picture that emerges from Donald Trumps war powers reporting to Congress is one of an extraordinarily broad vision of the presidents authority to use force abroad without congressional authorization, and of a willingness to exploit loopholes in reporting requirements in a way that obscures information on the use of force from the public."

A willingness to exploit loopholes is right. But as long as acts of mass military violence serve as the glue which holds a globe-spanning empire together, death finds a way.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".