Being This Close To Nuclear War Should Change How We See Things by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2022-03-25 at 00:07:22 )

Being This Close To Nuclear War Should Change How We See Things by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

It is so surreal how we are closer to nuclear war than we have been since the Cuban Missile Crisis, and it is only continuing to escalate, and yet hardly anyone seems to notice and almost everyone is just going about their lives thinking their usual thoughts and having their usual conversations.

Vladimir Putin has put Russias nuclear forces on high alert and has issued threats of nuclear retaliation should western powers try to intervene in Russian military operations in Ukraine. The Biden administrations first Nuclear Posture Review will be out soon and will likely mirror the changes in Russias nuclear posture in some ways. The probability is skyrocketing of a mass extinction event which could easily block out the sun for years and starve everyone to death who is not lucky enough to be killed quickly in the initial inferno.

A recent New York Times article titled "The Smaller Bombs That Could Turn Ukraine Into a Nuclear War Zone" discusses the danger of Russia using a so-called "tactical" or "low-yield" nuke if the war is not going well for Moscow, making the calculation that using one of its much less destructive nuclear weapons might succeed in intimidating its enemies into backing down without resulting in full-blown nuclear war.

An excerpt:

-"It feels horrible to talk about these things," Dr. Kühn said in an interview. "But we have to consider that this is becoming a possibility."

-Washington,D.C. expects more atomic moves from Mr. Putin in the days ahead. Moscow is likely to "increasingly rely on its nuclear deterrent to signal the West and project strength" as the war and its consequences weaken Russia, Lt. Gen. Scott D. Berrier, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday.

A truly sapient life form would read those two paragraphs and immediately say, "Oh well we obviously can not continue along this trajectory anymore. Let us negotiate a ceasefire by whatever means necessary and move toward detente as swiftly as possible." But rather than move to de-escalate, all we are seeing is continual escalation with increasingly shrill calls to escalate further.

It is worth noting here that experts have been warning for years that these "low-yield" nuclear weapons pose a horrifying threat to our species because of the risk of somebody making the calculation that they could get away with using them, as we see in this 2019 article by James Carroll titled "The Most Dangerous Weapon Ever Rolls Off the Nuclear Assembly Line". Such warnings just did not get much attention before because they were about the United States manufacturing those weapons and did little to amplify Russia hysteria.

-New from rjsmithnatsec and publicintegrity: A technology retrofit is improving the accuracy and destructive power of the United States nuclear arsenal. It brings new risks as well.-Matt DeRienzo (mattderienzo) October 29, 2021

It is probably also worth noting that the United States has been updating its nuclear arsenal with advancements which make its nuclear-armed rivals more likely to calculate the need for a full-scale nuclear first strike. As R Jeffrey Smith explained last year for The Center for Public Integrity, improvements in the ability to perfectly time a nukes detonation make it much more destructive and therefore capable of destroying underground nuclear weapons, which would necessarily make a government like Russia more likely to launch a preemptive strike in a moment of tension to avoid being disarmed by a United States strike.

Others worry, however, that those leaders - knowing that many of their protected, land-based weapons and associated command posts could not escape destruction - might be more prone to order their use early in a crisis or conflict, simply to ensure they are not destroyed when incoming warheads arrive, promoting a hair-trigger launch policy that could escalate into a general cataclysm.

Physicist James Acton, who co-directs the nuclear policy program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and has written extensively about the need to avert unnecessary conflicts, said that efforts to modernize the nuclear arsenal should be more focused on ensuring the weapons safety, security, and reliability, and less on goosing their accuracy.

"If China or Russia believe in a conflict or a crisis that we are going to attack or destroy their nuclear forces and command posts, that gives them an incentive to use nuclear weapons first, or to threaten their use. They have strong incentives to take steps that would further escalate the crisis and create new dangers," Acton said.

New air- and sea-launched cruise missiles also place Russia on hair-trigger alert, Smith writes:

New air- and sea-launched cruise missiles in particular, [Nuclear Weapons Council chair Andrew Weber] said, are not necessary, and will undermine deterrence because they are stealthy, surprise-attack weapons that will make opponents nervous enough to adopt hair-trigger launch policies. Since they can be deployed with both conventional and nuclear warheads and it is impossible for opponents to tell the difference, their use could cause unintentional escalation from a conventional to a nuclear war.

-Will Humans Be the Next "Freedom Fries" by Ray McGovern-Antiwar.com (Antiwarcom) March 23, 2022

And while everyone is talking about the fear that President Putin may make a calculated decision to initiate a nuclear exchange should he feel backed into a corner, at present the primary risk of nuclear war remains what it has been for about as long as we have had these infernal weapons on our planet: that the explicit understanding in Mutually Assured Destruction will be set into motion by a nuke being discharged by either side due to miscommunication, miscalculation, misunderstanding or malfunction, or some combination of these, amid the chaos and confusion of escalating brinkmanship. Which nearly happened many times during the last cold war.

