The Silence of CIA Media Assets on the JFK Cover-Up by Jacob G. Hornberger
(2021-11-02 at 00:37:56 )

The Silence of CIA Media Assets on the JFK Cover-Up by Jacob G. Hornberger

One of the funniest aspects of President Bidens decision to continue the Central Intelligence Agencys cover-up of the national-security establishments regime-change operation on November 22, 1963, has been the silent reaction of the mainstream media. Ordinarily, the CIAs journalistic assets would have gone into action by now, publishing editorials and op-eds supporting Joe Bidens decision to grant the CIAs demand for continued secrecy on grounds of "national security."

What is the reason for the silence???

I suspect that despite their extreme loyalty to the CIA, they are all too embarrassed to make such a ludicrous argument. Better to remain silent and hope the whole controversy just goes away.

By the time of Oliver Stones movie JFK in 1991, the CIA and the rest of the United States national-security establishment had kept their assassination-related records secret for some 30 years. They said that "national security" required such secrecy, notwithstanding their claim that a lone-nut communist former U.S. Marine had killed President Kennedy.

People did not buy it.

Mr. Stones movie induced a massive public outcry against continued secrecy. In one of those rare instances in which the United States Congress is forced by public pressure to act against the wishes of the Pentagon and the CIA, Congress enacted the JFK Records Act of 1992, which forced the national-security establishment to disclose their long-secret assassination-related records.

To enforce the law, Congress called the Assassination Records Review Board into existence. From 1993 to 1998, the ARRB forced the release of thousands of long secret records, oftentimes over the vehement objections of the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency.

As a result of those disclosures in the 1990s, the United States did not fall into the ocean. The communists did not take control over the United States. Cuba did not invade Miami. The dominoes did not fall in Southeast Asia.

What did happen, however, is that the ARRB lifted the shroud of secrecy that the national-security establishment had placed over the autopsy that it had conducted on the body of President Kennedy a few hours after the assassination. The records revealed one reason why the military and the CIA had wanted to keep their assassination-related records secret forever: The autopsy they conducted was fraudulent to the core.

As I have repeatedly emphasized, there is no innocent explanation for a fraudulent autopsy, especially given that the scheme was launched at Parkland Hospital immediately after John F. Kennedy was declared dead. See my two books The Kennedy Autopsy and The Kennedy Autopsy 2. Also see Douglas Hornes excellent video presentation at our conference last spring on the Kennedy assassination as well as his watershed five-volume book Inside the Assassination Records Review Board.

Unfortunately, however, there was a flaw in the law. The law gave the national-security establishment another 25 years of secrecy if the release of certain records posed "an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure."

The ARRB went out of existence in 1998 and, therefore, it was not around to enforce the law when that 25-year deadline materialized in 2017 during the Donald Trump administration. Trump surrendered to the CIAs demand for continued secrecy and pushed the secrecy deadline into 2021.

Not surprisingly, President Biden has also now surrendered to the CIAs demand for continued secrecy. Like Trump, he says that the release of the records will threaten "national security" by posing "an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure."

Will the remaining records contain a "smoking gun" confession of the national-security establishments regime change on November 22, 1963. Of course not. No one would be so stupid as to put such a confession in writing and then turn it over to the National Archives.

But the records undoubtedly contain incriminating pieces of the puzzle that will further fill out the regime-change mosaic, just as the ARRBs forced disclosure of the medical evidence in the 1990s established the existence of a fraudulent autopsy.

Let me give you another example of this phenomenon. In 2017, a few of the secret records that were released under Donald Trump disclosed a secret memorandum from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover that was dated November 24, 1963, the day that Jack Ruby assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald. The memo stated: "The thing I am concerned about, and so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Mr. Oswald is the real assassin."

Oswald was referring to U.S. Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, who himself issued a memorandum to presidential aide Bill Boyers on November 25, 1963, stating, "The public must be satisfied that Mr. Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial."

Three questions naturally arise:

1. How in the world could two of the nations top law-enforcement officers be certain that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated the president within just two or three days of the assassination, especially given that Mr. Oswald was not only proclaiming his innocence but also claiming he was being framed for the crime??

2. Even if Mr. Oswald was involved in the crime, how in the world could anyone be certain that he did not have confederates without weeks or even months of investigation, especially since the Dallas treating physicians had said that John F.Kennedys throat wound was an entry wound, which necessarily meant a shot having been fired from the presidents front?

3. How would the release of Mr. Hoovers memo back in the 1990s possibly have threatened "national security" or possibly posed "an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure"??

It could not have, which meant that the national-security establishment lied to the ARRB when they used that excuse to keep the Hoover memo secret.

Obviously, the Hoover memo is not a confession of criminal wrongdoing. But it is another piece of the assassination puzzle that shows how United States national-security state officials were committed to shutting down the investigation into the presidents assassination immediately.

Another funny part of President Bidens decision to extend the cover-up has been the reaction of people who continue to adhere to the lone-nut theory of the assassination. What has been their reaction??

It has been the same as that of the CIAs assets in the mainstream press. Silence!!!

Would you not expect the lone-nut theorists to be screaming to the CIA: "Release the records so that everyone will know that you’ are innocent and that you are not covering up your own criminal wrongdoing!!

Do not leave us lone-nut theorists in a lurch!"

Of course, there is another possible reason for silence among the CIAs media assets and its lone-nut theorist supporters: They are nervous about what those long-secret records will reveal. And they are silently hoping the records never see the light of day.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Libertarian Website!!