Afghanistan: If Biden Will Not Sign Off Air Strikes Against the Taliban, Then the Pundits Might Be Right About Kabul Falling Soon by Martin Jay!
(2021-08-14 at 19:28:22 )

Afghanistan: If Biden Will Not Sign Off Air Strikes Against the Taliban, Then the Pundits Might Be Right About Kabul Falling Soon by Martin Jay!

But he might just. The United States president is hesitating and he must be considering the scenario of reinstating the Taliban in Kabul with Russia and Iran helping it with its governance this time around.

Many might argue that at the heart of good journalism lies the ability to ask difficult, if not obvious questions to our leaders. Remarkably, with Joe Bidens numerous press conferences on the subject of Afghanistan and Americas pullout of its troops, not one American journalist was able to ask the simplest question of Biden, which is the only real issue which matters. Will the United States support the Afghan government with an air campaign against the advancing Taliban? This is a deal breaker and really will tell us if all of the so-callled Afghanistan experts bases in various western capitals, are correct in their erroneous prediction of Kabul falling "within weeks".

In recent weeks President Biden has tipped off journalists that he would pull out United States troops from Iraq and Syria. In reality, he did neither, anxious that this will give a boost to Iran and its proxies during what is laughingly still a period of negotiations with Iran over the JCPOA.

President Biden has no real foreign policy blueprint for the region. And so this makes his last minute decisions more acceptable and almost the norm with most experts. But in the case of Afghanistan, President Biden cannot afford to dither as he has in Iraq and Syria. The stakes are just too high.

As Afghanistans regional capitals fall quicker than expected to the Taliban, we should look at this advance in context.

There is not much of a fight in most cases as the United States program of training the Afghan army shows itself to be the unprecedented failure that it is with most regular army units fleeing their posts rather than fight. This is also to do with a governance, which the United States could have played a bigger role in. Most soldiers have very low morale and have no confidence in the Afghan elite to make the right decisions quickly, in a country which some have called the most corrupt in the world.

But as most pundits say the end of the Afghans government control is in sight, it may well be that Kabul and the government can hold out, if the United States and its allies support the Afghan airforce with their campaign which is starting to have an impact. The battle with the Taliban will be from the air and the 53 appache helicopters which the United States sold the Afghan government in 2017 will be put to good use in the battle for Kabul. But they will not be enough.

President Biden is about to write the history books which could tarnish Americas foreign policy mantra for generations to come. Will he let Kabul fall to the Taliban and just stand back and harp on about Afghans having to fight when this extremist group will make such a colossal mockery of United States intervention in a twenty year operation which resulted in achieving exactly the opposite that it set out to achieve.

Yes, of course a security vaccum is already a huge problem, which means that the present tiny groups ISIL and Al Qaeda, might expand with the easy influx of overseas jihadists - as they find it easy to operate their and might even find patrons for their dirty work (perhaps even from the United States itself, to follow the trend of Syria and Obamas "dirty dozen" of ho-ho-ho "moderate" rebels which in fact were Al Qaeda and Al Nusra terror groups.

President Biden is in a quandary though. Probably he is conscious of how helping the Afghan government might push the Taliban to ask for more support from regional players who could benefit from the Taliban being both in power and carrying out a daily war with the United States.

But how does the United States bomb the Taliban when it has just signed a peace deal with it in 2020 in Doha?

The tough decision from President Biden might be whether to bankroll the Afghan government and extend the arms procurement credit line to its air force. But even in this scenario, if will speed up a process of dialogue both with Iran and Russia who both are in a position to help its airforce.

Russia has strategic interests in its central asia "stans" which it does not want to receive more jihadists with a spill over in the future. Iran, for its part, is looking for a convenient proxy war zone to hit the United States, outside of the Straits of Hormuz, where it can feed its new appetite for anti American narrative which the new hardline President is championing. For the moment both Tehran and Moscow are playing a waiting game but it would be hard to imagine the Taliban coming back into power without either of these two countries playing a support role of some sort.

The real worry is morale in the Afghan army. It is hard to see how President Ghani can change this situation favourably in such a short space of time. He may well have more luck with anti Taliban militias scattered around the country who have signalled they are ready to work more closely with the government. But they need to "buddy up" with Americas allies in the region, such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE, before it is too late. And there really is not too much time left.

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.