Imagine If All Officials Were Interrogated By Reporters Like This by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2023-03-29 at 19:43:20 )

Imagine If All Officials Were Interrogated By Reporters Like This by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article:

A fascinating exchange took place at a United Nations press briefing the other day between China Global Television Networks Xu Dezhi and the UNs Deputy Spokesperson for the Secretary-General Farhan Haq about the United States military occupation of Syria. The exchange is interesting both for the wild pro-United States bias shown by a UN official, and for the way it illustrates how much truth can be exposed when journalists do what they are supposed to do in the press gallery.

Xu, who has done on-the-ground reporting in Syria in the past, asked Haq some challenging questions about an attack on a United States military base in eastern Syria last week which injured multiple American troops and killed an American contractor. In his response, Haq made the extremely incorrect claim that there are no United States armed forces in Syria, and refused to say whether the United States military occupation of part of the country is illegal.

Here is the UNs transcript of the key part of this exchange (emphasis added by me):

Xu: Do you not urge everyone to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria?

Haq: Well of course, that is a given, and obviously it is important that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria is respected. At the same time you are aware of the complexity of the situation of foreign forces, but we call for them to exercise restraint.

Xu: But, do you think the presence of the United States military in Syria is illegal or not?

Haq: That is not an issue that we are dealing with at this stage. There has been a war.

Xu: But, is that.. because it sounds very familiar this week. We talk a lot about the UN Charter, the international law and relative resolutions. But, it sounds to me, a foreign ministry based presence in another country without invitation, sounds like something else to me.

Haq: I will leave your analysis to you. That there is.. At this stage there is no..

Xu: What is the difference between the situation in Syria and the situation in Ukraine?

Haq: There is no United States armed forces inside of Syria. And so I do not have a.. It is not a parallel situation to some of the others.

Xu: You are sure there is no United States military personnel in Syria?

Haq: I believe there is military activity. But, in terms of a ground presence in Syria, I am not aware of that.

Xu: Okay. Five United States service members were injured in that attack. If there were no United States service members in Syria, how could they got injured? That is weird, right? Should I ask you about that? And by the way, if you are talking about the resolution, the international law here is the resolution from Security Council 2254 (2015), I believe, it says in its PA [preambular] paragraph, "reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic and to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations".

Haq: Yes. I am aware of that. And as you see, that is accepted by the members of the Security Council itself.

Xu: Yeah. So, again, back to my question, is that illegal to have presence in Syria for the United States base, according to the relevant resolution that I just read out?

Haq: The relevant resolution does call for that and we call on all countries to respect that. I would not go beyond that at this stage.

To be absolutely clear, this is a United Nations official. Haq has been in his current position as deputy spokesperson for almost a decade, and routinely answers questions about Syria as part of his capacity in that position.

It is not some obscure esoteric secret that there are United States military personnel in Syria; it is in the mainstream news constantly. Just the other day The New York Times reported that "America still has more than 900 troops, and hundreds more contractors, in Syria."

Haq was either ignorant of this extremely important and relevant piece of common knowledge, or was dishonestly pretending to be. The most charitable interpretation of his actions at this press conference is that he sincerely did not know the United States has armed forces in Syria.

To put it into perspective, this is like being a United Nations official and routinely taking questions about Ukraine from the press, but not knowing that Russia invaded Ukraine and has been fighting a war there since last year.

Haq is the son of a Pakistani politician but speaks with a pristine American accent, and his acrobatics in dodging around Xus United States-critical questions would impress even Jen Psaki. My favorite part is when he says "I will leave your analysis to you," because it is such a brilliant deflection that can be used on any inconvenient question you can imagine ("Sir why are you holding a severed human head in your hands right now?" "Look, I will leave your analysis to you.")

Xus straightforward, intellectually honest questions were all it took to get Haq to expose himself as an airheaded empire lackey, and I can not help but fantasize about how wonderful the world would be if this happened all the time.

I mean, compare this oppositional interrogation with the shit show that erupted in the White House press gallery earlier this month when Today News Africas Simon Ateba interrupted some silly publicity appearance by the cast of Ted Lasso to complain that White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre had not called on him in seven months.

The entire press corps immediately leapt to the defense of the White House official in the most sycophantic way imaginable, turning against their fellow journalist and paternalistically telling Ateba to shut up and mind his manners when he accused Jean-Pierre of "making a mockery of the First Amendment."

Reporters from immensely influential platforms like Reuters, AP and CNN shouted Ateba down with calls of "Be respectful!" and "Mind your manners," with one woman even shrieking "Decorum!" at the top of her lungs like an overwhelmed child. APs Zeke Miller even apologized for Atebas "display", saying "I just want to express our apologies in the press corps to the folks watching at home for the display we saw earlier."

Those are the sort of groveling bootlickers who insulate the press secretary of the most powerful government office on this planet. Imagine what would happen if the press were as oppositional to Jean-Pierre as Xu Dezhi was to the UNs Farhan Haq. Imagine what contradictions could be exposed, what hypocrisy illuminated, what inconvenient questions pursued until a fruitful response was arrived at.

Instead we get the worlds most powerful government represented by people whose only traits are the ability to skillfully avoid providing meaningful answers, receiving slobbering rim jobs from power-worshipping cronies who want nothing more than to be their friend. This is the exact opposite of a healthy dynamic, and the exact opposite of a functioning free press.

It should not take a reporter from Chinese state media to ask inconvenient questions about the most powerful and destructive government on earth; western journalists should be falling all over themselves to ask those questions, because that is what the job is supposed to be. The fact that this is not what happens shows that the free press has been replaced with propaganda, and accountability has been replaced with the blind service of power!!

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".

Ah, the Buddha Ms Caitlin speaks the truth!!! - Cousin Lucky