The War of Terror of a Rogue Superpower: Cui Bono? By Pepe Escobar
(2023-02-13 at 04:06:29 )

The War of Terror of a Rogue Superpower: Cui Bono? By Pepe Escobar

When it comes to the Global South, what the Hersh report imprints is Rogue Superpower, in giant blood red letters, as state sponsor of terrorism.

Everyone with a brain already knew the Empire did it. Now Seymour Hershs bombshell report not only details how Nord Stream 1 and 2 were attacked, but also names names: from the toxic Straussian neoliberal-con trio Sullivan, Blinken and Nuland all the way to the Teleprompter Reader-in-Chief.

Arguably the most incandescent nugget in Mr. Hershs narrative is to point ultimate responsibility directly at the White House. The Central Intelligence Agency, for its part, gets away with it. The whole report may be read as the framing of a scapegoat. A very fragile, shoddy scapegoat - what with those classified documents in the garage, the endless stares into the void, the cornucopia of incomprehensible mumbling, and of course the whole, ghastly, years-long family corruption carousel in and around Ukraine, still to be completely unveiled.

Mr. Hershs report happened to pop up immediately after the deadly earthquakes in Turkey-Syria. This is an investigative journalism earthquake in itself, straddling over fault lines and revealing countless open air fissures, nuggets of truth gasping for air amidst the rubble.

But is that all there is?

Does the narrative hold from start to finish? Yes and no. First of all, why now? This is a leak - essentially from one Deep State insider, Mr. Hershs key source. This 21st century "Deep Throat" remix may be appalled at the toxicity of the system, but at the same time he knows that whatever he says, there will be no consequences.

Cowardly Berlin - ignoring the nuts and bolts of the scheme all along - will not even squeak. After all the Green gang has been ecstatic, because the terror attack has thoroughly advanced their medieval de-industrialization agenda. In parallel, as an extra bonus, all the other European vassals receive further confirmation this is the fate that awaits them if they do not follow His Masters Voice.

Mr. Hershs narrative frames the Norwegians as the essential accessory to terror. Hardly surprising: NATOs Jens "Peace is War" Stoltenberg has been a Central Intelligence Agency asset for perhaps half a century. And Oslo of course had its own motives to be part of the deal; to collect loads of extra cash selling whatever spare energy it had for desperate European customers.

A little narrative problem is that Norway, unlike the United States Navy, still does not have any operational P-8 Poseidon. What was clear at the time is that an American P-8 was commuting back and forth - with mid-air refueling - from the United States to Bornholm island.

A positive screamer is that Mr. Hersh - rather, his key source - had the MI6 completely vanish from the narrative. SVR, Russian intel, had focused like a laser on MI6 at the time, as well as the Poles. What still cements the narrative is that the combo behind "Biden" provided the planning, the intel and coordinated the logistics, while the final act - in this case a sonar buoy detonating the C4 explosives - may have been perpetrated by the Norwegian vassals.

The problem is the buoy may have been dropped by an American P-8. And there is no explanation of why one of the sections of Nord Stream 2 escaped intact.

Mr. Hershs modus operandi is legendary. From the perspective of a foreign correspondent on the ground since the mid-1990s, from the United States and NATOstan to all corners of Eurasia, it is easy for someone like me to understand how he uses anonymous sources and how he accesses - and protects - his extensive list of contacts: trust works both ways. His track record is absolutely unrivalled.

But of course the possibility remains: what if he is being played?

Is this no more than a limited hangout?

After all, the narrative oscillates wildly between minute detail and quite a few dead ends, constantly featuring a huge paper trail and too many people in the loop - which implies exaggerated risk. The Central Intelligence Agency hesitating too much to go for the kill is a certified red alert throughout the narrative - especially when we know that the ideal underwater actors for such an op would have come from the Central Intelligence Agency Special Activities Division, and not the United States Navy.

What will Russia do??

Arguably the whole planet is thinking what will be the Russian response.

Surveying the chessboard, what the Kremlin and the Security Council see is Merkel confessing Minsk 2 was merely a ruse; the imperial attack on the Nord Streams (they got the picture, but might not have all the insider details provided by Mr. Hershs source); former Israeli PM Bennett on the record detailing how the Anglo-Americans killed the Ukraine peace process which was on track in Istanbul last year.

So it is no wonder that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has made it clear that when it comes to nuclear negotiations with the Americans, any proposed gestures of goodwill are "unjustified, untimely and uncalled for."

The Ministry, on purpose, and somewhat ominously, was very vague on a key issue: "strategic nuclear forces objects" that have been attacked by Kiev - helped by the Americans. These attacks may have involved "military-technical and information-intelligence" aspects.

When it comes to the Global South, what the Hersh report imprints is Rogue Superpower, in giant blood red letters, as state sponsor of terrorism: the ritual burial - at the bottom of the Baltic Sea - of international law, and even the Empires tawdry ersatz, the "rules-based international order".

It will take some time to fully identify which Deep State faction may have used Mr. Hersh to promote its agenda. Of course he is aware of it - but that would never have been enough to keep him away from researching a bombshell (three months of hard work). The United States mainstream media will do everything to suppress, censor, demean and ignore his report; but what matters is that across the Global South it is already spreading like wildfire.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Lavrov has gone totally unplugged, much like Medvedev, denouncing how the United States has "unleashed a total hybrid war" against Russia, with both nuclear powers now on a path of direct confrontation. And as Washington,D.C. has declared the "strategic defeat" of Russia as its goal and turned bilateral relations into a ball of fire, there can be no "business as usual" anymore.

The Russian "response" - even before Mr. Hershs report - has been on another level entirely; advanced de-dollarization across the spectrum, from the EAEU to BRICS and beyond; and total reorientation of trade towards Eurasia and other parts of the Global South. Russia is establishing firm conditions for further stability, already foreseeing the inevitable: the time to frontally deal with NATO.

As kinetic responses go, facts on the battleground show Russia further crushing the American-NATO proxy army in full Strategic Ambiguity mode. The terror attack on the Nord Streams of course will always be lurking in the background. There will be blowback. But that will be at a time, manner and place of Russias choosing!!!

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.