U.S. Police Unions Starting to Ask: Why Does the ACLU "Defend the Indefensible"? by Robert Bridge
(2021-12-19 at 15:56:07 )

U.S. Police Unions Starting to Ask: Why Does the ACLU "Defend the Indefensible"? by Robert Bridge

With the introduction of ACLU Watch, more people can better understand that a robust police presence is not the true source of the United States of Americas crime problem, Robert Bridge writes.

Law enforcement officials have begun a watch beat of sorts against the American Civil Liberties Union, whose support of justice reform has translated into more criminals roaming the streets as police officers lose their jobs.

A number of liberal activists, armed with the most altruistic intentions, of course, are busy remaking the United States of America into a liberal bastion of utopian thinking, where the Cultural Marxists have put down the stakes on their zany new world, which promises to go international. But if surging gun sales in the Golden State are any indication, the progressives are off to a disastrous start.

"I have always been anti-gun," Debbie Mizrahie of Beverly Hills said, as quoted by Michael Shellenberger in the New York Post. "But I am right now in the process of getting myself shooting lessons because I now understand that there may be a need for me to know how to defend myself and my family. We are living in fear."

And it is not difficult to understand why.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigations annual Uniform Crime Report released in September, the nation experienced a 30 percent increase in murder in 2020, the biggest annual jump since the bureau began tracking crime statistics 60 years ago. That record comes attached with a footnote that the mainstream media is at tremendous pains to ignore: this year, of the 12 major United States cities that broke annual homicide records, every one of them - from Rochester, New York to Baton Rouge, Louisiana - are run by Democrats. Or more specifically, by organizations that wield tremendous power and influence over the Democratic Party.

The one obvious name that always surfaces when speaking about the "criminal reform" initiatives well underway in liberal-run cities is the billionaire philanthropist, George Soros.

As the Democratic Partys most prolific benefactor, Mr. Soros has filled the campaign coffers of various District Attorney races. For example, last year, amid the George Floyd Black Lives Matter protests, Mr. Soros donated $2 million to a PAC that backed Kim Foxx, who went on to become the States Attorney for Cook County, Chicago, where murder is now at its highest rate in almost 30 years. In keeping in line with woke ideology, which blames the "oppressive white system" for the behavior of felons, Ms Foxx immediately began to defer many prosecutions while reducing bail and sentencing guidelines for hardened criminals.

As it turns out, however, Mr. Soros is in good company, particularly with the ACLU, which is also working overtime defending the worst elements of society, while depriving victims of their rights. For a long time, this watchdog group was doing all the watching, imposing its warped worldview on communities around the nation. That looks set to change, however, after a coalition of seven police unions from three states put together a website to track exactly what the ACLU has been up to.

Sponsored by the San José Police Officers Association, San Francisco Police Officers Association, Los Angeles Police Protective League, Seattle Police Officers Guild, San Diego Police Officers Association, Sacramento Police Officers Association and the Las Vegas Police Protective Association, ACLU Watch says it is "dedicated to fighting for victims rights, accountability for criminals, and exposing those that defend the indefensible."

One of the ACLUs pet projects involves bail payments, the site disclosed, which have been dramatically reduced in the name of "combatting racism and economic inequality." The initiative allows the convicted to put up just 10% of an already drastically reduced bond requirement, which has led to all of the predictably tragic consequences.

As just one example, James McClendon, 45, who police said had been in and out of jail dozens of times, was suspected in June of committing a double shooting that left a man dead and a woman injured in Atlanta. Yet the judge in his trial set bail at just $50,000, and McClendon was free to walk three weeks later.

"Most of the individuals were getting out within a couple of days and the bond was generally low," Maj. William Ricker told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "On average, $28,000 was the general bond amount. Then, of course, you talk about being able to just pay 10%, that is a significantly small amount for people to be back out on the streets."

If bail reform does not keep criminals on the street, then Proposition 47 certainly will, at least in California. Under the updated ruling, shoplifting charges on the theft of merchandise $950 or less was reduced from a felony to misdemeanor. Then-Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, together with the ACLU were supporters of the legislation.

"Prop. 47 reduces the barriers that many people with a low-level, non-violent felony conviction face to becoming stable and productive citizens, such as a lack of employment, housing and access to assistance programs and professional trades," the ACLU wrote in support of the legislation back in 2014.

But it is not just the thieves and murderers that the ACLU seems determined to defend, but kiddie flashers as well. Back in 2018, The Ohio House voted 80-0 for a bill that increases penalties for people who expose themselves to children. As Tier 1 sex offenders, such individuals are forbidden from living within 1,000 feet of a day care center or school. Such a rule seemed, somehow, incomprehensible to the New York-based watchdog.

"There is no evidence these policies and laws keep people safer or reduce recidivism," said Gary Daniels of the ACLU of Ohio in written testimony. "Exiling sex offenders and making it more difficult to find housing and unemployment increase the chances they will commit another offense," he said, as though employment has ever stopped perverts before.

Since the murder of George Floyd, these "crime reform" endorsements by the ACLU, which negatively affects two groups of people - the victims of crime, and the police officers who were hired specifically to "preserve the peace" - have been moving ahead full steam. Yet now, with the introduction of ACLU Watch, more people can better understand that a robust police presence is not the true source of the United States of Americas crime problem.

By coddling criminals, the ACLU has helped to make United States neighborhoods infinitely more dangerous, something which more Americans need to understand.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.