Always Opposing The Last War But Not The Current One: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2022-10-23 at 00:35:07 )

Always Opposing The Last War But Not The Current One: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

Those who hate Russia the most are the ones who embody everything they claim to hate about it: they are all pro-war, pro-censorship, pro-propaganda, pro-trolling operations, and support Ukraine in banning political parties and opposition media. They are what they claim to hate.

Meanwhile those of us who oppose those things are told to "move to Russia", even though we are the ones advocating the supposed "western values" they claim to support while they are doing everything they can to undermine them. They should move to Russia.-Caitlin Johnstone (caitoz) October 23, 2022

Western propaganda means people always oppose the last war but not the current war. The United States provoking and sustaining its Ukraine proxy war is no more ethical than its invading of Iraq; it just looks that way due to propaganda. Ukraine is not the good war, it is just the current war.

It is only by the copious amounts of propaganda our civilization is being hammered with that this is not immediately obvious to everyone. In the future (assuming we do not annihilate ourselves first), the propaganda will have cleared from the air enough for people to see clearly and realize that they were lied to!! Again!!

The United States indisputably deliberately provoked this war.

The United States is indisputably keeping this war going.

The United States indisputably benefits from this war while Ukrainians, Russians and Europeans get nothing but suffering from it.

Empire apologists will admit to the latter in rare moments of honesty, as Matthew Yglesias recently did when he wrote the following:

The United States is using up a lot of military equipment in the war, but it is being used for the purpose of destroying Russian military equipment. Since we were already fully committed to an anti-Russian military alliance, this is actually a really good deal for us. Basically, NATO equipment + Ukrainian lives are being traded for Russian equipment + Russian lives, which leaves NATO coming out ahead. That is doubly true because NATO is much richer than Russia, so we win a long-term game of "everyone explode their weapons as fast as they can make them."

Again, though, what makes that really true is that NATO material is killing Russian soldiers, while Russian material is killing Ukrainian soldiers. That is a deal in our favor.

It is easy to oppose the last war. It is hard to oppose current wars as the propaganda machine is shoving them down our throats. Everyone is anti-war until the war propaganda starts.

Phoniest, most PR-intensive proxy war of all time.-Caitlin Johnstone (caitoz) October 22, 2022

The fact that the White House is weighing a national security review of Elon Musks Twitter purchase because he is perceived as having an "increasingly Russia-friendly stance" is an admission that the United States government views large social media platforms as its own propaganda services.

There is no one who can be trusted with the authority to determine what constitutes "disinformation" or "misinformation" on behalf of large numbers of people. This is because we are not impartial omniscient deities but highly fallible, biased humans with our own vested interests.

This fatal logical flaw in the burgeoning business of "fact checking" and "counter-disinformation" is self-evident at a glance, and it becomes even more glaring once you notice that all the major players involved in instituting and normalizing these practices have ties to status quo power.

The idea that someone needs to be in charge of deciding what is true and false on behalf of the rank-and-file citizenry is becoming more and more widely accepted, and it is plainly irrational.

In practice it is nothing other than a call to propagandize the public more aggressively. You might agree with their propaganda. The propagandists might believe they are being totally impartial and objective. But as long as they have any oligarchic or state backing, directly or indirectly, they are necessarily administering propaganda on behalf of the powerful.

Question the assumption that people saying wrong things to each other on the internet is a problem that needs to be fixed. People have always said wrong things to each other. Untruth has always existed. We have managed. It is not a problem we should want the powerful to fix for us.

A regime that points guns at people for wielding cameras is a regime that sees truth as a threat.-Caitlin Johnstone (caitoz) October 21, 2022

Science should be the most collaborative endeavor in the world. Every scientist on earth should be collaborating and communicating. Instead, because of our competition-based models, it is the exact opposite: scientific exploration is divided up into innovators competing against other innovators, corporations competing against other corporations, nations competing against other nations.

If we could see how much we are losing to these competition-based models, how much innovation is going unrealized, how much human thriving is being sacrificed, how we are losing almost all of our brainpower potential to these models, we would fall to our knees and scream with rage.

If science had been a fully collaborative worldwide hive mind endeavor instead of divided and turned against itself for profit and military power, our civilization would be unimaginably more advanced than it is.

This is doubtless. We gave up paradise to make a few bastards rich.

It is not too late to have this, of course. We could still abandon our competition-based models for collaboration-based ones and create paradise on earth together; we have just got to want it badly enough as a species.

A collaboration-based society where everyone gets what they need would not just eliminate the inefficiencies and obstacles created by competition: it would free up the brainpower of our entire species to devote itself to innovation and discovery.

As Stephen J Gould said, "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einsteins brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

Poverty, inequality, the patent system, the need to earn money to survive, corporate competition, corporate secrecy, competition between states, state secrecy, war, militarism; all these drainages leave us with a tiny fraction of our available scientific potential.

Overcoming the existential roadblocks we have set up for ourselves in our near future is going to require a tremendous amount of brilliance, and we will not have access to that brilliance until we become a conscious species and move from competition-based models to collaborative ones.

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".