Is Donald Trump Tucker Carlsons JFK Assassination Source?? by Jacob G. Hornberger
(2022-12-28 at 00:12:51 )

Is Donald Trump Tucker Carlsons JFK Assassination Source?? by Jacob G. Hornberger

On December 15, 2022, Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson delivered a monologue stating his conviction that the Central Intelligence Agency was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The presentation was remarkable given that that sort of thing is never found in the mainstream media. As most everyone knows, the mainstream media avoids the President Kennedy assassination like the plague.

Mr. Carlsons presentation motivated Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to issue the following highly dangerous tweet: "The most courageous newscast in 60 years. The CIAs murder of my uncle was a successful coup d etat from which our democracy has never recovered. TuckerCarlson."

Carlson made his presentation in the context of the CIAs continued steadfast refusal to disclose thousands of its assassination-related records to the United States of American people, along with President Bidens decision to go along with the CIAs decision. These are records that the CIA was mandated to release to the American people by the JFK Records Act, which was enacted in 1992 - thirty years ago!

As I have long maintained, there is only one reason for the CIAs continued secrecy. Those thousands of records contain pieces of incriminating circumstantial evidence that further establish criminal culpability on the part of the CIA in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Obviously, the CIA has concluded that it simply cannot afford to permit the American people, especially assassination researchers, to view those records. Better to have the American people believing that the records are incriminating rather than letting them know that they are incriminating.

On November 8, 2022 - approximately one month before the Carlson presentation - Gerald Celente conducted an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, a former judicial analyst for Fox News. In that interview, Mr. Napolitano recounted a conversation with President Donald Trump, with whom he was friends. In that interview, the pertinent part of which you can view here, Mr. Napolitano stated:

I once had a conversation .. with President Donald Trump when he was in the White House. He used to call me all the time. And we talked about everything under the sun. I said, "Are you going to release those documents or not?" And he said to me, "If you saw what I saw, you would not release them."

In his presentation, Mr. Carlson stated the following:

In 1992, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act. That act mandated full disclosure of all documents by 2017, 54 years after JFK was killed. The last administration promised to comply fully with that law. But under intense pressure from CIA Director Mike Pompeo, withheld, in the end, thousands of pages of CIA documents.

Today, this afternoon, the Biden administration did exactly the same thing. That would be thousands of pages of documents after nearly 60 years, after the death of every single person involved. But we still can not see them. Clearly, it is not to protect any person. They are all dead. It is to protect an institution. But why?

Well, today we decided to find out. We spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden CIA documents, a person who was deeply familiar with what they contained. We asked this person directly, "Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an American President?" And here is the reply we received verbatim. Quote, "The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It is a whole different country from what we thought it was. It is all fake." (Emphasis added.)

Is Donald Trump Mr. Carlsons source???

It would make sense that he is. After all, just a little more than a month ago, Donald Trump told Mr. Napolitano that he had seen the CIAs still-secret records. He also implied to Mr. Napolitano that the still-secret records contain explosive information of an incriminating nature. What else could he have meant when he said, "If you saw what I saw, you would not release them"?

It also stands to reason that Mr. Carlson would have known about the Napolitano interview, given Napolitanos longtime relationship with Fox News. It also stands to reason that Mr. Carlson would have reached out to Donald Trump and that Mr. Trump would have talked to him, given Mr. Trumps longtime close relationship with Fox News.

But whether Donald Trump is Mr. Carlsons source or not, the obvious question arises: Why did Donald Trump not order the release of those long-secret records of the CIA? Why did he, like Biden, participate in the CIAs assassination cover-up by authorizing the CIA to continue keeping its half-century-old records secret? Indeed, why does Mr. Trump, a recently announced candidate for president, not go public right now with what he saw in those records?

One possibility is that the CIA "Hoovered" Mr. Trump into continuing the keep the CIAs decades-old assassination-related records secret. By "Hoovered" I am referring to J. Edgar Hoover, who was a serial blackmailer when he was serving as FBI director.

Mr. Hoover would acquire personal information about people with the aim of blackmailing them into bending them to his will. If they complied, he would keep the information secret. If they refused to comply with Mr. Hoovers will, he would release the information through trusted assets in the mainstream press.

My hunch is that that is what happened with Donald Trump. After all, when the deadline for release was coming due, Mr. Trump publicly announced that he intended to order the release of the CIAs assassination-related records. Then, just before the deadline came due, however, the CIA somehow prevailed on Donald Trump to suddenly change his mind and instead to grant the CIAs demand to extend the time for secrecy.

In the final analysis though, the CIAs steadfast refusal to disclose those thousands of assassination-related records is, largely, irrelevant. As I have maintained over the years, once it was established beyond a reasonable doubt that the national-security establishment conducted a fraudulent autopsy on President Kennedys body, the gig was up.

That is because there is no innocent explanation for a fraudulent autopsy. None! No one has ever come up with an innocent explanation for the fraudulent autopsy, and no one ever will. A fraudulent autopsy necessarily means criminal culpability in the assassination itself. See my article "Why the JFK Assassination Should Matter to Everyone." Also see my books The Kennedy Autopsy, The Kennedy Autopsy 2, Regime Change: The JFK Assassination, and, most recently, An Encounter with Evil: The Abraham Zapruder Story,

The CIAs continued steadfast refusal to release the thousands of remaining assassination-related records tends to confirm what Mr. Trump told Mr. Napolitano. But those records would simply add additional evidence to what the fraudulent autopsy has already established: that the November 22, 1963, assassination was a regime-change operation intended to protect "national security" from a president who was determined to lead the United States of America in a direction different from the direction that the Pentagon and the CIA were determined to lead America.

NOTE: Credit is given to Charles Burris, who first raised the possibility that Mr. Trump is Mr. Carlsons source in the following article at LewRockwell.com: "Will Tucker Carlson Reveal The High Level Source Which Confirmed That The Deep State Murdered JFK In A Regime Change Coup d etat?

Reprinted here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Libertarian Website!!