As Nuclear Age Peace Foundation president David Krieger explained back in 2017:

Nearly 15,000 nuclear weapons are currently under the control of nine countries. Each has a complex system of command and control with many possibilities for error, accident or intentional use.

Error could be the result of human or technological factors, or some combination of human and technological interaction. During the more than seven decades of the Nuclear Age, there have been many accidents and close calls that could have resulted in nuclear disaster. The world narrowly escaped a nuclear war between the United States and Soviet Union during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

Human factors include miscommunications, misinterpretations and psychological issues. Some leaders believe that threatening behavior makes nuclear deterrence more effective, but it could also result in a preventive first-strike launch by the side being threatened. Psychological pathologies among those in control of nuclear weapons could also play a role. Hubris, or extreme arrogance, is another factor of concern.

Technological factors include computer errors that wrongfully show a country is under nuclear attack. Such false warnings have occurred on numerous occasions but, fortunately, human interactions (often against policy and-or orders) have so far kept a false warning from resulting in a mistaken "retaliatory" attack. In times of severe tensions, a technological error could compound the risks, and human actors might decide to initiate a first strike.

As Ray McGovern explains in a new article for Antiwar titled "Will Humans Be the Next "Freedom Fries"?", the early launch detection system Russia relies on for nuclear deterrence is so technologically lagging and prone to error that could easily lead to a nuclear war as the result of a simple mistake. He discusses an instance when Russias early detection equipment falsely reported a potential nuclear attack as recently as 1995, when relations between Washington,D.C. and Moscow were as warm and cozy as they have ever been. It seems reasonable to say that a similar incident would have a good chance of being interpreted and responded to in a very different way should it repeat itself in 2022.

McGovern says that launch-to-target time has shrunk so much with the advancement of technology that there are now probably multiple subordinate commanders out in the field with the authority to launch a nuclear strike:

Here is the thing: the Russians have good reason to be on hair-trigger alert. Their early-warning radar system is so inadequate that there are situations (including those involving innocent rocket launches) under which Russian President Putin would have only a few minutes - if that - to decide whether or not to launch nuclear missiles to destroy the rest of the world - on the suspicion that Russia was under nuclear attack.

"If that"? Yes, launch-to-target time is now so short that it is altogether likely that the authority to launch nuclear weapons is now vested in subordinate commanders "in the field," so to speak. Readers of Daniel Ellsbergs Doomsday Machine are aware of how the United States actually devolved this authority during the days of the first cold war. I, for one, was shocked to learn that. Worse: today the subordinate commanders might be non-commissioned computers.

"United States pundits and strategic experts seem blissfully unaware of how close we all are to being fried in a nuclear strike by Russia," McGovern writes.

For a lot more information on how dangerously close we are getting to the brink, check out former United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritters epic rant toward the end of his recent chat with The Grayzones Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate, where he talks about all the horrible United States government decisions and shredded treaties which have led us from a rare moment of relative nuclear safety to the precarious position we now find ourselves in:

I am always stunned at how, whenever I talk about the way all this brinkmanship is bringing us ever closer to a precipice from which there is no return, people will often tell me "Yeah well if it happens it will be Putins fault for starting it." Like that is in any way a sane response to our plight. People are so confused and compartmentalized about this issue they seriously think "If nuclear war happens it will be Putins fault" is a complete position on this issue.

I always want to shake them and ask them, "If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, would the words "It was Putins fault" give you any comfort? Or would you, perhaps, wish measures had been taken early on to prevent it from getting to this point?"

It is a useful thought experiment that can be applied in many areas, while we sit here on the brink waiting to see what happens.

If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, how good would you feel about the decision not to guarantee Moscow that Ukraine would never receive NATO membership?

If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, would you be able to say you tried everything you could to prevent this from happening?

If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, would you feel okay about how you have been treating the people you care about?

If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, would you feel okay about how you have been spending your time?

If you looked outside right now and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, will you wish you had spent more time at the office? Wish you had participated in more social media drama? Wish you had taken fewer chances? Wish you had loved with less abandon?

The swelling likelihood of imminent armageddon draws everything into focus. Helps clarify your priorities. Helps you figure out how to live your life from moment to moment.

And from where I am sitting this clarity brings with it a sense of responsibility as a human being. A responsibility to really be here now. To truly live our lives with presence and appreciation. To drink deeply of the cup of human experience. Because the only thing worse than everything ending would be if it ended without having been seen and valued while it lasted.

We have control over so very little in this insane little pickle we have found ourselves in. But one thing we can definitely control is whether we are really showing up for however much time we have got left on this amazing blue planet.

"Treasure each moment" is something you hear so often in life that it becomes a cliche and loses all its meaning. But there has never been a better time to take another look at it with fresh eyes and begin putting it into practice.

Treasure each moment, because there might not be very many of them left. This is the moment. This is our moment. If this does wind up being humanitys last scene on this stage, let us at least help make sure we shine as radiantly as possible before the final curtain.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".