Menu
Paynal © 2008
I Predict Trump Will Continue The Central Intelligence Agencys John F. Kennedy Assassination Cover-Up By Jacob G. Hornberger!!
(2017-10-23 at 13:14:37 )
I Predict Trump Will Continue the Central Intelligence Agencys John F. Kennedy Assassination Cover-Up by Jacob G. Hornberger
Last Friday, President Trump made the following announcement:
"I have decided not to block release of the Central Intelligence Agencys remaining John F. Kennedy-assassination related records except for those records that directly implicate the Central Intelligence Agency in the assassination, which will continue to remain secret."
Okay, he did not really put it like that. But that is the potential and likely import of his announcement, which actually read as follows:
"Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened." (Italics added.)
The operative words, of course, are: "Subject to the receipt of further information..."
What is going on here?
Negotiations. The art of the deal. The Central Intelligence Agency desperately does not want to show the American people its long-secret John F. Kennedy-related records. It has asked Trump to continue keeping at least some of them secret notwithstanding the passage of more than 50 years since the Kennedy assassination.
Under long-established custom and tradition in Washington, D.C., when someone asks someone else for a favor, the person who is in a position to grant the favor demands something in return. That is where the negotiations between Trump and the Central Intelligence Agency come into play. Trump wants something in return. We do not know what - maybe laying off on the Russia investigation - but his announcement last Friday is obviously part of the concluding steps of such negotiations.
What Trump has done with his announcement is send a clear message to the Central Intelligence Agency: "Give me what I want and I will give you what you want. Otherwise, I will let all your cherished long-secret records relating to the John F. Kennedy assassination be shown to the American people."
Make no mistake about it: A deal is about to be made. The Central Intelligence Agency will cave. It will end up giving Trump whatever it is he wants. Trump is in the drivers seat because the Central Intelligence Agency cannot afford to permit the American people to see the records it wants to continue to be kept secret. And once the Central Intelligence Agency gives Trump what he wants, he will cave and give the Central Intelligence Agency the continued secrecy it so desperately needs. All this will happen by this Thursday, the date set by law for release of all the John F. Kennedy records that Trump has not blocked.
Think about it: The Central Intelligence Agency has asked the president to continue secrecy of records that are more than 50 years old or, apparently, some relating to secret correspondence between the Central Intelligence Agency and the Assassination Records Review Board back in the 1990s.
The Central Intelligence Agencys ground? "National Security" of course, the two most important and meaningless words in the American political lexicon.
National Security? Really?
Whatever definition that one might put on that nebulous term, no reasonable person can honestly believe that the release of 50-year-old records are going to result in the United States falling into the ocean or even that the communists are going to take over the federal government.
The Central Intelligence Agency says that releasing its decades-old John F. Kennedy records will reveal secret "methods" of intelligence gathering.
Really? What, like the Central Intelligence Agency was using typewriters instead of computers and pay telephones instead of cell phones?
What is amazing (or not) is the extreme nonchalance of the mainstream media to the Central Intelligence Agencys request for continued secrecy. That should be big news. It is essentially an admission of guilt, given that it is absolutely ludicrous to think that "National Security" would be threatened by the release of the Central Intelligence Agencys long-secret John F. Kennedy-assassination-related records.
You see, the mainstream media starts with the assumption that the Central Intelligence Agency had nothing to do with the assassination. In their minds, the assassination was committed by a lone nut former United States Marine communist, one who had no motive to kill the president.
Such being the case, the mainstream media, deferring to the Central Intelligence Agency, automatically concludes that its wish to continue keeping secret has to be based on "National Security" grounds rather than an attempt by the Central Intelligence Agency to continue its cover-up of its assassination of the president.
Let us proceed from the opposite assumption: That the Central Intelligence Agency, in partnership with the military and the Mafia, orchestrated the assassination by framing a former United States Marine who was then working for United States intelligence, either Navy intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, or the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or a combination of all three.
Do not forget, after all, that that is what Oswald said. He said he was being framed. Yet, from the very beginning, the mainstream media has never given any serious consideration to the possibility that Oswald was framed for the crime.
Instead, they have steadfastly stuck with the official story, one that has all the characteristics of a pat frame-up: That Oswald acted alone or possibly acted in concert with others, both of which lead to nothing but dead ends, contradictions, and anomalies.
