AP Editor Said She "Can Not Imagine" A United States Intelligence Official Being Wrong by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2022-11-23 at 03:28:45 )

AP Editor Said She "Can Not Imagine" A United States Intelligence Official Being Wrong by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

The Associated Press journalist who reported a United States intelligence officials false claim that Russia had launched missiles at Poland last week has been fired.

As we discussed previously, APs anonymously sourced report which said "A senior United States intelligence official says Russian missiles crossed into NATO member Poland, killing two people" went viral because of the massive implications of direct hot warfare erupting between Russia and the NATO alliance. AP subsequently retracted its story as the mainstream political-media class came to accept that it was in fact a Ukrainian missile that had struck Poland.

APs firing of reporter James LaPorta looks at this time to be the end point of any accountability for the circulation of this extremely dangerous falsehood. AP spokesperson Lauren Easton says no disciplinary action will be taken against the editors who waved the bogus story through, and to this day the public has been kept in the dark about the identity of the United States official who fed such extremely egregious misinformation-disinformation to the public through the mainstream press.

Important that AP accounts for publishing the false claim that Russia fired missiles into Poland. But the much more important task is finding out why an anonymous senior United States intelligence official fed AP that false claim.-Aaron Maté (aaronjmate) November 23, 2022

It is utterly inexcusable for AP to continue to protect the anonymity of a government official who fed them such a profoundly significant falsehood. This did not just affect AP staff, it affected the whole world; we deserve to know what happened and who was responsible, and AP has no business obstructing that knowledge from us.

Ms LaPortas firing looks like this is yet another instance where the least powerful person involved in a debacle is being made to take the fall for it. A powerful intelligence official will suffer no consequences for feeding false information to the press - thereby ensuring that it will happen again - and no disciplinary action will be taken against Ms LaPortas superiors, despite the absolute buffoonery that subsequent reporting has revealed on their part.

In an article titled "Associated Press reporter fired over erroneous story on Russian attack," The Washington Post reports the following (emphasis added):

Internal AP communications viewed by The Post show some confusion and misunderstanding during the preparations of the erroneous report.

Ms LaPorta shared the United States officials tip in an electronic message around 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. An editor immediately asked if AP should issue an alert on his tip, "or would we need confirmation from another source and-or Poland?"

After further discussion, a second editor said she "would vote" for publishing an alert, adding, "I can not imagine a United States intelligence official would be wrong on this."

The AP fired the reporter but not the editor who, apparently, will literally believe and publish anything a United States intelligence official tells her.- derek davison (dwdavison) November 22, 2022

"I can not imagine a United States intelligence official would be wrong on this."

Can you imagine not being able to imagine a United States intelligence official being wrong? This would be an unacceptable position for any educated adult to hold, much less a journalist, still less an editor, and still less an editor of one of the most influential news agencies on earth.

These are the people who publish the news reports we read to find out what is happening in the world. This is the baby-brained level of thinking these people are serving the public interest with.

Antiwar commentator Daniel Larison writes the following of the AP editors shocking quote:

Skepticism about official claims should always be the watchword for journalists and analysts. These are claims that need more scrutiny than usual rather than less. If you can not imagine that an intelligence official could get something important wrong, whether by accident or on purpose, you are taking far too many things for granted that need to be questioned and checked out first.

Intelligence officials of many governments feed information to journalists and have done so practically ever since there was a popular press to feed information to, and that information certainly should not be trusted just because an official source hands it over. It is also always possible for intelligence officials to just get things wrong, whether it is because they are relying on faulty information or because they were too hasty in reaching conclusions about what they think they know.

Whether the APs source was feeding them a line or was simply mistaken, a claim as provocative and serious as this one should have been checked out much more thoroughly before it got anywhere near publication. The AP report in this case seems to have been a combination of a story that was "too good to check" and a culture of deference to official sources in which the editors did not feel compelled to make the effort to check.

"If you can not imagine that an intelligence official could get something important wrong, whether by accident or on purpose, you are taking far too many things for granted that need to be questioned and checked out first."-Daniel Larison (DanielLarison) November 22, 2022

Indeed, the only reason the press receive such explicit protections in the United States Constitution is because they are supposed to hold the powerful to account.

If the editors of a wildly influential news agency will just unquestioningly parrot whatever they are fed by government officials while simultaneously protecting those officials with anonymity, they are not holding the powerful to account, and are in fact not meaningfully different from state propagandists.

They are state propagandists. Which is probably why they are sipping lattes in the AP newsroom while Julian Assange languishes in prison.

As Jacobins Branko Marcetic observed, this is far from the first time AP has given the cover of anonymity to United States government officials circulating bogus claims of potentially dangerous consequence, like the time it reported an officials evidence-free assertion which later proved false that Iran had carried out an attack on four oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates, or the time it let another one anonymously claim that "Iran may try to take advantage of Americas troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan."

Irresponsible journalism from the AP, but this strikes me as quite damning and suggests it is more than just one reporter that is the problem. After all, this is not even close to the first time the AP has published a false, war-baiting claim by a anon official.-Branko Marcetic (BMarchetich) November 22, 2022

So to recap-

-Powerful government official who fed AP a false story: Zero accountability

-AP editor who asked if a report should immediately be published upon receipt of the story: Zero accountability

-Second AP editor who says she can not imagine a United States intelligence official would be wrong: Zero accountability

-Journalist who wrote the story: Singular accountability

In a sane society, power and responsibility would go hand in hand. A disaster would be blamed on the most powerful people involved in its occurrence. In our society it is generally the exact opposite, with the rank-and-file taking all of the responsibility and none of the power.

Our rulers lie to us, propagandize us, endanger us, impoverish us, destroy journalism, start wars, kill our biosphere and make our world dark and confusing, and they suffer no consequences for it.

We cannot allow them to continue holding all of the power and none of the responsibility.

This is backwards and must end!!!

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".

Ah, the Buddha Ms Caitlin speaks the truth!!! - Cousin Lucky