Twitter IS "State-Affiliated Media" by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2022-04-09 at 06:10:42 )

Twitter IS "State-Affiliated Media" by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

British politician and broadcaster George Galloway has made headlines in the United Kingdom with his threat to press legal action against Twitter for designating his account "Russia state-affiliated media", a label which will now show up under his name every time he posts anything on the platform.

"Dear TwitterSupport I am not "Russian State Affiliated media"," reads a viral tweet by Mr. Galloway. "I work for NO Russian media. I have 400,000 followers. I am the leader of a British political party and spent nearly 30 years in the British parliament. If you do not remove this designation I will take legal action."

Mr. Galloway argues that while his broadcasts have previously been aired by Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik, because those outlets have been shut down in the United Kingdom by Ofcom and by European Union sanctions he can no longer be platformed by them even if he wants to. If you accept this argument, then it looks like Twitter is essentially using the "state-affiliated media" designation as a marker of who Mr. Galloway is as a person, rather than as a marker of what he actually does.

Dear TwitterSupport I am not "Russian State Affiliated media". I work for NO #Russian media. I have 400,000 followers. I am the leader of a British political party and spent nearly 30 years in the British parliament. If you do not remove this designation I will take legal action.-George Galloway (georgegalloway) April 6, 2022

Regardless of whether you agree with Mr. Galloways argument or not, this all overlooks the innate absurdity of a government-tied social media corporation like Twitter labeling other people "state-affiliated media".

Twitter is state-affiliated media.

It has been working in steadily increasing intimacy with the United States government since the United States empire began pressuring Silicon Valley platforms to regulate content in support of establishment power structures following the 2016 election.

In 2020 Twitter was one of the many Silicon Valley corporations who coordinated directly with United States government agencies to determine what content should be censored in order to "secure" the presidential election.

In 2021 Twitter announced that it was orchestrating mass purges of foreign accounts on the advice of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), which receives funding from many government institutions including the United States State Department.

"ASPI is the propaganda arm of the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States government," veteran Australian diplomat Bruce Haigh told Mintpress News earlier this year. "It is a mouthpiece for the Americans. It is funded by the American government and American arms manufacturers. Why it is allowed to sit at the center of the Australian government when it has so much foreign funding, I do not know. If it were funded by anybody else, it would not be where it is at."

Twitter has also coordinated its mass purges of accounts with a cybersecurity firm called FireEye, which this 2019 Sputnik article by journalist Morgan Artyukhina explains was "founded in 2004 with money from the CIAs venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel."

-[Thread] Twitter is partnering with a crazy, hawkish, United States-govt & arms industry funded think tank to regulate false info online.

-This should be alarming to anyone who cares about truth, free speech or peace, as my new MintPressNews investigation explains:-Alan MacLeod (AlanRMacLeod) January 20, 2022

It has been an established pattern for years that whenever Twitter reports that it has purged thousands of accounts which it suspects of inauthentic behavior on behalf of foreign governments, you know it is never going to be accounts from United States-aligned countries like the United Kingdom, Israel or Australia, but consistently from United States-targeted nations like Russia, China, Venezuela or Iran.

You can choose to believe that is because the United States only aligns with saintly governments who would never dream of engaging in unethical online behavior, but that would be an infantile position which defies all known evidence.

Since the start of the war in Ukraine, Twitter has been aggressively boosting United States narratives about the war by frequently showing users a Twitter Topic without their having subscribed to it which is full of imperial spinmeisters, including The Kyiv Independent with all its shady Central Intelligence Agency-affiliated origins.

Twitter also promotes United States narratives about the war by keeping a "War in Ukraine" section perpetually on the right-hand side of the screen for desktop users, which runs stories that are wildly biased toward the US-NATO-Ukraine alliance.

There was a full day last month where any time I checked Twitter on my laptop I was informed that "Russia continues to strike civilian targets in Kyiv and across Ukraine." The claim that Russia had been "targeting" civilians during that time was dismissed as nonsense shortly thereafter by United States military experts speaking to Newsweek.

This is the message desktop Twitter users are receiving at the top right of their screen. We talk a lot about Silicon Valleys role in facilitating United States government censorship, but we should probably talk a lot more about its role in facilitating United States government propaganda as well.-Caitlin Johnstone (caitoz) March 21, 2022

When the invasion began Twitter also started actively minimizing the number of people who see Russian media content, saying that it is "reducing the contents visibility" and "taking steps to significantly reduce the circulation of this content on Twitter". It also began placing warning labels on all Russia-backed media and delivering a pop-up message informing you that you are committing wrongthink if you try to share or even "like" a post linking to such outlets on the platform.

Twitter also began placing the label "Russia state-affiliated media" on every tweet made by the personal accounts of employees of Russian media platforms, baselessly giving the impression that the dissident opinions tweeted by those accounts are paid Kremlin content and not simply their own legitimate perspectives. This labeling has led to complaints of online harassment as propaganda-addled dupes seek out targets to act out their media-instilled hatred of all things Russian.

As more and more people find themselves branded with the "Russia state-affiliated media" label, Twitter has concurrently announced that it will be hiding the visibility of any account that wears it, announcing on Tuesday that the platform "will not amplify or recommend government accounts belonging to states that limit access to free information and are engaged in armed interstate conflict." Which is a bit rich, considering the fact that the United States does both of those things.

"This means these accounts will not be amplified or recommended to people on Twitter, including across the Home Timeline, Explore, Search, and other places on the service. We will first apply this policy to government accounts belonging to Russia," Twitter said.

This diminished visibility has been verified by people who have been slapped with the "Russia state-affiliated media" label. So you can understand why imperial narrative managers whose job is to quash dissent want that designation applied to as many critics of the United States empire as possible.

-Incredible. It appears every account hit with the "Russian state-affiliated media" label is not only shadow banned from Twitter but banned from appearing in searches by new users-all in the name of protecting free speech and democracy.-Wyatt Reed (wyattreed13) April 5, 2022

If you are curious why the "state-affiliated media" label has not been applied to Twitter accounts associated with government-funded outlets of the United States and its allies like NPR and the BBC, it is because Twitter has explicitly created a loophole to exclude those outlets from such a designation.

"State-financed media organizations with editorial independence, like the BBC in the United Kingdom or NPR in the United States for example, are not defined as state-affiliated media for the purposes of this policy," Twitters rules say.

Which is of course an absurd and arbitrary distinction.

Whether you like George Galloway or not, I think anyone who is familiar with his personality would agree that if anyone ever tried to take away his editorial independence and tell him what he is or is not permitted to say, it would take an entire team of surgeons to remove Mr. Galloways footwear from their personal anatomy. Many people who have worked with Russian media have said they have never been told what to say, and Mr. Galloway is surely one of them.

The audacity of a social media company which works hand-in-glove with the most powerful government on earth to go around branding people "state-affiliated media" is appalling.

Twitter is state-affiliated media.

It is an instrument of imperial narrative control, just like all the other billionaire Silicon Valley megacorporations of immense influence.

President Putin could only dream of having state media that effective!!

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".