Now, let us assume instead that Oswald was telling the truth when he said he was being framed. In that case, it would be imperative that the Central Intelligence Agency and the military keep as tight a lid on their records as possible to ensure that investigators or investigative reporters would have a difficult time piercing through to the circumstantial evidence that establishes the frame-up.
As part of the frame-up, the Central Intelligence Agency would have to fortify the persona of Oswald, its intelligence agent, as a purported communist. That would enable the Central Intelligence Agency to blame the assassination on a communist, which, not coincidentally, was the advice that the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency were doling out to Latin American military dictatorships at the School of the Americas. In cases of covert state-sponsored assassinations, Latin American regimes were taught, a good strategy was to blame the assassination on a communist because then they could smear anyone who challenged the official story as a communist sympathizer.
It would also explain why the Central Intelligence Agency was closely monitoring Oswalds movements prior to the assassination, something else that the Central Intelligence Agency kept secret for decades. They had to make certain that Oswald was not on to them and had not discovered that he was being set up for a frame-up.
The first organization that came out with a press release advertising Oswalds bona fides was the DRE, an anti-communist group in New Orleans with which Oswald had had contact. What no one knew at the time, and what the Central Intelligence Agency intentionally kept secret for decades, was that the DRE was a Central Intelligence Agency front organization. It was being generously funded by the Central Intelligence Agency and controlled by a secret Central Intelligence Agency agent named George Joannides, which the Central Intelligence Agency would intentionally keep secret from the Warren Commission in the 1960s, the House Select Committee in the 1970s, and the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990s.
But there was another big operation to establish Oswalds communist bona fides before the assassination. It had to do with Oswalds trip to Mexico City, where he visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies.
Something dreadful obviously went wrong with that part of the operation because the official investigation into it was quickly shut down during the early post-assassination period. Today, Oswalds Mexico City trip, which is part of those Central Intelligence Agency records ready to be released, is still shrouded in mystery.
The Central Intelligence Agencys continued secrecy in the John F. Kennedy assassination is no big surprise. As I wrote in my October 11 article, "Will Trump Make a Deal with the CIA on JFK Records?," the Central Intelligence Agency is between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, it knows that those records will further implicate the Central Intelligence Agency in the Kennedy assassination. On the other hand, it knows that by seeking continued secrecy, it is essentially an implicit acknowledgement of guilt.
Not surprisingly, it is choosing the latter course, especially because it knows that its assets and allies in the mainstream press will continue to come to its defense with respect to its ridiculous claim of "National Security."
Do the Central Intelligence Agencys long-secret records contain a video-taped confession? Of course not. And they do not contain any reference to assassinating Kennedy. The Central Intelligence Agencys practice from the very beginning has been to not put any reference to a state-sponsored assassination into writing.
But there has to be a reason why the Central Intelligence Agency chose to keep this particular batch of records secret for more than 50 years. Those long-secret records undoubtedly include small bits of important circumstantial evidence the fill out even further the mosaic of a regime-change operation that took place in Dallas in November 1963, the same types of regime-change operation that took place in Iran in 1952, Guatemala in 1954, Cuba in 1960-1963, Congo in 1961, and Chile in 1973, all of which the Central Intelligence Agency steadfastly kept secret from the American people.
In 1953, the Central Intelligence Agency was in the process of developing a top-secret "manual on assassinations", one that showed that the Central Intelligence Agency was specializing not only in the art of assassination but also in the art of covering up its role in state-sponsored assassinations. Every American owes it to himself to read that manual.
Too bad the mainstream press has never given that manual the consideration it deserves. If it did, it might not be so deferential to the deal that Trump and the Central Intelligence Agency are about to make to continue the John F. Kennedy assassination cover-up by continuing to keep some of the Central Intelligence Agencys decades-old John F. Kennedys related assassination records secret from the American people.
For more information, see the following ebooks published by FFF:
" The Kennedy Autopsy" by Jacob Hornberger
"JFKs War with the National Security Establishment: Why Kennedy Was Assassinated" by Douglas Horne
"Regime Change: The Kennedy Assassination by Jacob Hornberger"
"The CIA, Terrorism, and the Cold War: The Evil of the National Security State" by Jacob Hornberger
"CIA & JFK: The Secret Assassination Files link" by Jefferson Morley.
Printed here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Great Website!!