The Cold War Racket Is Back by Jacob G. Hornberger!
(2023-03-07 at 20:41:23 )

The Cold War Racket Is Back by Jacob G. Hornberger!

Chinese leader Xi Jinping has issued a direct critique against the United States governments policy of containment when it comes to China. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, the critique is unusual in that it comes directly from Chinas leader rather than indirectly through governmental spokespersons.

The Journal article quotes Shirley Martey Hargis, fellow at the Washington think tank Atlantic Council, who suggests that Xi might just be shifting the blame for economic problems in China. "It is either take the blame or shift it," she said.

Notwithstanding Chinas economic problems, however, the fact is that Xi is right. There is no denying that United States national-security establishment, led by the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency, have been pursuing a Cold War policy of containment against China, with the aim of renewing its old Cold War racket.

Of course, as the Russians will attest, the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency have been doing the same with them - doing everything they can to gin up their old Cold War racket against Russia, just as they are doing against China.

Take a look at this map. You might be shocked, or maybe not. It displays the number of United States military bases near China. Tom Orsag, a freelance leftist journalist, points out that "China is effectively encircled by United States bases all across the Pacific." Orsag adds, "The United States is the biggest bully in the Pacific, with rings of military bases blocking and threatening China."

Now, take a look at this map. It depicts the number of Chinese military bases near the United States. Number? Zero!

In fact, according to an article at Eurasia Times entitled "Over 750 Military Bases Across 80 Countries: How United States Military Overshadows China In Projecting Power Overseas," China has the grand total of one foreign military base - in Djibouti, which is more than 7,000 miles away from the United States.

Take a look at this map. It shows the number of United States military bases near both Russia and China.

Now, take a look at this map again. It shows the number of Russian military bases near the United States. Number? Zero!

Let us just imagine that the situation was reversed. Let us assume that the United States had no military bases overseas whatsoever and had a non-empire, non-interventionist foreign policy. And let us imagine that the United States was encircled by the same number of Russian and Chinese military bases that the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency have encircling Russia and China.

What do you think would be the reaction of U.S. officials? My hunch is that they would be going ballistic and directly objecting to China’s and Russia’s policy of encircling and containing the United States, just as Russia and China are currently objecting to U.S. encirclement and containment of their countries.

Are China and Russia justified in their concern over the Pentagons encirclement of their nations??

Martin Luther King,Jr. whose birthday United States officials honor each year with a federal holiday, pointed out that the United States was the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. And that was before the United States invasions and wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq! Given such, why would China and Russia not be concerned about being encircled and contained by the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency??

The Wall Street Journal article cited above quotes Jessica Chen Weiss, a Cornell University professor and former State Department advisor, saying in response to the escalating tensions between China and the United States, "The current tit-for-tat spiral serves no one."

Is Weiss really that innocent and naive?? Serves no one??

Are you kidding me??

It serves the entire United States national-security establishment, including its army of "defense" contractors who eat out our substance by feeding voraciously at the public trough.

The current tit-for-tat gives the United States national-security establishment its old - and extremely lucrative - Cold War racket back.

Reprinted here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Libertarian Website!!